Citizens calling for Birthers to be labeled terrorists on Open Government Website

OpenGov ^ | 6/2/2009 | OpenGov

[Art in Idaho]

Great. Now I'm a terrorist. Well excuuse me, but we have a national emergency Constitutional issue that needs to be settled. Every possible scenario regarding the data on Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate is a "so what?" except if he were ineligible. How would he be ineligible? If he was born on foreign soil for sure. Possibly other issues that need to be "lawyered out" such as 1. Obama admits he was a British citizen at birth on his website. 2. Anne Dunham had not sufficient residency in the U.S. and wasn't of sufficient age to confer U.S. citizenship on Barack at his birth in 1961. 3. If he was, in fact, born in Hawaii in 1961, he was a British citizen only, and only under British jurisdiction as a visitor to Hawaii. 4. In 1961 the U.S. did not permit dual citizenship. So even had his mother been of sufficient age and U.S. residency, he could not have gained U.S. citizenship by a Hawaiian birth through her. His Certificate of Live Birth could not grant citizenship to a British national. 5. As with any parents who are foreign nationals giving birth in the U.S., and "not under the jurisdiction thereof", Obama would have to return to the U.S. and undergo the naturalization process, and sign a written citizenship oath to gain U.S. citizenship for the first time. This is exactly what happens to the children of foreign tourists whose children claim citizenship under the 14th Amendment birthright. Citizenship under these circumstances does not constitute being "natural born". Therefore, Obama was never a U.S. citizen as a minor, could only become one by naturalization, and if he has not done so, he is an illegal alien like his half-aunt from Kenya. So, the case should at least be heard. Will it be? Probably on the state level first. The other reason for Obama to avoid disclosure is the potential exposure regarding the fraudulant COLB produced on the web. If the data doesn't match, then we're talking charges, indictments, etc. So What is He Hiding and Why? What's on the Long Form? Obama's saying I don't need to show it and I won't. Well, the issue is Not going away and it's building. States within the next four years will require presidential candidates to be properly vetted to get on the ballot. It will take legislatures awhile, but the wheels are in motion. . .

[Eye of Unk]

Talk about oil vs. water, on many discussion forums, at schools, and on the street the birthers are touted as the last stand against the destruction of America by an attack from within.

Every day I hear of people “just waking up to the news” of this and are wanting to know more, they are desperate to know if this is true, and are fervently hoping it can be used to remove Obama from office and nullify his acts of destruction.

I have seen home grown bumper stickers, fingerpainted on dirty cars and trucks and even a billboard.

Our underground American heroes?

Are they now about to be hunted down and portrayed in the light such as child pornographers? Is Obama so desperate to protect his omnipotent position that he will know no bounds and will ramp up any means possible to stop the “birthers” from gaining any more momentum? A fabricated event to give them a negative public impression, or of no confidence?

Its going to happen, the most powerful man on earth is too high on the power trip to step down because the little people are figuring out the truth, more than likely a new ad campaign will arise to establish his American roots, or to make him a legal POTUS by changing the Constitution.