Posted on 05/19/2009 7:57:02 PM PDT by Michael Eden
She’s a Leftist. She doesn’t mind.
The sad thing is that formerly, the MSM wouldn’t touch this with a 10 foot pole in order to protect their precious dem president. BUT...since Hillary is still perceived as a threat to their UBER-precious marxist 0bama...they’ll probably run it just to hurt her and help Barry.
But he’s using his right hand!? :-)
This is too funny to miss.
Clinton, of the bulbous red nose, still thinks he’s a romeo.
During the campaign season President Bush gave German Chancellor Angela Merkel a brief, friendly back rub.
Big deal at the MSM.
I can still hear the MSM talking heads “analyzing” Merke’s body language and concluding that she clearly found the “personal contact” “unwanted.”
I guess it’s too bad that Bush didn’t just grab her ass; that would have been fine - and her face would have been turned away from the camera so they couldn’t see her expression.
WTF is with her arms? They look like they collided with an air compressor.
WTF is with her arms? They look like they collided with an air compressor.
- - - - - - -
Maybe Fran Drescher takes her own “wide stance” these days.
On the serious side, she did have a bad fight with cancer, and I’ll cut her a lot of slack as to her appearance.
The one who most definitely does NOT look good in this is the Sleaze-in-Chief.
“No, Bill. I SAID, have you seen the NANNY!?”
I hardly think a blog is the MSM.
She’s a cancer and a rape survivor, as another freeper pointed out to me; perhaps whatever treatment/medication they used has added weight. The back cover’s photo of one of her books doesn’t indicate a particularly modest woman, so this may be much ado about nothing.
That’s the Bill Clinton as I remember him.
Dude, I didn't refer to the blog as "the MSM"...I said the MSM would probably run with the story presented by the blog. However, the MSM often does consider leftist blogs, and the comments left within (eeeek!), to be viable news sources.
I’m a dudette—and so far, I haven’t seen a thing from the MSM. Can you point me to a MSM source that has weighed in on this subject.
Bill Clinton and the Nanny Fran are so passe... who cares what those old coots do. Just thank God, they are not of importance to anything.
Ha! She shouldn't pose in her underwear if she doesn't want backrubs.
Fondling a woman’s butt because she’s not “modest” in such a situation doesn’t in any way make it okay.
I can think of a number of times when women more or less “came on” to me at events like office parties and between meetings - and it would STILL have been wrong of me to play grabass. Even if I wasn’t married.
This isn’t two kids on a date; it’s the (MARRIED) former president of the United States at a venue where decorum should be the rule rather than the exception.
The big deal to me - as is so often - is the double standard. How would the media treat George Bush with his hand on some woman’s butt? Particularly if he had anything resembling Clinton’s history? They would have been all over him like vultures on carcass.
Yeah, I’ve gotta take the dudette’s side. I think you misconstrued her.
I thought she was pointing out that the MSM - which ordinarily wouldn’t cover such events out of reflexive liberal tendencies - MIGHT cover this just as a means to further embarrass Hillary and undermine her for any future run at Obama.
And, of course, that might be true. But the only way the MSM will cover something that undermines a liberal seems to be if such coverage helps ANOTHER more desirable liberal.
Yep...and will grope anything with a you know what.
Too bad that so many wimmen seem to enjoy it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.