Skip to comments.
Rationalism, Communism, Darwinism
Inbred Science ^
| eco
Posted on 01/24/2009 5:28:02 AM PST by Ethan Clive Osgoode
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: DevNet
What is not touched upon in Augustine's writing is that the infidel wants to be the final arbiter of what the Christian shall believe about the physical world according to the standards and bounds as determined by that same infidel.
Many have gone to “science” to ask what part of the Bible they may believe as factual, true, and have been told to toss this and that in the name of not being “unscientific”.
To do so is mistaken as much of what is called science is what the Apostle Paul called, “contradictions of the falsely called “knowledge” “. It is this that the Bible conflicts with not fact.
21
posted on
01/24/2009 9:35:27 AM PST
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
You seem to be willing to go to any length to defeat the theory of evolution...
...short of actually producing any evidence against the theory.
But I guess if you didn't have Borking and character assassination you wouldn't have anything at all. What a joke!
22
posted on
01/24/2009 9:41:28 AM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Coyoteman; Ethan Clive Osgoode; Mr. Silverback; tpanther
“But I guess if you didn’t have Borking and character assassination you wouldn’t have anything at all. What a joke!”
Character assassination? Like this?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2154313/posts?page=403#403
“See: DOMINIONISM.”
http://www.religioustolerance.org/reconstr.htm
Like accusing everyone who disagrees with the ToE as theocrats who what to send us back to the dark ages?
Like calling everyone who disagrees with evolution a creatard, creatoid, IDiot, Idiac, evil, demented husksters, and ignoramuses?
Or of being anti-science and spreading lies about people around FR as if they were true?
Or doesn’t that count?
23
posted on
01/24/2009 10:11:06 AM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
24
posted on
01/24/2009 10:13:04 AM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: metmom
"
They think that if they can make one part of the Bible out to be a lie, they can make the whole thing out to be a lie." Yes, that is the clear goal.
25
posted on
01/24/2009 10:19:14 AM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: Ethan Clive Osgoode; DevNet
Dev is not soliton!
Soliton had at least 100 OQ points on Dev.
I believe that Dev is an adolescent.
26
posted on
01/24/2009 10:23:02 AM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: Ethan Clive Osgoode; DevNet
Dev is not soliton!
Soliton had at least 100 IQ points on Dev.
I believe that Dev is an adolescent.
27
posted on
01/24/2009 10:23:10 AM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: metmom
Anyone who believes the Sun orbits the Earth has rejected nearly every science developed over the past 300 years.
28
posted on
01/24/2009 11:42:53 AM PST
by
DevNet
(What's past is prologue)
To: editor-surveyor
Why do you insist on the personal attacks?
29
posted on
01/24/2009 11:43:23 AM PST
by
DevNet
(What's past is prologue)
To: DevNet; editor-surveyor; Ethan Clive Osgoode; count-your-change
Thread hijacking again?
How about addressing the article in the thread instead?
Or can’t you defend the beginnings of your cult?
30
posted on
01/24/2009 12:00:26 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: DevNet; editor-surveyor; Ethan Clive Osgoode; count-your-change; Fichori
Anyone who believes the Sun orbits the Earth has rejected nearly every science developed over the past 300 years.So now all of science rests on astronomy instead of evolution?
Moving the goalposts again?
31
posted on
01/24/2009 12:04:03 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
You claimed to not be anti-science - to refute this I stated what appears to be one of your beliefs that is extremely anti-science. More evidence exists about your belief in geocentricism then exists about anything you have accused me of.
Did you expect me to not respond at all?
32
posted on
01/24/2009 12:05:26 PM PST
by
DevNet
(What's past is prologue)
To: metmom
Your belief in the entire universe going around a fixed Earth violates physics and a host of other basic sciences.
For your idea to work you have to have objects traveling faster than c and ignoring all the know laws of physics.
33
posted on
01/24/2009 12:07:55 PM PST
by
DevNet
(What's past is prologue)
To: Just mythoughts
"I merely see that untrained minds attach themselves to words, and that it may be a waste of effort to try to detach them." Key to the furious anger against any who question Darwinism... those untrained minds.
Key to the furious anger against any who question Creationism... those untrained minds.
34
posted on
01/24/2009 12:26:04 PM PST
by
Darwin Fish
(God invented evolution. Man invented religion.)
To: DevNet; metmom
Are you serious? Do some posters here actually believe the sun orbits the earth?!?
Actually, I guess I am not all that surprised.
35
posted on
01/24/2009 12:32:00 PM PST
by
Darwin Fish
(God invented evolution. Man invented religion.)
To: DevNet
Nay not so, in fact science says the sun does orbit the earth from our frame of reference and hence even the most astute astronomer speaks of “sun rise” and set.
From another position the earth does a spiraling chase of the sun because the sun is not stationary with respect to the rest of the galaxy.
36
posted on
01/24/2009 12:34:52 PM PST
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: DevNet
Why do you insist on injecting your stupidity into every thread?
37
posted on
01/24/2009 12:51:09 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: Darwin Fish; metmom
I have been told they do.
And metmom does appear to believe the Earth is what the rest of the universe orbits around.
38
posted on
01/24/2009 1:45:50 PM PST
by
DevNet
(What's past is prologue)
To: count-your-change
I am referring to an absolute unmoving Earth which ever piece of matter in the universe orbits around.
That is why I say those who believe that to be true are disregarding nearly every branch of science.
39
posted on
01/24/2009 1:48:36 PM PST
by
DevNet
(What's past is prologue)
To: DevNet
You claimed to not be anti-science - to refute this I stated what appears to be one of your beliefs that is extremely anti-science. More evidence exists about your belief in geocentricism then exists about anything you have accused me of.Links?
You really need to stop lying about me.
40
posted on
01/24/2009 1:57:03 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson