MF already posted another thread in GDP, AND mentioned the unmentionable name by not mentioning him personally, but rather by mentioning an article that mentions the unmentionable name. Looks like they are a person of their word. What a maroon:
“I must mention beforehand that the name of a certain chairman is mentioned by him. I know, I know. I said I wouldn’t, but I’m not. He is.”
Man, Charles, that is awesome, the way you did that, trimming out all the extraneous stuff and leaving in all the good stuff.
That’s one great piece. Admirable.
That is just so good.
Of course, I’m biased in tastes; I tend to like primitive bonfires that betray their anthropology and sociology, and this is an excellent example.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By the way, if one wishes to vote for the Top Ten DUmmies of 2008, but isn’t a member of either web-site hosting the election, personal-reply me to get the one-sentence instruction how to do it.
One can vote for up to 10 primitives, or DUmmies; usually it’s too hard to select a top DUmmie, or primitive, and so it’s easier to vote for more than one, up to 10.
Minus the medications and psychoses of course. Just minor differences.