Constitutional Crisis? (more commentary on Obama's eligibility to be President)

JOE7000 ^ | November 15, 2008 | by J.W. Schultz

[Gemsbok]

Good news, your Sen. may be losing her job!

She co-authored Sen. Resolution 511 that attempted to insert a clause to grant NB status to a single parent with a kid born abroad (retroactively). That clause was struck from the resolution that passed.
She’s in on it as are several other RAT Senators that had prior knowledge.

Research this

[Former Fetus]

All one has to do is to sign the loyalty oath saying they are a citizen of this country. No proof is required. [...] Any liar will sign that pledge without a thought otherwise.[...] The only offices requiring natural born citizenship are the President and Vice President. Yet, no proof is asked for nor obtained. It is the worse case of lack of responsibility and accountability I have ever heard of.

That's why John Adams said in 1798, "Our Constitution was made only for a religious and moral people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other,"

[Faith]

"Our Constitution was made only for a religious and moral people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other."

Boy, isn't that the truth!

[redk]

OMG, pardon my ignorance but when did that happen?!

[Gemsbok]

February, There are several poats and a thread here somewhere back. I’ll ping you to it when I locate this.

Of course if BO went down, the Senators who wrote the Resolution will all plead ignorance and will not go down. The Senate is like a Frat club and they all protect each other.

[redk]

Thanks, I would appreciate it.

[TruthWillWin]

So much noise on this that it’s going to be difficult for the MSM to continue ignoring this. They will (ignore), just going to be harder.

[jackofhearts]

Can someone please tell how the MSM continues to ignore this story? Are we the equivalent of the moonbats on the left or is there something to this story?

[bossmechanic]

After watching this topic develope for many months, it seems to me that ALL the media - including Rush, Beck and Hannity - are holding on this until the supreme court gets involved somehow. No one else can compel Obama to release these records. Congress is too busy getting reelected and it behooves obama’s co-conspiritors to just lie low and dismiss any comments as “nutty”

When the supreme court sez something/anything, it is newsworthy and the serious coverage can begin. But if the court declines to act or just dismisses the challanges out of hand, it will be interesting to watch how the various media proceed. The liberal media will do the ol’ “nothing here - move along” bit. But the truthful media will have to publicly question the underlying facts and cause enough attention that the electoral college will be put under the spotlight.

[Ceebass]

Anyone care to comment on this?

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

[DouglasKC]

Anyone care to comment on this? http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

Sure. A website run by a board that Obama once chaired doesn't qualify as a legal or constitutional expert on the question of whether or not Obama is legally and constitutionally qualified to hold the office of President.

[Scarchin]

The fact that we’re discussing this subject on umpteen threads indicates that SOMEONE thinks this story’s got legs. You mean like when the moonbats obsessed over the Valeris Plame "scandal"? This is a waste of time.

[Gillibrand1]

Dictators are rarely born in the country they rule - some provocative comments.