Posted on 11/04/2008 1:55:06 AM PST by Stingray
Nice try...you’re wrong.
hey buddy....if McPalin loses, you lose....as do we.....
Bzzzt.
Try again.
And read this while you’re rethinking your hypotheses:
http://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/2008/11/03/toast/
doom gloom doom gloom —
Eeyore’s in the room.
Why post this?
Why post this ... NOW?
prisoner6
Go back to DU.
“why all these vanities by no-names?”
First of all, I’ve probably been a member of this forum long before you came along.
Secondly, I take no joy in seeing McCain lose. I will be voting for him today. That doesn’t change what I feel about the imminent outcome of this election.
I hope I’m wrong. I don’t think I am.
Answer the question:
Why post this?
I am not giving up..but agree with most of what you said..I would ad McCains ads all sucked..he should have run ads with Obama not having his hand over his heart during pledge of allegiance
I agree with what you said on most of these things, especially the tactical error involving voting for the bailout. Ditto on the glass houses thing.
People thought Huckabee was bad because he raised taxes in Arkansas to fund new roads and such, so instead they elected someone even more to the left to represent the GOP brand.
At least, for all of Huckabee’s flaws, he could go toe to toe with Obama in oratory skills which we know do make a difference and he opposed the bailout. We would’ve won with Huckabee.
That is not to say that we won’t win with McCain, we might squeak by and win this, so lets get out and VOTE!!!
Hopefully McCain will be a voluntary 1-term president and we can field someone better in 2012 (like Sarah or Jindal).
Welcome to FR.
What a jerk@! Can’t you keep your damn mouth shut until after the election? Assclown!
Well, blame McCain on cue. All RINOs would.
Both McCain and Palin have called him a socialist repeatedly, what more do you want? They had to campaign against the entire MSM as well. Jeeze.
No, no,no, if Barack Hussein Obama *wins* tomorrow, I’m going to blame the people that voted for the little marxist the most. Oh, and you’re not going to “field” a better candidate four years from now, this country will be deep into the revolution by then.
I believe your last paragraphs hurt your overall reasoning. No, your assessment of the veep situation is not right.
Given the fact that you’ve all chosen to attack me rather than the points I raised in my post means you have no better argument than to attack the messenger?
Hate to say it, but that’s pretty typical of someone who’s losing the debate.
Why post this?
We do not yet know the outcome but I don't find many faults with the McCain campaign. Even the Clinton war machine could not stop the Obamanation.
Factoring in the economy, W's extreme unpopularity, fatigue over Iraq and the funding disparity it's quite shocking McCain has kept so competitive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.