Skip to comments.
Is overexposure hot or not? (Poll about Celebs showing off too much of their bosoms)
The Fashion Time Magazine ^
| Oct 17th, 2008
| The Fashion Time Magazine
Posted on 10/17/2008 8:23:14 AM PDT by Mister Ghost
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: RightFighter
Oh BABY!
I was going to write some provactive prose about that image - lots of caressing, curves, etc. But deleted it - would probably get me banned.
By the way - what caliber is it?
41
posted on
10/17/2008 10:05:55 AM PDT
by
21twelve
(Ever Vigilant, Never Fearful)
To: 21twelve
I’ve got no idea. I’d love to check.
42
posted on
10/17/2008 10:10:12 AM PDT
by
RightFighter
(That Sarah Palin. She's so hot right now!)
To: bobjam
I cant think of a Best Actress Academy Award winner who had previously appeared topless.Most of the Best Actress winners of the past 15 years have appeared topless, either in the film that won them the award or in previous movies.
To: Maverick68
Fact is, most of these hos are showing their boobies cus they lack any discernable talent. and they want to show off the work they've had done...
To: latina4dubya
and they want to show off the work they've had done... I wonder if they're paid by their surgeons for the display.
45
posted on
10/17/2008 10:26:14 AM PDT
by
Desdemona
(Lipstick only until the election. The gloss has been sacrificed for the greater good.)
To: bk1000
Aguilara is a skank ho. Hurley is a goddess. i'm not a Christina fan, but at least she is married to the father of her baby...
To: Desdemona
I wonder if they're paid by their surgeons for the display. hmmm... that is a thought... i'm sure these surgeons get lots of referrals... some starlet comes to them and says, "i really like what you did with Christina's boobs," or "can you give me the same nose you gave Sandra Bullock?"
To: Americanexpat
A doctor told me the other day that young girls were getting breast transplants, paid for by for by their parents, for their 15 year coming out party.
Coming out of what? Their clothing?
And then when some idiot abuses the privilege of look don't touch and assaults their daughters, who do they blame?
The Pope was right about the USofA . . . we SAY we want to protect the innocence of children and then we allow our children's innocence to be destroyed by Hollywood types who look and sometimes act like prostitutes.
Christina Aguilera doesn't look very cheerful in that photo.
Many years ago a co-worker found her young teen son in the bathroom with her Cosmopolitan Magazine. Who needs porn when you can buy a Cosmo and get the same results?
48
posted on
10/17/2008 11:45:31 AM PDT
by
HighlyOpinionated
(All You Need is Money [Soros] and a Candidate Who Can Be Coached to Look Sincere [Obama]. A. Huxley)
To: Mister Ghost
A beautiful woman is like a work of art, to be appreciated, fully clothed or nude. The fact that so many lovely woman want show off their bodies is one of life's blessings.
To: Mister Ghost
Bobarian doesn't do pop culture, so I'm not real sure who these tarts are.
They're okay, I guess, if you go for that sort of thing, but don't you really want a woman who can back you up in a knife fight?
Having said that,
Slutty: not sexy.
Sultry: WAY sexy.
Call me old school, but it doesn't get any better than this:
50
posted on
10/17/2008 12:13:06 PM PDT
by
Bobarian
(Green: It's the new Red.)
To: mainerforglobalwarming
As a ring of gold in a swine’s snout So is a beautiful woman who lacks discretion. - Proverbs 11:22
To: Mister Ghost
Elizabeth Hurley = hot.
Christina Aguilera = yuck.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson