Posted on 06/18/2008 3:04:50 PM PDT by pissant
I’ve heard enough of Obama and his politics, social life, belliefs, and background to realize he was put in place by people in power (money talks) and that if he IS elected president, we can say “good-bye” to the America we know and love.
We thought the Clintons were bad. This person makes what they did (even Hitlery’s college thesis) look like a kindergarten class.
Pray like everything is up to God, and work like everything is up to us, in order to keep this country free. One of the first things Obama is going to do is pull our troops out of other places in the world, and disband our military.
He’s a Muslim by birth, by name and in fact, and he will destroy this country from within.
Seems like there are enough names and facts for some investigation to take place.
Could he in fact be the Manchurian Candidate?
COMMENT:
The guys a piece of garbage but why should that be a point to discount the mans message.
I would think that common sense would come in play.
Not many outstanding community types and Boy Scouts would perform oral sex with a total stranger, well unless they are Democrats.
I would think that a person who would perform oral sex would be a lowlife pervert.
Obama is an enigma capable of doing just about anything.
Just my opinion.
A. A witness
B. Documentation
Do you think he should be entitled to something more factual than a fallible lie-detector test? Would you want to be?
I stopped by the NPC around 2:15. The Sinclair press conference was shifted to 5 pm from 3 pm. It would be interesting to know how many people attended it. There appeared to be a buzz about it.
Yeah, a state Senator. That's a little different from a U.S. Senator.
Funny that Young was "shut up" in late December of 2007.
Here is what the HuffPo had on Larry Sinclair (I googled his name and this was the first article that came up):
“
Obama Accuser Larry Sinclair Holds Stupefying Press Conference
It is not often that a political reporter can claim to have witnessed the single most stupefying event on any single day, what with the diversity of inanity on display from coast to coast in an election year. But today, I feel confident laying claim to that dubious distinction, for I attended Larry Sinclair’s Wednesday press conference at the National Press Club.
The event began less than auspiciously for Mr. Sinclair — who has gained Internet notoriety by spreading wild accusations regarding gay sex, drugs and possible murder committed by Barack Obama — as National Press Club staff took pains to remove the association’s logo from behind the podium where Sinclair was set to speak. (Politico’s Ben Smith today detailed Sinclair’s “27-year criminal record, with a specialty in crimes involving deceit.”)
Of course, the club had made clear for some time that it should not be viewed as endorsing Mr. Sinclair’s claims simply for having agreed to host his mind-numbingly preposterous litany — heavens, no! All that could be said for the institution was that it was happy to rent out its space to anyone who might be willing to pay in order to switch on the microphone.
And pay Sinclair has — for the venue and its microphone, as well as for a kilted lawyer (with a suspended license) named Montgomery Blair Sibley, who informed those assembled that his preferences in dress were arrived at as a way to secure comfort for his unusually large sexual organs. “I don’t know why men wear pants,” he said with a poker face. “It’s a function of male genitalia. If you’re size normal or smaller, you’re probably comfortable with [pants]. ... Those at the other end of the spectrum find them quite confining.”
“I asked him to wear a suit and tie,” Mr. Sinclair said ruefully. Then, he admitted to suffering from a brain tumor.
Only slightly less mystifying were the several dozen assembled journalists who seemed to grant Mr. Sinclair some modicum of respect with their questions. They cross-examined his statement regarding his supposed meetings with the Illinois Democrat with a vigor and small-bore attention to detail that prosecutors reserve strictly for witnesses who are sane. Imagine if you were to encounter someone who had lit himself on fire, and then proceeded to ask which brand of gasoline he favored.
And so the inquiries came, most of which Mr. Sinclair easily batted back with the exhortation to investigate his claims more vigorously. As for the evidence he provided, it amounted to a few phone numbers — registered under different names and in different states — that Mr. Sinclair claimed he used to call, variously, a limousine driver, the deceased choir director of Trinity United Church of Christ, and others. Clearly, it is now the duty of the mobile phone companies to open up these records to court scrutiny. (Forgive me for not reprinting any of the “evidence” in full here. Should you care to see it, Sinclair promised a version would be made public on his website, one free of the several errors which vexed him during his public statement today.)
“I expect you to ask me questions,” Sinclair told the reporters. “I expect you to do your job, and actually find facts as opposed to looking at DailyKos or FireDogLake or Huffington Post or all of these pro-Obama sites.”
When a questioner asked Mr. Sinclair whether he would permit review of his mental health records “for more than 30 minutes” — in a lame attempt to riff on the restrictions imposed by John McCain’s campaign — Sinclair mumbled for a few moments, unaware of the reference.
When he was clued in, Mr. Sinclair shrugged and said: “You can see where my head is today.”
To borrow a phrase: yes, we can.”
If so, he is worse than anything ever dreamed of. Remember, he has come out of relative obscurity, and has “stories” for all the events in his life, professing Christianity, when in fact, he was raised a Muslim and carries the name of Mohammed.
That was no accident. I don’t doubt for a minute that he smokes and snorts coke, and I don’t doubt for a minute that somewhere, in his finances, is a trail of big money that comes from “nowhere.”
When the source is found, and I hope it happens before August, his secrets will be bared. The problem by then will be whether people WANT to believe how dangerous he is. He’s running on a campaign of “change” but I definitely do NOT want the change he has planned for us.
Comment:
Are you defending Obama?
Obama,has a history of associating with the dregs of Chicago.
Obama has also shown time and again a lack of ability to judge the character of his closest friends, confidants and coworkers, so what makes you so adamant that this mans story has no legs.
In the comments someone makes noise about the slander issues involved. I wonder why BO hasn’t done anything about it. The obvious answer to that is “disclosure”.
Did you know that he brought his lawyer who was wearing a Kilt?
When reporters asked why, LS’s lawyer replied that he has certain large male organ and he is uncomfortable wearing pants.
Then LS told reporters that he had instructed the Lawyer to wear the pants.
Only thing better than this for Obama would be that LS and his Lawyer ENDORSE McCain on their website.
“Could he in fact be the Manchurian Candidate?”
No, he is the Muslim candidate.
BUMP!
Go, Larry, GO!!
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/obama-absent-from-november-4-1999-illinois-senate-larry-sinclair-cocaine-allegations-larry-sinclair-lawsuit/
That is downright funny stuff. You can’t make it up.
Why would a limo driver be calling a state elected offcial to do drugs and sex with a stranger anyway?
Yes, ludicrous. Unless B-Hussein-O is completely nuts, stupid and self-destructive. Which he might be. I wonder who the driver with the Indian name is and how he knows the senator.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.