Posted on 05/13/2008 8:40:13 AM PDT by pissant
He looks like a poofer to me.
Of course he could. But it will take someone just a little more, ummmm, "credible" than Larry Sinclair to convince me. But I'm skeptical that way.
Otherwise, this is all just a bunch of stupid, counter-productive noise that takes attention away from Obama's failed policies & plans.
How embarrassing. If Obama were any good he wouldn’t have to pay for oral sex.
LOL. Sorry if you can’t multi-task with your attention.
But I reckon that someone that has legal documents in front of the Minnesota District Court, the DC District Court and the Chicago PD is certainly a verifiable fraud.
He didn’t pay. Larry wasn’t a prostitute, just a run of the mill poofer.
Yeah, and OJ was innocent.
Tell me, if this same guy was making the same accusations & filing the same papers against GWB, what would you think of his credibility?
I would doubt it, based not on the charges, but upon what I know about GWB. IF this was a charge against Larry Craig, I’d likely believe him.
Especially since he is willing to identify the limo driver to the national media, has posted hotel receipts for his stay in Chicago (during which Obama was absent from the legislature), has given the Chicago PD his phone info to verify calls from Donald Young (how would Obama’s gay, murdered choir director get Larry’s phone number), put himself in legal jeopardy if filing false accusations in two courts of law, gave a signed affadavit to the Chicago PD, and sounded absolutely believable in his interviews.
Could it all be a hoax perpetrated by Obama’s enemies or just a lone nut out to gain 15 minutes of fame? Sure. But that seems very unlikely, and Larry will be subject to prosecution if he is a fraud.
Now what are the chances that Obama has had gay sex and smoked crack in 1999?
His first lawsuit, in Minnesota federal court, was dismissed because it was such a mess, due to his trying to represent himself. And it was dismissed by a Reagan appointee.
Amazing how Mr. Credibility couldn't find ONE lawyer to represent him. You'd think attorneys would be falling all over themselves to represent him & make names for themselves. Perhaps they've heard of Rule 11?
His lawsuit in DC District Court is a defamation lawsuit stemming from comments made online after he first revealed his allegations. That lawsuit has nothing to do with the heart of his story/stories about Obama.
He restates the allegations against Obama in the DC case. It has everything to do with the defendants smearing him for allegedly telling the truth about Obama.
Ever think it could be the work of Obama supporters? The left are notorious for putting out deliberate misinformation and wacky conspiracy theories in an effort to discredit every other charge being made against one of their own, particularly the legitimate ones. They did this with Jane Fonda and with Hillary Clinton. Here below are the details on the 'hoax' story regarding Hillary and the Black Panthers (it wasn't really a hoax but an intentional distortion of the truth meant to dismiss the real story in the public eye):
Hillary and the Black Panthers: The Real Story
Richard Poe
Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2003
I can't take it anymore. If one more person sends me that e-mail about Hillary and the Black Panthers, I'll have to be dragged away screaming in a straitjacket.
You know the e-mail I'm talking about. It accuses Hillary of helping the Black Panthers get away with torture and murder during the early 1970s. With the 2004 presidential race drawing near, the spam mills are creaking to life, flooding the Internet once more with this agitprop classic.
Unfortunately, the e-mail mingles good information with bad, sowing more confusion than enlightenment. Some versions, for instance, carry the byline of radio talk jock Paul Harvey, who says he did not write it. Such misrepresentations help Hillary defenders dismiss the e-mail as a hoax.
The story is no hoax, though. Its basic elements can be found in respected Hillary biographies and exposes such as Barbara Olson's "Hell to Pay," David Brock's "The Seduction of Hillary Rodham," Joyce Milton's "The First Partner" and Carl Limbacher's "Hillary's Scheme."
Here are the facts:
In May 1969, fishermen discovered the body of Black Panther Alex Rackley floating in Connecticut's Coginchaug River. Rackley's captors had clubbed him, burned him with cigarettes, scalded him with boiling water and stabbed him with an ice pick before finally shooting him in the head.
New Haven detectives learned that the Panthers suspected Rackley of being a police informer. Panther enforcers had tied him to a chair and tortured him for hours. Police arrested eight Panthers and later extradited Panther leader Bobby Seale from California, after a witness accused Seale of ordering Rackley's death. (1)
Campus radicals supported the Panthers. They organized mass protests in support of the so-called "New Haven Nine." Hillary was right in the thick of it.
By the time she entered Yale Law School in 1969, Hillary was already a radical celebrity on campus. Life magazine had featured Hillary in a piece titled, "The Class of '69," which showcased three student activists whom Life's editors deemed the best and brightest of the year. A line Hillary used in her Wellesley College commencement speech appeared under her photo: "Protest is an attempt to forge an identity." (2)
At Yale, Hillary helped edit the Yale Review of Law and Social Action – a left-wing journal which promoted cop-killing and featured cartoons of pig-faced police. (3)
A series of hard-Left mentors introduced Hillary to the brass-knuckle realities of revolutionary activism. As a Wellesley undergraduate, she met and interviewed radical organizer Saul Alinsky, whose Machiavellian tactics she admired. Hillary's senior thesis supported Alinsky's call for class warfare. (4)
At Yale, Hillary found a new Svengali in the form of left-wing law professor Thomas Emerson, known around campus as "Tommy the Commie." Emerson recruited Hillary and other students to help monitor the trial of the New Haven Nine for civil rights violations. Hillary took charge of the operation, scheduling the students in shifts, so that student monitors would always be present in the courtroom. She befriended and worked closely with Panther lawyer Charles Garry. (5)
Some believe that the enormous pressure exerted by the Left helped ensure light sentences for the New Haven Nine. Whether or not this is true, the punishments were mild.
"Only one of the killers was still in prison in 1977," reports John McCaslin in the Washington Times. "The gunman, Warren Kimbro, got a Harvard scholarship and became an assistant dean at Eastern Connecticut State College. Ericka Huggins, who boiled the water for Mr. Rackley's torture, got elected to a California school board." (6)
Hillary's defenders argue that she played no "significant" role in the New Haven Nine's defense. This is semantic hairsplitting. Obviously, Hillary was less "significant" than Charles Garry or "Tommy the Commie" Emerson. But Hillary served as a trusted lieutenant to these movers and shakers. Moreover, she had a national profile as a campus activist. Hillary was no rank-and-file student protester, as her apologists claim.
Indeed, Hillary's work for the Panthers won her a summer internship at the Berkeley office of attorney Robert Treuhaft in 1972. A hardline Stalinist, Treuhaft had quit the Communist Party in 1958 only because it was losing members and no longer provided a good platform for his activism. (7) "Treuhaft is a man who dedicated his entire legal career to advancing the agenda of the Soviet Communist Party and the KGB," notes historian Stephen Schwartz. (8)
The defense of the New Haven Nine marked Hillary's initiation into the sinister underworld of the hard-core, revolutionary Left. To my knowledge, Hillary has never publicly renounced nor apologized for her role in that movement.
Richard Poe is a New York Times best-selling author and cyberjournalist. For more information on Poe and his writings, visit his Web site, RichardPoe.com. He may be reached at richardpoe@....
References
1. Joyce Milton, The First Partner: Hillary Rodham Clinton. William, Morrow and Company, Inc., New York, 1999, p. 35. Barbara Olson, Hell to Pay: The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham Clinton. Regnery Publishing, Washington, D.C., 1999, p. 55.
2. Milton, 1999, p. 34; Olson, 1999, pp. 40-45.
3. Olson, 1999, p. 59-61; Evan Gahr, "Hillary and the Cop-Bashers: Will the Real Ms. Rodham Please Stand Up?" JewishWorldReview.com, June 20, 2000.
4. David Brock, The Seduction of Hillary Rodham. The Free Press, New York, 1996, pp. 14-17; Olson, 1999, pp. 46, 48, 50.
5. Milton, 1999, p. 17; Brock, 1996, pp. 31-32; Olson, 1999, p. 54-56.
6. John McCaslin, "Hillary for the Defense." Inside the Beltway, The Washington Times, June 12, 1998, p. A9.
7. Olson, 1999, pp. 56-57.
8. Brock, 1996, p. 33.
Anything is possible. But it seems unlikely. If he wasn’t filing lawsuits and signing affadavits, I’d tend to believe the conspiracy theory a bit more.
Perhaps there is some truth to it then? We'll see.
Heh... Lancey Howard’s link is amusing, but *blue language* by Bill O’Reilly...
Jeremiah Wright’s Controversial AIDS Charge [KGB connection]
Accuracy In Media (AIM) | April 28, 2008 | Cliff Kincaid
Posted on 05/13/2008 5:03:52 AM PDT by Eye On The Left
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2015183/posts
Obumpa bam
Don’t know if he’s OK at the moment, but he’s a prime candidate for the “bi-directional departure” experience. Were I he (God forbid) I would be very careful.
LOL. Ya gotta love it.
Bwahahaha..”I think y’all need to be honest with the American people and tell them that y’all like to pee on each other...”
Too effin’ funny.
Surely a classic
Go, Larry, GO!
BTTT
Hillary knows this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.