Posted on 04/26/2008 12:06:54 PM PDT by abb
The ganglia of information distribution lives on.
ping
http://blog.georgetownvoice.com/2008/04/26/more-cooney-analysis/
ver happened to Georgetown
Apr 26 2008
More Cooney analysis
Posted by: Tim Fernholz in Campus News, Crime
Some commenters who read this post on the U.S. Attorney’s decision to drop charges against Philip Cooney (MSB ‘10) want more clarification about that decision and the reporting in my recent article on the subject, and I’m happy to oblige (sorry it took so long, but it is, after all, the last week of school). Keep in mind that this analysis is only based on my reporting on the case since last fall and a four month stint working at a legal magazine covering a variety of court cases, so nothing in here is gospel.
First of all, why drop the charges now, after so long? Channing Phillips, the Principal Assistant U.S. Attorney (essentially the second-in-command of the office), explains it sufficiently in this quote from my article:
“To support the filing of a criminal charge, the standard of proof is probable cause. To obtain a conviction, though, the standard is much higher, that is, proof beyond a reasonable doubt, which is why with every case we continue to investigate,” Channing Phillips, Principal Assistant U.S. Attorney, wrote in an e-mail.
Basically, it’s easier to charge someone with a crime than convict them of it. That’s the legal standard on the books. At some point in the discovery process (as both sides marshall their evidence and present it to each other before trial), the attorneys prosecuting the case decided that they couldn’t clear that second standard, which Professor Paul Rothstein of the Georgetown Law Center told me could be represented as being more than 90 percent sure a person committed the crime.
The pulled thread contained personal data on YVONNE YVETTE YOCOM.
I too am thinking a phone call to the FBI. Coincidentally - or maybe not - the HS site is hinky.
“Coincidentally - or maybe not - the HS site is hinky.”
???
http://www.johnincarolina.com/
Saturday, April 26, 2008
DA candidate Cline’s Duke lacrosse “explanations” (Post 1)
(This is the first of a series of posts reporting and commenting on the many “explanations” Durham’s current cheif assisstant district attorney Tracey Cline has given concerning her involvement in the attempted frame-up of three innocent Duke students and the ongoing cover-up of that attempt.
Much that Cline has said about her involvement is contradicted by other evidence. And Cline’s own explanations of what she did and didn’t do are in some instances self-contradicting.
Cline is currently the front-runner in a four-way race for the Democratic Party’s Durham DA nomination. The primary election will be held Tuesday, May 6.
snip
The Durm Herald-Sun. Can’t access the site.
I am able to access the HS.
Make that WAS able to.
Server Error
The server encountered an internal error and was unable to complete your request.
Could not connect to JRun Server.
We should have hunted IMHO down long ago and shot her like the mad dog that she is. And you know what a vindictive SOB I am - I would have enjoyed doing the deed.
Metaphorically speaking, of course.
A call to the FBI would be a good start. :)
Damn, I am spending way too much time in the yard admiring my fescue...I miss everything.
Is anyone able to sign into LS?
Not to my knowledge.
/
Yvonne???
http://www.almadentimes.com/052605/snack.htm
http://www.almadentimes.com/052605/images/DSC03879.jpg
Hinky stuff at LS, too.
Report To Admin
Sydney Carton
Hero Member
*****
Rate Post +20/-43
Online Online
Posts: 1113
Hackers
« Sent to: abb on: Today at 03:20:48 PM »
Reply with quote Reply Remove this message
There is something even stranger going on here .
I and two of my correspondents received the first of the Justice letters with the additional information( as I read it) that IMHO was authoring the letter.
Now,we have a new letter posted identifying Immie as the culprit!
The thing is that the only link between the three recipients of my letter is that the other two were nearly side by side on my Christmas list and replied nearly simultaneously.Only someone who had dipped into my correspondence could have linked these three names.One of them hasn’t communicated with the board for nearly two years.
Ergo: It must be the hacker who is sending this stuff.
Lord knows what further damage he/she/they can wreck with fake communications.
I have to sign off at five p.m. for the weekend.Can you get this information to Tony and Baldo iif they don’t already have it.
All the best,
Sydney
California Divorce Index, 1966-1984
about Yvonne I Hurley
Name: Yvonne I Hurley
Spouse Name: Stephen M
Location: Alameda
Date: 25 Feb 1982
There is a Steven Michael Hurley assoc with her on Veromi, this must be her....
TL now under attack. This afternoon’s thread wiped out.
Viva Las Vegas wedding
Nevada Marriage Index, 1956-2005
about Yvonne Irene Hopper
Name: Yvonne Irene Hopper
Gender: Male
Spouse: Stephen Michael Hurley
Marriage Date: 16 Jun 1974
Marriage County: Clark
Officiant type: Civil celebrant
Recorded date: 21 Jun 1974
Recorded county: Clark
Book: 440
Instrument number: 745531
Has anyone visited the batcave?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
