Skip to comments.
DailyKos to Dems: Vote Romney!
WND ^
| 1-11-08
Posted on 01/11/2008 4:03:48 PM PST by hope
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
What a surprise!!!
1
posted on
01/11/2008 4:03:49 PM PST
by
hope
To: hope
They think Romney is the weak one?
So does that mean they think Fred is the strong candidate? If that is now the case, I’d have to agree with them. If they think it’s Huckabeta, they’d be wrong.
2
posted on
01/11/2008 4:06:18 PM PST
by
madison10
To: hope
This is why Alaska has a closed primary. Neither side should meddle with the election process of the other.
3
posted on
01/11/2008 4:07:46 PM PST
by
AlaskaErik
(I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
To: hope
Is this further proof that there is no difference between the Democratic candidates? No need even to vote. Any will do.
4
posted on
01/11/2008 4:07:51 PM PST
by
kc8ukw
To: hope
The Huckster would assure a 40 state Democrat sweep. A Romney win might actually give Fred a shot in South Carolina so the Dumbocrats aren’t thinking about the next move.
5
posted on
01/11/2008 4:08:04 PM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: hope
6
posted on
01/11/2008 4:09:17 PM PST
by
Jet Jaguar
(Who would the terrorists vote for?)
To: AlaskaErik
These people aren’t the sharpest tools in the shed. Romney would clearly be harder for Democrats to beat in November than Huckabee, despite what current head-to-head polls indicate.
7
posted on
01/11/2008 4:10:35 PM PST
by
Azzurri
To: hope
It’s Fred or bust for me. If you think that Rudy or Huck is a better candidate then you need to go back and look at what you stand for.
8
posted on
01/11/2008 4:10:47 PM PST
by
Jaysun
(It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
To: Jaysun
Its Fred or bust for me. Me too. If either Rudy or Mitt are the nominee, I'm taking my vote somewhere else.
9
posted on
01/11/2008 4:13:20 PM PST
by
AlaskaErik
(I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
To: hope
10
posted on
01/11/2008 4:13:22 PM PST
by
rfp1234
(Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
To: hope
I could deal with Mitt, if only he could really decide what he stood for and stand by it for sure. I don’t quite trust him, but I’d rather have him than any of the Democratic candidates. Thompson would be ideal, though. I would love to see him up.
To: hope
12
posted on
01/11/2008 4:15:58 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Vigilanteman
They don’t want their supporters to vote for Romney because they view him as the weakest candidate. They want the Republican candidates to continue their battle, trashing each other and using up resources in their primary battles.
If Romney wins Michigan, that will give a winning state to each of the top three: Huckabee in Iowa, McCain in New Hampshire, and Romney in Michigan. This will keep them battling. If McCain or Huckabee win Michigan, Romney may pull out.
13
posted on
01/11/2008 4:15:59 PM PST
by
FFranco
To: AlaskaErik
Me too. If either Rudy or Mitt are the nominee, I'm taking my vote somewhere else.
Me too. I'll sit at home and have hot dogs if it's anyone other than Fred (or Duncan, but he seems out). And these "but you'll elect a Democrap" people can kiss my a**. No sir. I'm a Conservative. If we back some of these other fools we're idiots. The Conservative message and platform has never been considered popular or "electable" but that's nonsense. We've seen true Conservative candidates not only get elected but stomp the competition.
Other's can buy into the "move to the middle" (aka left) nonsense if they want to. But it's B.S. and I'll have no part of it.
14
posted on
01/11/2008 4:17:55 PM PST
by
Jaysun
(It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
To: AlaskaErik
15
posted on
01/11/2008 4:19:15 PM PST
by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
To: FFranco
>
If McCain or Huckabee win Michigan, Romney may pull out. <
Not likely if Romney remains no. 1 or no. 2 in the delegate count.
16
posted on
01/11/2008 4:20:33 PM PST
by
Hawthorn
To: AlaskaErik
Primaries should be closed, period. Party declarations should also precede the primaries by 30 days; no more than 1 switch per year allowed. THEN when people vote they should have to show a valid govt-issue ID and dip their fingers in purple ink.
Any open primary/caucus results at this point should not count. And,for once I am cheering Kucinich for challenging the primary in New Hampshire.
17
posted on
01/11/2008 4:21:00 PM PST
by
EDINVA
To: hope
Fred08.com is almost at $750,000 for SC. The goal by today was $500,000.
18
posted on
01/11/2008 4:21:02 PM PST
by
manic4organic
(Send a care package through USO today.)
To: hope
I’m no Romney fan but Romney isn’t exactly the candidate that would be easiest to beat.
19
posted on
01/11/2008 4:21:12 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
To: hope
DailyKos to Dems: Vote Romney!
Interesting...its the same mantra of some of our more liberal brethren here on FR.
U.S. Army Retired |
20
posted on
01/11/2008 4:21:33 PM PST
by
big'ol_freeper
(REAGAN: "..party..must represent certain fundamental beliefs [not] compromised..[for] expediency")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson