Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/10/2007 11:25:52 AM PST by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: theothercheek
If the Supremes pull another Kelo (a decision that guts an enumerated Constitutional right), then this will be the top issue in Presidential election in the Red States.
118 posted on 11/11/2007 5:59:02 PM PST by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: theothercheek
The version that Congress approved in 1789 had three commas, while several states ratified a two-comma version.

I never heard of a two comma version until someone pointed out that the Parker ruling at the Circuit court had two different versions, one of which had two commas, the other three. The version that appears in the United States Statutes at Large contains only one. A little additional research reveals that I'm wrong and there were one,two and three comma versions. But since whatever the original had, more could have been added, or some left out, in the process of hand copying the document for sending to the states for ratification, this is not very suprising. The same probably happened to the rest of the BoR, but no one particularly wants to ignore them or at least change their basic meaning..

119 posted on 11/11/2007 8:46:43 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: theothercheek
Are Our Second Amendment Rights Hanging On A Comma?

In the final analysis, they hang on our willingness to use them. Hopefully only in a deterrent mode, but should deterrence fail.... see tag line.

120 posted on 11/11/2007 8:55:11 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: theothercheek; Tabi Katz
Today's copyeditor would definitely take out the third comma.

I would take out the first as well, since the following phrase is restrictive (essential to the meaning of what precedes it), not nonrestrictive (parenthetical), although I still see many passages punctuated this way.

The middle one I think everyone would keep. For now.

131 posted on 11/12/2007 11:28:55 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson