Posted on 08/29/2007 10:21:01 AM PDT by Balt
WOW !!!!!....This Craig story has hidden Hillary’s latest campaign finance problems for three days.Will the Craig story last beyound her 7 Sep 2007 court date????????????.....
I saw it. He’s gay. Case closed.
How do we know there was a hand under the partition? Because the cop says so? That’s not good enough for me.
____________
OK. Fair enough.
So is it anytime that there is only one eyewitness to a crime that you doubt the eyewitness, or only when it is a cop, or only when an allegedly conservative senator is in the crosshairs?
Well, I also opposed the Clinton empeachment - I agreed with Renquist that it wasn't what the empeachment law is for. So, it's not because Craig is conservative. But...
Note to everyone: I surrender. Hang him high. I guess it's like traffic court. You can dispute what the patrolman says, but since he's the only "trained observer" on the scene, only his word counts. Besides, his U-tube video shows him to be gay. All I'm saying, as a quasi-libertarnian, is that what goes around comes around. If we throw him out because he seems gay, can someone else through someone else out because he's pro-life? After all, abortion is a right according to the courts, isn't it?
Now I'm getting rediculous. As I said, I surrender. Lynch him.
Yes, the guilty plea is enough. That is what I have been saying. The man is an idiot for pleading guilty and stupidity is enough of a reason to ask him to resign.
Despite what some Freepers think, not every gay dude trolls bathrooms for free sex. If Barney Frank was caught doing that, we would be demanding he be expelled. We should act no different here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.