Posted on 07/23/2007 6:04:09 AM PDT by pissant
Make sure to post it! :)
If only you could be so lucky.
Slow news day?
Fred T voted for McCain-Feingold and now runs and hides. Romney is out there boldly working his tail off on the campaign trail.
So, we have Mitt to blame when our favorite television shows are pre-empted by speed skating time trials?
Good to know...good to know. :)
Fred was just lucky he was not in the last debate. He’d be tarred forever as being from the Kennedy wing of the party.
So far there are zero detailed responses from the Fredheads on why Ft is worthy.
I’ll offer one. He’s well known from appearing in movies like Die Hard 2 and as a regular character on LA Law. Counts for something in tems of name recognition.
As for the rest of his record and career......
I’m still waiting for the chatter to settle down. I’m sure the list of rreasosn will be substantial. ;o)
We do have some lovely parting gifts for you though.
I think its a good thing for Fred to have waited. Give em a chance to gin up some answers to some dangling issues before the his bebutante party.
Stuff it, RudyBooster. Fred Thompson’s ‘worthiness’ has been the topic of hundreds, if not thousands of threads here at FreeRepublic.
We don’t feel any need to repeat it just because mittant and pissant tell us we should. We won’t do it for the NYC drag queen either.
Fred was one of those who helped Bill Clinton get off the hook during impeachment. Romney wasn’t one of those. Refer to: “Sell Out” by David Schippers. Fred “sold out” by letting Clinton off the hook on the perjury count - and we all know Bill Clinton lied under oath. We all know that. Hello!
I hate to break the news to you but Duncan Hunter is not really running for President unlike his supporters he’s smart enough to know he’s not gonna win. What he is running for is a cabinet post or best possible scenerio VP.
As I said Fred voted FOR McCain-Feingold. Romney did not. You cannot argue with that, FReeper pal.
Nope. If he loses, that may be the result. But trust me, he’s in it to win.
Yes, we do know that he lied under oath. Why, then wasn’t the house’s charge drawn up properly?
Fred details it quite well here:
http://www.australianpolitics.com/usa/clinton/trial/statements/thompson.shtml
I can keep knocking down your BS claims all day or you can stop making them. Your choice.
I like Duncan Hunter but this is supposed to be about why Fred T is superior to Mitt Romney - and so far, no one has a clue.
That's a lie.
Fred “sold out” by letting Clinton off the hook on the perjury count - and we all know Bill Clinton lied under oath.
Fred's point was that Clinton's perjury was not impeachable.
That is factually incorrect, and oft rebutted here on F.R.
Here is Freds’ ACTUAL (as opposed to the fictional versions so oft repeated -— generally by Ron Paul supporters) stand on the issue of Clinton’s impeachment (in Fred’s own words):
http://australianpolitics.com/usa/clinton/trial/statements/thompson.shtml
That is factually incorrect, and oft rebutted here on F.R.
Here is Freds’ ACTUAL (as opposed to the fictional versions so oft repeated -— generally by Ron Paul supporters) stand on the issue of Clinton’s impeachment (in Fred’s own words):
http://australianpolitics.com/usa/clinton/trial/statements/thompson.shtml
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.