Posted on 07/08/2007 10:39:01 AM PDT by nancyvideo
The Sex Positive Agenda opposes abstinence not because it doesn’t work but because the educrats see sexual activity as a birthright that all should engage in right now.
The homosexual agenda is just the battering ram to society’s laws and morals for the sex positive agenda which seeks to end all moral judgements over sexual pairings regardless of sex, age, marital status, relation, number, or species of partner(s).
Note the language of keeping details “private” (ie. we won’t tell your parents) and “know your legal rights” and “Just say yes” (quote: “because they are tired of people telling teens what they can and can’t do”).
http://www.ahwg.net/resources/New%20Resources%20FOR%20YOUTH.pdf
The State wants to corrupt your kids minds.
The Lawrence v. Texas case wasn't about consenting adults in private. It was about norming homosexuality for everyone (minors including) and pushing it down the throats of everyone, not leaving it "in the bedroom". It is taught in public institutions.
Is this how Americans are handling the the nation's fall? just avoid the issue?
Sorry I just feel like laughing - I can imagine the headline reading "England Increases Tea Tax" and then someone saying "oh well... another reason to drink coffee."
What ever happened to live free or die?
Liberal school boards, yes, but they are prodded and coached and bribed by the biggest communist force in the country, (well one of them) and that is The Teachers Union!! Watch some of their rallies online, or read their websites. I have even heard some teachers themselves saying they are shocked by this organization. It seems they have been infiltrated over the years by the most radical perverts ever to walk the planet!
Everyone or the people who think like you? Sorry, I'd fight such a decree tooth and nail. It's the very antithesis of liberty.
As for fascism I doubt you even understand what the word means.
I know exactly what it means. It's a system of government where the needs of the individual is subordinate to the state. It's a rather new political term, having arisin under Mussolini, which his regime is still the benchmark of fascism. What you want my friend is fascism. You want the big ol' government to tell us little people how to live. Wehn the government gets involved in the sex lives of its citizens, you know it's crossed the line.
I’m reminded of the endless Democrat caterwauling about THE SACRED RIGHT TO CHOOSE!!! THE SACRED RIGHT TO CHOOSE!!! As usual with these totalitarians, “the sacred right to choose” only extends to killing fetuses.
How long before the ‘State’ goes around to all home schoolers to insure that parents teach this?
“How long before the State goes around to all home schoolers to insure that parents teach this?”
***************************************************
Then we will have arrived at “lock’n load” time!
Precisely.
Tell ‘em it’s against your religion.
One main defense for kids in this situation is private school, costly though it may be.
I’m fortunate that I live in a fairly conservative area and the teachers here wouldn’t dream of pulling this kind of crap.
You should none the less be watchful of this crap in your schools. Increasingly, the ACLU is suing communities and schools for not teaching it.
You know, there’s a way to pretend to “go along” and still make a point.
If you were to express their behavior in the most vulger terms, while announcing that you approve of it, what could they say?
‘I thing b... f...... is a most wonderful way to express your love for another man!’
one more reason not to hand your kids over to the government...
I agree that is one of many reasons why I home school.
Separation of school and state BUMP!
Then, it would appear that the state bureaucrats have plans to get around eventually to laying the requirement on the private schools "or else".
The phrase "toll of boys" would appear to apply here.
The thing is, these folks think it's unfair that homosexuality be considered a threat to the well-being of society. They think it isn't, and they have convinced themselves that society would be better off if we all just got along -- that if we embraced it as a loveable quirk in human behavior, it would become one.
Of course, that doesn't work because it's false, but ... without biblical instruction, to the average Joe Blow there's no logical reason to think homosexuality is particularly harmful, and that the religious ban on it is only arbitrary, a whim of religious kookery.
Homosexual experimentation among young women used to be very rare, now it is become a right of passage at many schools.
We are leaving our children to a path to chaos and personal destruction all so we can indulge in our kicks and feel tolerant and wrap our bad behavior in the flag because we are afraid to be righteous in the face of liberalism.
You're absolutely right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.