Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

She Squanders Her Divorce Settlement, so He Has to Pay Her Again--30 Years Later!
GlennSacks.com ^ | 7/3/07 | Glenn Sacks

Posted on 07/03/2007 9:52:05 AM PDT by PercivalWalks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: PercivalWalks
Hell, I got nailed for $18,000 in 2000 25 years after my divorce. My x and I made an agreement of no child support if I stayed away from my daughter. She made no attempt to collect the support. Then she suddenly forgot our agreement and took me to court, where the appellate court upheld the magistrate's ruling that I owed her the money. The 2 females on the 3 judge panel ignored precedent while the male judge cited the precedent. I lost. end of story.

Don't expect justice in domestic court if your a man.

21 posted on 07/03/2007 1:01:16 PM PDT by Edgerunner (If leftists don't like it, I do. Keep your powder dry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edgerunner
My x and I made an agreement of no child support if I stayed away from my daughter.

Have you ever spoken to your child?

22 posted on 07/03/2007 1:10:08 PM PDT by donna (Men are the new women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

This is utterly, absolutely, totally frickin’ barking mad daft.

I hope to God my ex-wife doesn’t see it.


23 posted on 07/03/2007 1:19:08 PM PDT by Flatus I. Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

Hard to believe and total BS. She should be left to her fate.


24 posted on 07/03/2007 1:21:01 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edgerunner

I don’t suppose it occurred to you that selling your relationship with your daughter was reprensible.

I’m amazed that the male judge was able to find a precedent that supports what amounts to either an unenforceable or illegal verbal agreement to deprive your daughter of both a father and support.

Sorry you got nailed, but you should have run that idea past a lawyer.


25 posted on 07/03/2007 1:44:12 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Social vs fiscal conservatism? Sorry, I'm not voting my wallet over the broken bodies of the innocen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

My dear lady,

Yes it was reprensible but so was I. I have grown up since then and have a great relationship with my daughter. I was an alcholic and a musician...There are several laws which protect people from undue seisure of assets, so you must not know of these laws. Thank you for you female opinion.


26 posted on 07/03/2007 1:56:10 PM PDT by Edgerunner (If leftists don't like it, I do. Keep your powder dry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Flatus I. Maximus

It won’t talk long for her to find out.


27 posted on 07/03/2007 1:56:23 PM PDT by Orange1998 (4 Real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Edgerunner

I’m glad you have recovered yourself and your relationship with your daughter.

But.... it wasn’t an undue seizure of assets legally speaking. You can’t agree to not pay child support, the laws do not allow it and won’t enforce it and a lawyer should have told you that.

You were on the hook for child support from the moment she was born. That your ex chose to wait till you actually had some ability to pay to collect that debt shows some smarts.

Doesn’t mean the law is wrong or unjust, only that you made decisions that had long term consequences and costs. Chalk it up as making amends.

Divorce is ugly and the children are the ones who pay for adult’s immature behavior. ‘Spect that’s why God hates it so.


28 posted on 07/03/2007 2:23:37 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Social vs fiscal conservatism? Sorry, I'm not voting my wallet over the broken bodies of the innocen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks
This was not a second bite at the cherry, but it is what are her reasonable needs.

So basically the former wife (who caused the divorce in the first place by running off with another man) is asking the courts to give her a "credit card with no limits" (aka her former husband's future wealth)?

That's just...plain wrong (as in unfair)!

29 posted on 07/03/2007 2:30:15 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Sic Semper Tyrannis * U.Va. Engineering '09 * Friends Don't Let Friends Vote Democrat * Fred in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

If this isn’t a red flag for any guy she is currently seeing, I don’t know what is.


30 posted on 07/03/2007 2:35:21 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

Insanity.


31 posted on 07/03/2007 2:51:48 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

She’ll go through this too—then what? What a rip-off, a genuine theft. He’ll have to die to escape the b*tch.


32 posted on 07/04/2007 7:37:38 AM PDT by BamaAndy (Professor Librescu is an American hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

you couldn’t say it any wiser!!!


33 posted on 07/04/2007 7:39:33 AM PDT by HotTubDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson