A devil food is turning our kids into homosexuals

World Net Daily ^ | Dec 12, 2006 | Jim Rutz

[Gabz]

Better watch out, or you'll become feminine.

Actually I think the opposite has happened - I seem to spend my days in work boots and jeans. Both my husband and daughter like seeing me in skirts and heels :)

[dcnd9]

So why do you dismiss anyone else's opinions and/or research, that does not support the FDA's, as charlatan's etc.?

[Silly]

Jim Rutz to soy: "You're the devil!"

Uh, okay, Jim.

/sarc

[Mase]

I don't dismiss everyone. Only those who employ faulty research methodology and those who use that research to further their own political or financial ends. You need to understand that most research today is done to find grant money and not the truth. Also, most of the message today is controlled by extremists who also have a political and/or financial agenda.

To separate what's legitimate from all the nonsense out there requires a substantial education in biochemistry and nutrition as well as having worked in real world situations where the accuracy of your research determines your success in industry. Too many people are quick to believe whatever they see on the internet because it sounds like the researchers know what they're talking about. Most of the time, after critically reviewing the research, it's clear that their conclusions -- although they may show correlations -- don't prove a thing. 95% of research today is meaningless. Mercola is an internet charlatan who is getting rich selling people crap that doesn't perform as advertised. He's been cited several times by the FDA for doing so. The Weston Price Foundation is another organization that's driven by a political agenda and cares nothing about the truth. Fortunately, the FDA, most of the time, creates policy based on sound science. That's reassuring to me in a world filled with food Nazi's, toxic terrorists and nanny staters.

[dcnd9]

A condescending liberal attitude really doesn't add anything to a discussion.

[Mase]

Is that all you've got? I suggested earlier that you believed in something you didn't understand and couldn't explain. You had ample opportunity to prove me wrong and didn't even try. Looks like I was right. Only conservatives believe in things that don't exist? I suppose if you really knew anything about the subject you'd contribute something to the discussion. Instead, all you've done is link us to wacko websites. Nice defense.

[dcnd9]

For those who believe no explanation is needed. For those who don't, no explanation will suffice.
Since I read you as the latter, there was no point in trying to prove "your opinions" wrong.

[Old_Mil]

Personally, I would suspect that childhood obesity has more to do with early menstruation than does soy consumption.