[rhombus]

Censoring comments? These same comments appear ad nauseum.

[bushsupporter30]

Wish I could censure some of the more idiotic comments such as impeachment and such but hasnt every thread been hijacked and we have the usual suspects deriding the president?

[JamesP81]

This links to a ridiculous conspiracy theory that Free Republic is censoring comments that are critical of the Bush Administration's handling of the immigration issue.

These peoplea are abysmally stupid or they are writing an intentional hit piece against FR. I know which one I believe...

[atomicpossum]

Welcome to FR.

[COEXERJ145]

The only morons who have been who have been "censured" are the idiots calling for violence against illegals, attacking other members, or making certain types of comments about the President.

And BTW, this is a private website and the owner can decide what is or is not allowed.

[OPS4]

The point is I really dont care what they think. I for one would zot what I wish, and answer to no one.

This smacks of the polically correst Bull Shxx.
Ops4 God Bless America.

[LachlanMinnesota]

I have often been very opposed to Bush over the immigration issue, and my comments have never been censored.

This seems to be a straw man issue to get people to criticize for its own sake.

[bkepley]

Bushbots...Bushbots nah nah nah nah nah....

[Dr. Ed Bravo]

"matthew" is obviously an idiot.

The two comments weren't exactly sterling either. The 2nd from someone who only claims to have been banned. So what.

I've never seen Free Republic censor real debate.

There are thousands of us who are in complete disagreement with the administration giving amnesty away.

[COEXERJ145]

Oh, and if you don't like it here, there are plenty of anti-FR sites out there for you to join.

I'm sure the Loonies would love to have you on their site. One more person to bash FR ad nauseum.

[brytlea]

Clearly not true, since none of my posts have been deleted, that I know of.
susie

[HHKrepublican_2]

I just posted to his blog telling him how wrong he was.

[ElkGroveDan]

My hunch is, that this post is not long for this world.

So I'll just say, IB4TZ

[VOA]

What censorship?
As a "border troll", I've had no problem.
Just stay away from ad hominens, advocating violence/radicalism and
just shake head at some comments (from either side!).

This is as close as an ordered society can get to a free-for-all.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

FR is not a Republican website. It's a conservative website.

The blog can go take a hike, because I've posted millions of posts critical of Bush's AMNESTY plan and didn't get electrocuted.

[Eagle of Liberty]

Criticize our President? I say we start by criticizing our Senators and then we zot you outta here.

[Jim Robinson]

Free Republic does not condone racism or violence. Those who post racist statements or advocate violence against illegal immigrants get booted and their posts pulled.

This web site supports the war on terror and supports our Commander-in-chief and our troops. We also appreciate the job the president is doing in appointing constitutionalists to the SCOTUS and the federal courts and wish to see this continue. We support these efforts and therefore support the president and support holding and building on the conservative majority by opposing the liberals and RINOS.

Those who come here to trash the president or trash his supporters or advocate for his impeachment or otherwise to work against our objectives here usually get the boot.

Hope that helps.

[Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin]

Somebody's just trying to make a name for themselves. And sounds like some sour grapes are in the mix. Anyway, Bush was looking look pret-ty sorry with his DEMANDS that the ILLEGALS have a guest worker/amnesty/free ride/you can break the law status. But then he added insult to injury when old sly Fox, Mr. PESO MAN, waltzed his sorry little self into our country to stir up trouble, and Bush did nothing, which is an endorsement of Fox's corrupt behavior whether or not Senor Bush wants to see it that way...

[Red Phillips]

Perhaps you should read the site. PoP is a traditionalist/paleoconservative (Kirkean, hence the name Politics of Prudence)website. The site is anti-immigration of course and unlike many at FR it is anti-intervention. But since it is a consciously paleoconservative website that should surprise no one.

Look over the site. Since it is paleo, it is no friend of the current administration, but the articles and debate there are very reasonable and polite.

As a disclaimer, I post there.

[conservativeactivist1776]

Hmmmm.

If you actually read the article at Politics of Prudence, they make no such claim. They are only reporting what Alipac is saying. Alipac is the one making such accusations.