Posted on 05/26/2006 10:47:11 PM PDT by catholicfreeper
I hear ya, switched to EWTN radio or the Bible on CD when driving.
Oh yes. She has a lot of credibility with a statement like this.
Oh, Ms. Anchoress...you mean cleaned up like...McCain-Feingold? Is THAT how the clean-up process that we all trusted so much in is supposed to work?
If those arrogant pieces of bull crap we call Senators allowed an abomination like THAT to get through, we are supposed to trust them to do this correctly?
You live on another damned planet.
Of course one could argue that Mccain Feingold was what the masses wanted out there. We got to get money out of politics bla bla bla. I heard that all the time from the oridnary folks out there. The same ordinary folks that were experts on campaign finance reform are all now experts on illegal immigration. Alot of focus groups and not enough issues.
Of course Mccain Feingold was a tad different. The politcos said "Ah the SUpreme Court will declare most of it Unconstitional" so dont worry. Well thats was a bad plan it seemed. But hey the folks wanted it and got it.
I've read your posts for some time.
Just who are you?
Banned...retread...plant?
A current FReeper?
What?
By all means...go buy a Sat radio,
and leave us alone.
The America of 150 years ago, with a large demand for low skilled labor and virtually no government mandated social spending, could support a class of immigrants because they caused no real net drain on the nation. But what was fine in an age when few attended school and even less graduated is incompatible in an era of high tech business where people who fail to earn a simple high school diploma have virtually no chance to succeed beyond the poverty they were born into.
I don't see how anybody thinks that millions more entitled to benefits they never paid for in the first place will be a net benefit to the economic health of the nation.
But in the end the argument is not about economics. It is about the rule of law. America has always been the most welcoming nation on the face of the globe. But what we demand is that the law is followed. Those who wish entrance abide by the system that we as a nation have set in place. Failure to do so is a slap in the face to those who have shown the patience and fortitude to deal with a system that is both bewildering and glacial in pace.
It sickens me to see the criminal enablers in the left and the cheap and lazy right cry for this Amnesty-through-hoops program in order to secure their own economic security without thought to the effects on the nation as a whole.
I have a suggestion if you don't like my post don't read them. Its pretty simple. Also, I said the level of discourse on this topic and other topics have fallen down. FR is is not the entire conservative Universe so please calm down I wasnt talking about FR in particular.
No, dear.
You are a plant, or a retread, or have been banned before.
You have an agenda.
I've been reading your posts for some time.
You are not nice.
One thing I have always wanted to ask, but given my screen name, have been reluctantant...
Is English your first language?
Well I think this blogger is thinking of America as whole in her arguments. Its been interesting watching her thoughts on this play out. She is where I am at on many issues regarding this. I suspect that I am pretty much where the President is at but realize there will have to be some compromises if anything is to succeed.. I was most intrigued with the first part of her blog entry I guess. The conspiracy talk has been too rampant in all this, and I suppose I feel its taking off the spotlight from issues that each side has.
Have you gone out for cigs because the store is about to close?
"It’s all a plot and a conspiracy, you see…nothing could possibly simply be about stupid and lackluster career politicians trying to finally, finally, finally do something about an issue no one has wanted to touch for 30 years and doing it haphazardly, fearfully and imperfectly, and with the usual suspects trying to add their own flourishes, which must always be batted down, whether the issue is illegal immigration or almost anything else."
So is acnchoress admitting that liberal special-interests wrote this bill or denying the same? Her tortured language makes it impossible to make out.
It's funny that Anchoress is talking about a rant but in fact, Rush made factual point-by-point slams against the Senate CIRA bill and backed them up. Whereas the Anchoress article seems to be a rather content-free rant, filled with the usual suspects of strawman arguements and missing-the-point assertions. #1 missing the point assertions is the usual blather about immigration being great. Ahem, we have 1 million legal immigrants. There is NOT any proposal about cutting that number.
This is about whether we repeat the failed formula of 1986 again, and make ILLEGAL immigration worse, through the failed concept of amensty/legalization.
CIRA doesnt just do that, it has poison pill provisions to undermine enfrocement, gut the immigration courts, assure mexico before we build any wall, regulate wages heavily, allow 60 million immigrants in the next 2 year, quadrupling immigration flows. oh, and it will cost tens of billions a year for this.
A bad bill. Period:
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15145
This is SENATOR SESSIONS whose own staff READ THE ACTUAL BILL AND EXPOSED DOZENS OF HIDDEN PROVISIONS THAT ACTUALLY GUT THE BILLS ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS...
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15165
"It is clear the people who drafted this legislation had an agenda and the agenda was not to meet the expectations of the American people. The agenda was to create a facade and appearance of enforcement, an appearance of toughness in some instances. When you get into the meat of the provisions and get into the bill and study it, tucked away here and there are laws that eviscerate and eliminate the real effectiveness of those provisions. It was carefully done and deliberately done. This is a bill that should not become law."
There are a lot of people, and I am one of them, that stopped trusting the legislature and the executive branch to support the constitution AS THEIR OATHS REQUIRE THEM TO DO the day that McCain-Feingold became law.
It should have NEVER been created. It should Never have got out of committee. It should NEVER have been passed. And it should NEVER have left the President's desk without a veto.
The fact is, that ALL of those things happened. And now we have an egregious violation of the First Amendment. Sure, it will get overturned someday, probably during the next Presidential election cycle.
But if this immigration legislation is passed and approved, overturning it five years down the road is going to be as relevant as tossing a brick in the Grand Canyon.
And we are supposed to trust them to do it right this time? Well, *SOMEONE* in the Senate slipped in a clause to require us to consult with Mexico if and when we build a fence. Really? Consult with Mexico? What in the HELL is that clause supposed to be in there for? Oh sure. Maybe it will come out in a compromise. Maybe it won't. So, the First Amendment is already shat upon by OUR elected officials, our right to act independently as a nation to do things that are in our best interest is on the block now, thanks to Arlen Specter and others.
And this doesn't even address the portion of the legislation that forgives illegals who STOLE and abused the Social Security numbers of Americans. These people who did this used those stolen numbers to open bank accounts and get credit cards. In many cases, the credit standing of many Americans has been completely fouled up and trashed. The Senate may wish to forgive and forget perpetrators of those crimes, but the law abiding US citizen who gets denied a car loan, takes a gander at his or her credit report and sees things mixed up in there that they have no conception of, that person has no recourse! Have you ever tried to fix things like that? I have, and I can tell you, it takes YEARS to do it, to clean out your credit report because some slimeball with the SAME SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER AS YOU decided to live the high life on your number and abscond with the goods without paying.
Please don't take this personally, I don't know you, and I certainly don't know a thing about the Anchoress. I am sure she has relevant and well thought out positions on a variety of subjects (as I am sure you do) and she does make references to the idiotic notion of consulting with Mexico on a fence and Social Security benefits for the illegals.
But to discount out of hand the concerns, and anger that people feel over this issue displays the same arrogance and disdain for others that our elected officials are so explicitly demonstrating for all of us to see.
Ah The famous Tancredo thread lol from I think early this week. I saw a whole blow by blow of that was posted on another forum with a ton of commentary when I surfing the Covervative Forums tonight.. However, I did return to the discussion later on that night.
"Of course one could argue that Mccain Feingold was what the masses wanted out there. We got to get money out of politics bla bla bla."
It's well know --- NOW, after the fact --- that a small number of very liberal foundations, one of them associated with Bill Moyers, put several hundred million dollars into the campaign.
Groups like Soros even admit this about McCain-Fiengold ...
http://www.soros.org/initiatives/gov/articles_publications/articles/between_20020301
Soros.org crowing on their achievement:
"The exception is the Pew Charitable Trusts, which should be commended for supporting research and bipartisan meetings which led to long-needed specific solutions, such as the Snowe-Jeffords compromise on the regulation of issue advocacy advertising."
McCain-Feingold was the hobby-horse of some liberal elitists who wanted to use funding control as a mechanism for political control. Just as immigration is delivery the votes, the mcCain-Feingold agenda is about controlling the debate, and you cant control the debate if groups can simply fund political debate at will. That is so, gee, *free speech* like.
"FOLKS" didnt want campaign finance reform. Specific special interests wanted it.
Likewise, "FOLKS" dont want what the Senate created on immigration. Special interests wrote the bill and wanted the bill to do certain things, to help them achieve particular ends. The folks writing the Seante CIRA bill were the illegal immigration lawyers, LA Raza, and the cheap-labor-lobby among businesses. If you were one of the above, you got what you wanted ... if you are an ordinary American, you are SOL.
I deeply admire Catholicism. That said, this woman is a twit.
I used to live in your neck of the woods.
I KNOW those folks, and you don't represent them well, at all.
"As to being not nice. I have no idea what you are talking about."
Dang! After reading your posts for some time, if we don't agree with you, then we are "nativists", which happens to be the new term for "racists"?
And, you don't know what I am talking about?
"Anyway its much too late to get into one of these Poster bashing sessions at least for me."
LOL!
Coward!
What you don't know is that I am, probably, the least confrontational person here.
The very fact that * I * took you on should tell you something.
You are a sham, and the mods should get rid of you.
It will be a test, for sure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.