Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foxman uncovers conspiracy to "Christianize" America
Don Feder's Cold Steel Caucus report ^ | November 15, 2005 | Don Feder

Posted on 11/15/2005 3:47:04 PM PST by Stepan12

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: golas1964
Hmmm... Belief in God without belief in Jesus makes one a non-Christian I guess.

I wonder if, in the future, the God-haters will be so bold as to tell me how to pray? Will I be prevented from pursuing public office or even employment because I choose to follow a religion?

If this country was 'Christian', and that is a large tent, would a Jew be able to run for public office? Would the state tell him how to pray? Would he be able to find employment?

My faith is stronger than anything that will be said or written to me in a post on this site, as is yours.

My point is, if the founding fathers wanted this to be a 'Christian' country, it would be very clear in the documents they left us and all non-Christians would have been delt with. They did not.

81 posted on 11/15/2005 7:28:23 PM PST by 11Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: stm

Our Founding Fathers were Christians mostly. But Christian values and principles cannot be divorced from their Jewish roots. So the values are Judeo-Christian. And they also viewed it as the Christian thing to leave people free to worship God as they choose, or not at all. We draw from religion its values. We leave to the religious their tenets. That's the deal. Faith is of vital importance and yet no specific faith is endorsed. It's a beautiful thing. Specifics of faith are very important and no one should say otherwise. Let each be true to his own. But in the political arena, we draw from our common values and we leave the particulars to our homes, churches, and communities. God isn't out of the public square; each person is free to express his/her faith how he/she chooses. But the laws of the land remain silent on tenets. The left tries to make that mean that the law must be silent also on values and morality. But that's not true.


82 posted on 11/15/2005 7:30:53 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (The nastiness of evolutionists proves one theological point: human depravity..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Stepan12

Correction. It should be "re-Christianize" America.


83 posted on 11/15/2005 7:31:46 PM PST by bella1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Well stated.


84 posted on 11/15/2005 7:34:01 PM PST by 11Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: 11Bush

There is a separate question here that bears scrutiny. While the framers were clear that the Federal government may not establish a religious institution, there is no question but that the various states may establish churches. Indeed there were a number of state sponsored churches during the early years of our nation.
There is an Evangelical Christian movement in South Carolina to influence the state government in very specific ways. This could include establishing a state sponsored church, requiring that state judges and politicians are church members, and so on.
Now that is a conversation worth having.


85 posted on 11/15/2005 7:47:19 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (THIS IS WAR AND I MEAN TO WIN IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet
There is an Evangelical Christian movement in South Carolina to influence the state government in very specific ways. This could include establishing a state sponsored church, requiring that state judges and politicians are church members, and so on.

Say the moonies, moos, hari krishnas, or any other group achieves majority status in a state, would you want them to be able to establish a state religion?

Nuff said.

86 posted on 11/15/2005 7:57:52 PM PST by 11Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Stepan12; thompsonsjkc; odoso; animoveritas; mercygrace; Laissez-faire capitalist; bellevuesbest; ..

Moral Absolutes Ping.

I love that man. Don Feder is great. I couldn't say anything he said any better. Read the whole thing. You'll be glad you did.

Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.


87 posted on 11/15/2005 8:56:39 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alexander Rubin

A good place for a couple of my favorite quotes:

"...Thomas Jefferson wrote in his Autobiography (1821), the authors of the Virginia Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom refrained from mentioning the exact name of the "holy author of our religion." Here is Jefferson’s explanation for the omission:
Where the preamble declares that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed, by inserting the words "Jesus Christ," so that it should read, "a departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion"; the insertion was rejected by a great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and the Mahometan, the Hindoo, and Infidel of every denomination."---Thomas Jefferson

"Reading, reflection and time have convinced me that the interests
of society require the observation of those moral precepts ... in
which all religions agree." ---Thomas Jefferson



88 posted on 11/15/2005 9:04:26 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: 11Bush

No, not 'nuf said.
Not nearly 'nuf said.
A great deal needs to be said about the rights of the states vs the rights of the Feds. This is the major issue of our time.
The Constitution specifically restricts the Federal government from doing nearly everything it is doing. The innumerated rights are just that, innumerated. They do not include welfare, education, health, housing, the environment, religion, and nearly everything else.
Fact is, the federal government is in violation of the Constitution by usurping States rights specifically protected by the Constitution.
How is that going to be corrected?
As to the issue of domination by the majority, that is precisely how our government is framed, rule by majority with minority protections.


89 posted on 11/15/2005 10:00:45 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (THIS IS WAR AND I MEAN TO WIN IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
I just don't get the stupidity of some of the "Jewish" organizations in regards to Christians.

Many Jews have abandoned God altogether, and placed their faith in socialism.

The Jews condemning Christians, for the most part, are socialist jews. They couldn't give a rat's arse about Israel, or its people.

90 posted on 11/16/2005 3:29:25 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet

No kidding. This guy acts like finding Christ is a bad thing. I happen to take offense to THAT.


91 posted on 11/16/2005 11:25:48 PM PST by Now_is_The_Time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson