Skip to comments.
Fluoride Linked to Bone Cancer, Again
Yahoo Financial News ^
| June 27, 2005
| NYS Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation
Posted on 07/01/2005 3:59:37 AM PDT by nyscof
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
07/01/2005 3:59:39 AM PDT
by
nyscof
To: nyscof
2
posted on
07/01/2005 4:04:52 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: nyscof
I knew it.
3
posted on
07/01/2005 4:06:52 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Washington DC RINO Hunting Guide)
To: nyscof
We even bought fluoride free toothpaste for our children.
The danger has long been known, but in every case it was always.....the government knows best......and the poison was put in the water.
4
posted on
07/01/2005 4:12:34 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(AMERICAN WARS SET MEN FREE)
To: nyscof
Do you have a working link and source for this? Thanks.
To: OldFriend
Junk Science 303 - Flouride's benefits are enormous. Dental problems markedly reduced leading to longer and better lives.
Follow the money - No one gets rich on flouridation or water or toothpaste.
Listen to flouride phobics at your own risk.
6
posted on
07/01/2005 4:17:08 AM PDT
by
stocksthatgoup
(Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion they will give it to you.)
To: OldFriend
Junk Science 303 - Flouride's benefits are enormous. Dental problems markedly reduced leading to longer and better lives.
Follow the money - No one gets rich on flouridation of water or toothpaste.
Listen to flouride phobics at your own risk.
7
posted on
07/01/2005 4:17:41 AM PDT
by
stocksthatgoup
(Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion they will give it to you.)
To: nyscof
The link to cancer may well be the case. However, it is totally irresponsible to report this type of research without giving the reader the opportunity to see what the baseline incidence of the "disease" is. For example, with a large enough epidemiological sample increasing the chances of the disease from 1 in 1 million to 2 in 1 million will be "significant" - but it tells us nothing about the net health benefits and risks.
I am neither for nor against fluoride - I am definitely against bad scientific journalism that drives about rational thinking with fear and hysteria.
8
posted on
07/01/2005 4:20:19 AM PDT
by
bjc
(Check the data!!)
To: bmwcyle
It saps our precious bodily fluids...
9
posted on
07/01/2005 4:25:26 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES!!)
To: bmwcyle
To: OldFriend
The lede paragraph says it all:
Osteosarcoma is a RARE form of bone cancer.
Thus, after 50+years and billions of exposures to flouride, it seldom appears in the exposed population.
The causative link is imaginary. More scientific moonbat-ery.
11
posted on
07/01/2005 4:32:55 AM PDT
by
plangent
To: stocksthatgoup
That's OK. The NAS also recently rejected the LNT hypothesis. Follow the money. See my tagline.
12
posted on
07/01/2005 4:33:34 AM PDT
by
dhuffman@awod.com
(The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
To: plangent
The benefits are imaginary.
13
posted on
07/01/2005 4:35:08 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(AMERICAN WARS SET MEN FREE)
To: stocksthatgoup
It certainly looks like it is junk science. I just took a quick look at one of the cited studies listed on the link provided on the original article. After selectively extracting quotes from the study that supported the possible link between fluoridation the editors of the site omitted the studies conclusions:
In summary, analysis of incidence data from the SEER program has revealed some age- and sex-specific increases over time for bone and joint cancers, and for osteosarcomas, which are more prominent in fluoridated than in non-fluoridated areas.
However, on hrther (sic) analysis these increases are unrelated to the timing of fluoridation, and thus are not linked to the fluoridation of water supplies. (emphasis added) http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/cancer/nci-1990.pdf
Moreover, a quick look at the pattern of numbers indicate that the effects are very small in absolute terms (Base-line incidence rate is 1 in 100,000) and that there is sufficient variance in the numbers that any effects could be caused by chance. Finally, again after a very brief review, the data could be interpreted to suggest that prolonged exposure to fluoride actually reduces the chances of bone cancer!!
14
posted on
07/01/2005 4:48:22 AM PDT
by
bjc
(Check the data!!)
To: bmwcyle
I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.
God willing, we will prevail, in peace and freedom from fear, and in true health, through the purity and essence of our natural... fluids. God bless you all".
15
posted on
07/01/2005 4:49:36 AM PDT
by
Jabba the Nutt
(Jabba the Hutt's bigger, meaner, uglier brother.)
To: plangent
Newly available research, out of Harvard University, links fluoride in tap water, at levels most Americans drink, to osteosarcoma, a rare form of bone cancer. So, perhaps one American in a million is afflicted with it naturally, and because of fluoridation five Americans in a million are afflicted with it. Horrible! But what are the positive effects of the fluoridation on the rest of the million people?
16
posted on
07/01/2005 4:50:31 AM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
To: nyscof
17
posted on
07/01/2005 4:55:15 AM PDT
by
RedRightReturn
(Even a broken clock is right twice a day...)
To: nyscof
18
posted on
07/01/2005 5:06:31 AM PDT
by
js1138
(e unum pluribus)
To: RedRightReturn
No Fluoride & British Dentistry ......... Doesn't everyone want that? (/sarcasm)
19
posted on
07/01/2005 5:07:37 AM PDT
by
stocksthatgoup
(Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion they will give it to you.)
To: stocksthatgoup
British Dentistry on display.
20
posted on
07/01/2005 5:12:19 AM PDT
by
stocksthatgoup
(Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion they will give it to you.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson