Posted on 06/02/2005 4:21:14 PM PDT by Frank Sheed
Lemme clarify that...I'm not the Vaticanisti guy.
The real problem for O'Brien is that he would have been the choice of Pope John Paul II if the USA had not preemptively invaded Iraq. Archbishop O'Brien's military Appointment and his being seen by some on the Vatican side as more "USA Catholic" than "Roman Catholic" (very unjust, I believe) goes against him now. In part geopolitical circumstances have worked against him -- and he made the mistake of appearing emeshed with the USCCB with regard to support for Skylstad (who should be sent out of town blindfolded, sitting backwards, an a mule).
Unless something changes suddenly "Archbishop Chaput goes to Washington" is definitely a coming attraction!
Time for a little digression:
A.)Bruskewicz(sp?) needs to get the red hat soon.
And
B.) Why isn't this on the religion forum?
Dear God, please give us a Catholic archbishop in Washington, DC (and Baltimore, too).
Amen.
In charity, I try not to comment on the individuals involved so I will not give my opinions as such. I posted this solely for discussion and to illustrate that B-16 may be accepting these letters of resignation right away. I did comment on Bishop O'Brien as there as so few Chaplains in the Episcopacy, to have a military man as a major Ordinary would be huge news. I do have biases as to whom I would like to see move to this large Archdiocese, however, if the resignation does get accepted.
I found it interesting to note that this evening, Friday, His Holiness is meeting with both Archbishop Levada and Archbishop Amato, Secretary of the CDF. Clearly, he is planning on making things crystal clear with them on how things will function.
As for why this was not placed on the Religion forum, Trad, it had to do with the URL. The instant I put the URL of the site in and tried to Review it, a message popped up and indicated this had to go onto Chat/Blogger. I would have preferred it to be on Religion.
Frank
p.s. I would be happy to see a military man in Washington. However, I'm a little concerned about what seems to be an exaggerated sense of collegiality in that letter to First Things magazine.
It surprised me that this whole issue was dicussed on the 'World Over Live' on EWTN last night. Raymond Arroyo asked Fr. Richard John Neuhaus if he had heard the rumor pertaining to Bishop Chaput? He confirmed that he had heard it in the "hallway conversations." When Fr. Neuhaus was asked for his comments, he said that the Cardinal might stay on for years if he wished to but that IF the resignation was accepted, that Bishop Chaput would be an excellent candidate. That is a paraphrase of what I heard and is faithful, I think.
Frank
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.