Posted on 05/12/2005 5:55:18 PM PDT by JesseJane
But thanks for the encouragement ;-)
DM... This didn't start with GWB. The more I read, the more I realize what has been developing since the 60's. However, *I* am of the opinion the Clinton administration kicked this into high gear in '94, '95 to ensure they retained the WH, and lock in large electoral states. I know others will disagree and find equal weight contributing to the problem around the spectrum. But, to me, the doors were swung open the caught the Repubs blindsighted...or shortsighted... or well, going to get in on it by going RINO, to straddle the fence and still manage to keep their cushy job in DC. Again, this is just my little rant. I do not blame W for this whole debacle, but I am NOT happy that he has not been forthcoming with the public about this. Both parties will have to answer in 2006. So, it's up to us to make a last ditch effort to make sure only citizens, not legal guests, are able to vote for OUR representation.
I'm not here to argue about where more fault lies, I just wanted to understand what the heck has been going on, and now, how as Americans can we change what appears to be a backroom deal selling us out.
Thanks - and here's one for you. It went up since we have been on this thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1402160/posts
It's about voting... He want's (as does the radical hispanic lobbies) his people to participate in our political process. D/L's are the *magic key* for his government to have voice in ours. GRAND BARGAIN, NO? Look at CA for proof of the influence of the radical lobbies and their freebies to illegals. It has been one of the largest 3 factors bankrupting the states. And now, we see, America is asking for more of the same for the whole country... Bahhhhhhhhhhh.
And about those 'guest workers' shoved at us through the manipulation of the visa program, shall they vote in both countries??
Frank Sharry spoke next. He said that the panel has been working on the report for six months and included a variety of perspectives.
February 15, 2001 minus 6 months = August 15,2000.
Who was president on August 15, 2000?
Since 1994, two-way trade between the U.S. and Mexico has tripled;
Who was president in 1994?
Firstly JJ, the Dems will NEVER "answer" for turning the U.S. into a Third World country. It's always been their goal to begin with -- socialism.
The responsibility for the US maintaining its greatness has always been with the GOP and conservatism to uphold.
In THIS regard, they have not only let us down but President Bush as its leader is LARGELY responsible -- especially in light of 9/11.
Conclusion?
ALL Americans who hold dear the sovereignty of our Republic have been bamboozled and sold moth-eaten bill of goods.
What would past American patriots Washington, Adams, Revere, Henry, Teddy Roosevelt, Pershing, Patton, and McArthur say about a President who actually encourages a foreign invasion?
DO THE MATH.
Oh sure, why not, it will be only one country by then anyway, dontcha know.
:p wahhhhhhhhhhhhhh... ~stabs out eyes after reading that~
But now we're stuck with a lame duck Prez who's blatently undermining U.S. sovereignty at the Mexican border. AND he's got nearly a full term left to wreak havoc as the rest GOP and the Judiciary lie down like dogs.
"Illegal immigration, and the border AND Judges are THE MOST CRITICAL issues for the 2006 election."
Aye!!!...
If W is true to form, bet the farm the pooch will be royally screwed regarding the SCOTUS nominations.
Thanks DM.. But Bush can not make law.. that's the good thing..
Now as far as that pooch is concerned, I'm concerned (as Dachle would say)/s
I like the field in play so far. But I thought I liked Alberto Gonzalez too, and am re-thinking that.
Next week, it's the nuclear option. Either the dems go for up or down vote or it's nuke time. IF, Frist backs down, then we'll know, to 'hide the pooch'.
But, 2006 is around the corner.. and we all must keep the pressure up...turn it up... whatever it takes... to throw BUMS OUT.
Believe me, I understand how steamed you are... me too. We are on the same side brother, even if we don't agree on every single ding-dang point.. :)
This is an excellent post as it clarifies the illegal immigration situation and puts it into perspective.
I disagree with you regarding who kicked this into gear. It is my opinion that George H. Bush started the ball rolling at the end of the first Gulf War. I remember his speeches talking about the One World Order. Before this war GH Bush went to practically every country in the world to get agreements and help for this war. Because so many countries assisted in that war, this was his rationale for the One World Order. He dropped in the polls right after this. He also kept pushing NAFTA in speeches. He tried to deliver NAFTA but failed as the Democrats blocked it.
When Clinton was elected, he pushed NAFTA through with the help of Republicans. I think this is the reason GH Bush and Clinton are so buddy, buddy. There is no doubt in my mind that Hillary is picked as the next President. Whether she will win is another story.
Your links are excellent. Thanks for posting this.
Read this for some background on what is happening.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Spivey/phyllis2.htm
This is an interesting post.
Thank you so much for your post. I have obviously not done my home work on GHWB. Thank you for taking the time to clue me in. I have not yet, but will, read the link you provided.
Only one thing remains holding Clintons feet to the fire, IMO, and that is the lifting of the 'cap' of illegals that would be "allowed" into the country.. Not legal immigrants, but illegals. When I can put my eyeballs back on the document with the accurate dates and figures, I'll post it. However, if memory serves me half well, in '94 Clinton essentially eliminated the 'cap' of illegals from something like 7500 per year to 65,000. Again, essentially the opening of the floodgate. This was done, as I read it, for votes to slam dunk a 2nd term. Then, taking state legislatures was next.. and indeed, that happened in CA. I'm specifically referring to those supported by MALDEF/LARAZA etc. To ensure BlueState Lock. That's how I developed my opinion about Clinton's complicity in this.
But now, you have given me more facts to absorb. Much appreciated.
Thanks.
BTTT for later
That was an excellent link. Thank you; bookmarked as well.
Check this out: It has numbers I've never seen before.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Commentary/com-5_13_05_FH.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.