Posted on 09/30/2004 7:19:03 AM PDT by Warden
He made an analogy in post 252.
It is not a valid analogy.
It is a broad brush statement against all Republicans.
(I don't care about teh broad brush statement about the Dems, 99% of them that I have met WERE communists!)
Maybe he should fix it.
"Provided everyone else agrees with that"
That's like saying "I don't agree with the laws of gravity."
Thanks for summing up the Bush's for us.
WallBuilders offers a comprehensive collection of historical documents, books, videos, CDs, and other products. www.wallbuilders.com
Ton answer your question that started this thread, yes I've heard of the Constitution Party. The platform looks conservative. Compared to the 'we'll spend more of your money on something you don't need and the government doesn't have the right nor responsibility to provide' parties. Or should I say party. For the argument between those two has mainly devolved to who promises the most instead of who will govern the least
Thanks. Let me know if I can help. I'm in Texas and we can't even get on the ballot without 80k signatures. visit: www.LarryKilgore.com
Remember Judge Moore?
The leeser of two evils is still evil. That will be the name of my next post.
Just seeing who rises to the top.
Baptist are responsible for the religeous freedom that we have. They are the ones that got the first amendment added to the constitution. Do your home work. Somewhere on this site it reminds you that "Loose Lips Sink Ships."
Religious Freedom, Not Forced Religion.
You're missing the point entirely. The document still doesn't give any group the right to put their beliefs on display in front of any other.
Loose lips indeed.
The fact that the United States was founded by Christians that instated the recognition to the God of the bible cannot be argued. Those are the facts. You can beat your head against that wall. I will not. If you want to accept the facts and have a conversation about a post Christian USA then I’m game.
If you can't grasp the concept that I don't have to accept your opinion as self-evident truth, we're done.
I know very well who founded this country, and I also know the Constitution protects me from abiding by their definitions of what is moral/immoral, or if I should follow their religious beliefs or not.
Then exhaust yourself in your pursuits. I know I will. I believe what made this nation great can also preserve its greatness. I will go down preaching the truth.
Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.
It took you that long to mull it over and fail so miserably to see what is in front of your eyes?
OKers.
Thought so.
If you had an argument to make, you'd have made it. Now you're just a sorry troll.
"Troll"?
Is that the best you can do?
If YOU had an arguement to make, let alone a point, you'd have made it by now.
Besides, you said you were done.
I experessed an opinion, and allowed that it was just an opinion. You have your own opinion, but won't accept that it is just that.
Besides, you said you were done.
No, I said that if you can't grasp the concept that I don't have to accept your opinion as self evident truth, the we were done. Apparently you can't comprehend either one accurately.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.