Bush lied claims

The Great Hall Forum ^ | 06/28/2004 | Patrick Martin

[GLH3IL]

I've got a pretty good idea how I'm going to reply to all of this, but I'm concerned I might run short of factual resouces to draw from to make effective challenges to this guy's assertions. I would like good, reliable research links to use as factual support to my responses. Anyone have ideas/suggestions on sources I can use to shut this Michael Moore wannabe down? BTW - I'm HEART TAMER 2 on that site.

[onyx]

The link is to a chatroom.
Why bother?

[The Old Hoosier]

Don't waste your time. Instead, call Herman Cain's senate campaign and offer to make calls on your cell phone to Georgia voters on his behalf.

[tx_eggman]

bye bye troll

[Peach]

The links on this thread show that for over 10 years, the press corp wrote about and believed that Iraq and Al Qaeda had forged a deal.

Clinton's Justice Department obtained an indictment against Osama bin Laden in federal court which specifically mentioned the terrorists connections with Saddam Hussein.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1127451/posts

The UN said a week or so ago that they are finding Iraq's WMD all across the globe and that they had been shipped out before, during and after the war began in Iraq. There was a thread about this matter on FR last week.

[roylene]

Agreed, will not make any difference.

[martin_fierro]

Here's your friggin' diorama, Troll.

[Sloth]

LOL

[martin_fierro]

[bondjamesbond]

It's pretty clear this guy is going to vote against George W. Bush. I would limit my efforts to convincing him to vote for Nader. Come up with some examples of where John F'n Kerry was saying the same things Bush was, and at the same time. Tell him that Ralphie-boy is the only real anti-war candidate in the field, now that Dean is gone...

[EggsAckley]

The decision for war with Iraq was made long ago, the intervening time having been spent in an attempt to create the political climate in which US troops could be deployed for an attack.

Sez who...?

[AZamericonnie]

I've got a pretty good idea how I'm going to reply to all of this

So fill us in on your response. Freepers can back you with the factual links

[GLH3IL]

The main thing is to debunk the whole notion that the US had no legal authority to enter Iraq. Once I hurdle the legal justification issue, the rest will be a breeze. The Oil for Food issue will knockout alot of the credibility of France and the UN. For some reason I thought Germany was on the list that was involved with the vouchers....don't see them though.

I've got plenty of ammo to blow away the Iraq had no WMD, Iraq had no links to terror nonsense.

All he's got left after that is that the US is an evil imperial force. Todays events in Iraq will make handy work of that.

[GLH3IL]

Sez 99% of the liberal establishment. I personally think the poster of the alleged "lies" is a communist....he doesn't seem to care much for Bush, Clinton, Kerry...he's a little chat version of Michael Moore.

[GLH3IL]

Am not trolling....just wanna make sure my facts are right before I reply to the nut case

[GLH3IL]

That's cute.....now will ya give me a hand with good info sources for the 1441 question?

[GLH3IL]

I'd like to, but I'm trying to help us find a viable candidate here in Illinois to counter the Democratic candidate Obama Bamamam or whatever the heck his name is. Jim Edger is the best option, but he's not as conservative as I'd like.

[GLH3IL]

*LOL* Not a troll....I was expecting to deal with the troll comments - suprised there aren't more - but the reality is....this IS what the opposition thinks. We can't just call 'em idiots and ignore 'em. We need intelligent responses to this nonsense.

[GLH3IL]

I was listening to a Senate Hearing the other day, I think it was Senator Levin who commented that that particular indictment had been superceded by subsequent ones that omitted the Iraq/al-Qaida link. If that is true, does that ivalidate the reliability of this particular indictiment?

[GLH3IL]

I'm not interested in changing his mind, I'm more interested in making sure that undecideds are not swayed by this garbage. so far I've been pretty sucessful.

Bush's election prospects look good, but if things do come down to the wire, don't we want every voter to be informed of the truth, as opposed to the Michael Moore/George Soros distortions?