Skip to comments.
RIP, IE
Linux Today ^
| 25 June 2004
| Brian Proffitt
Posted on 06/25/2004 7:05:03 PM PDT by ShadowAce
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
view partial source Rocks! It's a must have for FR.
81
posted on
06/25/2004 11:29:26 PM PDT
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: D-fendr
This one don't need no images. Just a page - perhaps the one you visited safely yesterday. If IE or any other browser can render HTML, execute code, then by dumping IE for an alternative brower is a exercise in futility.
82
posted on
06/25/2004 11:34:33 PM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(John Kerry: An old creep, with gray hair, trying to look like he's 30 years old.)
To: ShadowAce; All
Okay, I'm trying Firefox.
My normal way to browse FR is to use the Slave option.
Marked links will be opened in a single "slave" browser window. This allows one to leave open a list of articles in the master window, while reading the articles in a slave window.
Is there a way to have a "slave tab"?
83
posted on
06/25/2004 11:36:18 PM PDT
by
Flyer
(This dog bite me)
To: Drango; ShadowAce
On firefox the right click actually says "view selection source" .
And another question answered:
_____________________________________________________________________
Posted: Jun Tue 22nd 2004 8:32pm
If you want to know what encryption is being used with a specific site, right click and select "page info", or double-click the security icon that appears in the lower-left hand corner.
And, yes. IE supports only up to 128 bit (RC4, I believe). Firefox supports that as well as up to 256-AES (Advanced Encryption Standard - as defined by the United States Government)
84
posted on
06/25/2004 11:36:52 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: All
The bottom portion of my post just above was from the Firefox forum.
85
posted on
06/25/2004 11:38:24 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: BigSkyFreeper
dumping IE for an alternative brower is a exercise in futility.first 'splain to me why it's not futile for this vulnerability.
86
posted on
06/26/2004 1:03:03 AM PDT
by
D-fendr
To: BigSkyFreeper
It's true no browser is perfect, the URL spoof for example also worked in some other browsers; it's just that the IE/Windows combination is way way under the bar.
All the new holes are variations of flaws discovered in the last two years, and play on known weaknesses in Internet Explorer's design, said Larholm. In particular, Microsoft's implementation of "security zones" into which Web pages can be grouped is deeply flawed, as is code in IE for assessing what level of security to apply to a particular Web page URL. Fixing such problems will demand a wholesale reengineering of the often-used Web browser, something Microsoft plans to do in the next major release of Windows, code named "Longhorn," Larholm said.
New IE Holes Defy Latest Patches
I don't think I'd wait for Longhorn to switch browsers.
87
posted on
06/26/2004 1:16:41 AM PDT
by
D-fendr
To: ShadowAce
Add me to the Browser Tech ping list, please. Heck, add me to all your tech lists. :)
88
posted on
06/26/2004 1:41:37 AM PDT
by
Dont Mention the War
(we use the ¡°ml maximize¡± command in Stata to obtain estimates of each aj , bj, and cm.)
To: martin_fierro
"Windows Update" - but that's what ensures the cycle continues ...
89
posted on
06/26/2004 1:49:33 AM PDT
by
Truth666
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
IE supports only up to 128 bit (RC4, I believe). Firefox supports that as well as up to 256-AES (Advanced Encryption Standard - as defined by the United States Government)Thanks. I was looking around the Mozilla site yesterday for info on this but didn't see anything. That kicks major boo-tay.
90
posted on
06/26/2004 2:22:58 AM PDT
by
Musket
To: ShadowAce
91
posted on
06/26/2004 3:53:29 AM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: Bush2000
Gee that's a lot of bugs. I've been using Firefox for a day and a half on XP with zero problems. And I've had Mozilla on my Linux box forever with zero problems. Are you trying to scare people? I think you're too late. There has been a mass exodus from IE in the past 36 hours.
92
posted on
06/26/2004 4:01:46 AM PDT
by
Musket
To: Musket
So far it runs faster than IE. It doesn't take as much system resources...
93
posted on
06/26/2004 5:22:56 AM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: mlo
Boy, you're a rude jerk, who needs to understand the technology a little better before spouting off and insulting people you don't know.
Sounding like you know what you're talking about when you don't is insulting, dude.
94
posted on
06/26/2004 5:56:44 AM PDT
by
dyed_in_the_wool
(Why do Al Qaeda and DNC press releases always sound the same?)
To: ScuzzyTerminator
Thank you!! I'm (obviously) not much of a techie, sorry about using the wrong term.
95
posted on
06/26/2004 7:57:20 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: Dont Mention the War
Done. Welcome to the trenches. It can get pretty rough here, but as long as you don't tie your self-esteem your your tech you should be OK. :)
96
posted on
06/26/2004 8:41:33 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Bush2000
Now, THAT'S an interesting bit of FUD. I recommend Firefox and you post a bug list to Mozilla, claiming the browser has that many bugs.
Different product, dude. Read for comprehension.
97
posted on
06/26/2004 8:44:35 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Flyer
My normal way to browse FR is to use the Slave option. What I usually do is open up FR's News/Activism page to read the headlines. When I see an article I want to read, I'll right-click it to open into a new tab.
Firefox can be set to open all links into new tabs, but it may require the TabBrowser extension. I'm not really sure to be honest, because that is one of the first extensions I load up when I change from one version to another. Since I always have it running, I'm not sure if that funcationality is on the base browser ar part of the extension.
98
posted on
06/26/2004 8:50:25 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
After reading this thread, I installed firefox on my desktop PC which I had for the most part stopped using on the internet. I primarily use my ibook for the internet because its wireless and I like Safari. I have set up the browser with Java and put in some of my favorite bookmarks. It is like a new computer, no pop-ups and no you have performed an illegal operation boxes. I tried to remove IE 6, but I could not get the job done. Can you remove IE 6 if you have Windows 98 SE?
To: Biblebelter
Can you remove IE 6 if you have Windows 98 SE? I don't think so. I'm pretty sure that MS has made that darn nigh impossible. Just remove the icon(s) for it, and never use it. You should be fine doing that.
100
posted on
06/26/2004 9:27:36 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson