VANITY: The "Truth" about JimRob and Free Republic according to BADJOE

LibertyPost.org | 10/10/03 | BADJOE (Slightly revised by JimRob)

[Dales]

The bad news now is, I fear, that some things are back to being inexplicable ;-)

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you so much for your support! I pinged Piltdown_Woman and OWK because they had witnessed much of what I discussed and would be able to make any necessary clarifications.

[tpaine]

Yep.. -- I checked thru my freepmails & found I had made the same mistake 15 months ago..

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you so much for your post!

There are some exceptional scientists who post there and I have truly learned an amazing amount from them.

You are of course among the exceptional scientists on this forum. I have learned so much from all of you. You've been patient, explained things that are probably painfully obvious to you and have given me leads to do my own research now and again.

Thank you and thanks to all the Free Republic scientists!!!

[gore3000]

You continue to be unable to show that anything I have said was a lie-me-

Actually, in all of my posts to you, I don't ever remember calling you a liar.

Then why are you attacking me for telling the truth? Why are you trying to help the people who are lying? Seems to me that a moral person would be backing the person who is telling the truth not the ones who are spouting slanderous accusations about people like the evos have been saying about stalking when they are the stalkers not their opponents.

[Alamo-Girl]

Clearly, you are not a hijacker Piltdown_Woman! But I am honored to call you my sister in the Lord.

[VadeRetro]

Your ping list is not the problem, which is all I wanted to show. I should be more like you and rise to fewer baits, A-G. It's hard to hold back when you realize all you have to do is point to what is right there in what people have already read.

[gore3000]

It does not help the Cause to keep these festering petty animosities.

It is not us that keep it up. It is the evos that force us to defend ourselves. They have gotten four good Christians banned from FR - medved, ALS, JesseShurun and goodseedhomeschool (twice). They are trying to silence all opposition. If you are for free speech and for a FreeRepublic, you should direct your post to them.

[tpaine]

tpaine
The bad news now is, I fear, that some things are back to being inexplicable ;-)
2,261 -Dales-


Ours not to wonder why, but to do or get inexplicably axed? ;-)

Gotta love it.. ;-p

[RadioAstronomer]

Then why are you attacking me for telling the truth? Why are you trying to help the people who are lying? Seems to me that a moral person would be backing the person who is telling the truth not the ones who are spouting slanderous accusations about people like the evos have been saying about stalking when they are the stalkers not their opponents.

I am not attacking you personally at all. It is the constant calling people liars. You called me one twice on this thread alone. That is what I was trying to get across.

[Sandy]

H.Akston's main schtick seems to be ranting against the 14th. I just knew he had to be the one you were thinking of.

[RadioAstronomer]

You are of course among the exceptional scientists on this forum.

Awwww... You honor me!

Thank you! :-)

[VadeRetro]

You are nothing if not courageous, arguing with a poster who has never been refuted, ever, on anything. Out for the night.

[Sandy]

courtesy ping (since your name came up)

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you so much for your reply and the excellent verses! And thank you so much for your observations, Piltdown_Woman! I'm confident we are all very close in our understanding of the Great Commandment.

Indeed, Christ answered the question fully. My point was that He answered more than the attorney asked (as He did with the tax and resurrection questions in the same Chapter.) The part I was focusing on is emphasized below:

Master, which [is] the great commandment in the law?

Jesus answer showed that the law itself hangs on the Great Commandment:

On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

[hchutch]

Sounds like an idea - we need a title, though.

[gore3000]

Then why are you attacking me for telling the truth? Why are you trying to help the people who are lying? Seems to me that a moral person would be backing the person who is telling the truth not the ones who are spouting slanderous accusations about people like the evos have been saying about stalking when they are the stalkers not their opponents.-me-

I am not attacking you personally at all.

Gee, sure sounded like it! Again, why are you attacking me instead of defending me when you know that my statement about the stalking by the evos was perfectly true? Explain that one. Why are you attacking my character when it is the character of people who are slandering others that needs to be attacked? Explain that one.

[CobaltBlue]

it should be noted that the evolutionists never refute anything I say

Crew: What, never?

Captain: No, never.

Crew: What, NEVER?

Captain: Hardly ever.

(Apologies to Gilbert and Sullivan, HMS Pinafore.)

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you so much for the explanation! Indeed, I find it hard to resist correcting a misunderstanding - especially one which is seemingly obvious.

[RadioAstronomer]

Please go back and re-read my entire post. I was referring the the liar and slimer accusations.

Posts like that do not forward your point of view. In fact they detract from it.