Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Genetic Changes In Mice 'Question Evolution Speed'
Ananova ^ | 5-21-2003

Posted on 05/21/2003 4:53:28 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 2,061-2,065 next last
To: ALS
Now that I have access to a text-only browser I can see that your picture wasn't really a statement of challenge so much as a statement of your anticipation. OF course, your original challenge is meaningless, because no professional scientist claims that the theory of evolution explains the ultimate orign of life. Only lying creationists assert en masse that evolution has anything to do with the ultimate origins of life.
181 posted on 05/23/2003 3:07:18 PM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Are you contending that the modern coelacanth should be classified as the same species as one of the fossil forms?

The question is of relevant change. The fact of change of some sort is not being argued. The definition of species is peripheral to question of changing a reptile into a dog. The title of this thread involves speed of change. That is what is in question here not the fact of change.

182 posted on 05/23/2003 3:17:20 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
So your source (implicitly) argues that the rate of change in putatively neutral molecular characters (selected regions of the DNA) is roughly constant -- this being how the time of divergence between the two existing populations of coelacanth was determined -- whereas morphological evoltution is not necessarily constant in rate, and can even halt for long periods.

I agree and see no problem with this.

183 posted on 05/23/2003 3:28:13 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
Prehistoric and modern coelacanths are not even in the same genus, much less species.

Camels and llamas separated some 40 million years ago. They are not of the same genus.


184 posted on 05/23/2003 3:31:20 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Modern and ancient coelacanths are in the same order, not the same genus. Llamas and camels are in the same order, not the same genus. Humans and chimps are in the same order, not the same genus (though some argue that chimps should be put into genus homo, that is still a minority position). Humans and gorillas are in the same order, not the same genus.

Your point was?

185 posted on 05/23/2003 3:35:04 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
Your point was?

The picture is a llama/camel baby.

186 posted on 05/23/2003 3:38:46 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Didn't know that. Interesting.
187 posted on 05/23/2003 3:41:32 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
The picture is a llama/camel baby.

So?

188 posted on 05/23/2003 3:47:44 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
I agree and see no problem with this.

Another point in the reference was that morphological differences observed by the first team between the two species were not observed to be there when compared to the variation in one of the species.(my wording may be bad)

189 posted on 05/23/2003 3:49:30 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
So?

What is the definition of a species/genus?

190 posted on 05/23/2003 3:51:09 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
What is the definition of a species/genus?

Can you put that question in the form of having a point?

191 posted on 05/23/2003 3:55:32 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
morphological differences observed by the first team between the two species were not observed to be there when compared to the variation in one of the species

No, your wording was fine. That made sense. There's always the risk (in any circumstance) of a small sample not being representative.

192 posted on 05/23/2003 3:58:08 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Can you put that question in the form of having a point?

Definitions are a Darwinian's best friend.

193 posted on 05/23/2003 4:02:11 PM PDT by AndrewC (Just kidding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
What is the definition of a species/genus?

A group of organisms whose members can interbreed and produce fertile offspring.

Are llama-camel hybrids fertile?

194 posted on 05/23/2003 4:05:26 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Definitions are a Darwinian's best friend.

Uh, nope, sorry. Still not discerning a point.

195 posted on 05/23/2003 4:07:20 PM PDT by Stultis (Are you and f.Christian switching medications again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
A group of organisms whose members can interbreed

Careful. Natural populations... and interbreeding means doing so (or potentially doing so) in nature. For example humans have to intervene to "trick" horses and asses into mating (usually via a "bait and switch" method) and thereby hybridizing.

196 posted on 05/23/2003 4:12:10 PM PDT by Stultis (Are you and f.Christian switching medications again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
A group of organisms whose members can interbreed

Careful. Natural populations... and interbreeding means doing so (or potentially doing so) in nature. For example humans have to intervene to "trick" horses and asses into mating (usually via a "bait and switch" method) and thereby hybridizing.

197 posted on 05/23/2003 4:12:16 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Good point. Camels and llamas can similarly be bred only by artificial insemination.
198 posted on 05/23/2003 4:17:04 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Stultis; Lurking Libertarian
(or potentially doing so) in nature.

Are you betting on the word potentially?

199 posted on 05/23/2003 5:14:28 PM PDT by AndrewC (Just kidding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: blam
Anyone with a brain can see mice are evolving like crazy . . . For instance, who had a wheel on their mouse 20 years ago?
200 posted on 05/23/2003 5:30:47 PM PDT by LibWhacker (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 2,061-2,065 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson