"Even more posts on homosexuality...i'm curious as to why?"

Catholic Family Association of America/ Free Republic ^ | 5/1/03 | Dr. Brian Kopp, Vice President, Catholic Family Association of America

[MrLeRoy]

Did you ever provide evidence for this claim of yours: "the call for lowering the age of consent for homosexual sex across the board by the homo movement"?

[MrLeRoy]

I have subsequently posted multiple excerpts from mainstream homo publications/advocates proving beyond a reasonable doubt that chickeninghawking is accepted by and practiced by a very large proportion of homosexual males

Looks that way.

[Polycarp]

"the call for lowering the age of consent for homosexual sex across the board by the homo movement"?

YES

But you must have missed the same link in this post of mine to you.

[Polycarp]

Looks that way.

Thank you.

[MrLeRoy]

Did you ever provide evidence for this claim of yours: "the call for lowering the age of consent for homosexual sex across the board by the homo movement"?

YES

The fact that 14,800 Web sites have the words "age", "consent", "homosexual", and "acts" on them does not prove that the homo movement across the board calls for lowering the age of consent for homosexual sex. Care to try again?

[MrLeRoy]

The Constitution does not confer a fundamental right upon homosexuals to engage in sodomy.

Quite correct.

[Darksheare]

I'm getting the distinct impression that you won't state what you believe.
I'm also getting the distinct impression that even when shown proof to your very eyes, you will deny it vehemently.

And yet, you still insist that you didn't say that chickenhawking doesn't happen..
Tsk tsk.
"The fact that 14,800 Web sites have the words "age", "consent", "homosexual", and "acts" on them does not prove that the homo movement across the board calls for lowering the age of consent for homosexual sex."
That can also be taken to mean that "it doesn't happen".
Care to clarify your position?
Ever?

[Polycarp]

Propagandist.

Anyone reading the links in that Google search can only conclude that homos are making a concerted and cohesive effort to lower age of consent laws across the board.

No one here is being converted by your spin. The readers can see through your BS.

[MrLeRoy]

Propagandist.

Anyone reading the links in that Google search can only conclude

Like you've read 14,800 sites?

Clown.

[MrLeRoy]

That can also be taken to mean that "it doesn't happen".

Wrong again. Run along and play.

[Darksheare]

No, not wrong.
Why don't you actually state what you believe?
Because the conclusions I am drawing are coming directly from what you are saying.
And directly from what you've been defending.

You must, by needs, clarify.

[MrLeRoy]

Why don't you actually state what you believe?

I think chickenhawking happens, and that some homosexuals have called for lowering the age of consent. Clear enough for you yet?

[Egregious Philbin]

Propagandist.

Takes one to know one, I guess.

[Polycarp]

No one here is being converted by your spin. The readers can see through your BS.

BTW, DU trolls are always properly dealt with here.

Why are the mods allowing so many liberal homosexual propagandists to spin their trade here lately?

[Polycarp]

You obviously don't comprehend the difference between absolute Truths and propaganda.

But thanks for playing, regardless.

[Darksheare]

OKay.
Would have been better off saying that a long ways back, but that'll do.

[Polycarp]

Amen.

[longtermmemmory]

its not really the altering living document that the pc would have us believe. The constitution was designed to bring consistency to society. Certain things were inherently unchanging. (life, liberty etc...). The Consititution was never intended as an a-moral doucument. Nor was the constitution intended as a substitute for morality.

[Darksheare]

Almost as bad as trying to get answers out of old Asmodeus befor he got himself banned.
Egads.