Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Even more posts on homosexuality...i'm curious as to why?"
Catholic Family Association of America/ Free Republic ^ | 5/1/03 | Dr. Brian Kopp, Vice President, Catholic Family Association of America

Posted on 05/01/2003 2:41:23 PM PDT by Polycarp

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 581-599 next last
To: JoshGray
Oh Josh, still trying to justfy your perversion I see.
161 posted on 05/01/2003 9:05:56 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
You forgot to post your source from your prison stat. I so look forward to it. If you lied, please confess and stop wasting my time.

The issue is that rape can change or cause the person to choose the sexual preference of the rapist. I never said it would cure pathology, even though you are in error that homosexuality is a pathology, but I'm sure you have a source for that also. The issue is not curing pathology it is affecting the choice of sexuality.

162 posted on 05/01/2003 9:07:49 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: breakem
I don't see why you want to present the notion that committing a criminal sexual act upon an already deviant personality will somehow change the deviant persona. I suppose I'll step back up on the porch and watch while the debate goes on. Way over my head.
163 posted on 05/01/2003 9:08:37 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
I am applying the logic of the poster, I am not giving my opinion. Am asking why doesn't the trauma work both ways.
164 posted on 05/01/2003 9:10:14 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: breakem
It is yet another example of the anecdotal "evidence" used too often here to excoriate homosexuals.

And thanks to the Santorum controversy which leaves open the possibility conservatives really do want to lock homosexuals up.....this nonsense is absolutely going to hurt the Republican party.
Who would want the sort of homophobic nuts we see in some of these threads in charge of anything?

165 posted on 05/01/2003 9:11:33 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
It's unhealthy to emotionally hyperventilate in the way you're doing. But keep it up; maybe you'll pass out from your pro-sodomy passion.
166 posted on 05/01/2003 9:13:32 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: breakem
even though you are in error that homosexuality is a pathology, but I'm sure you have a source for that also.

That would be the DSMII

The issue is not curing pathology it is affecting the choice of sexuality.

You mean like in prison? Are you saying that “all” “sex” in prison is not consensual?

167 posted on 05/01/2003 9:14:22 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: breakem
Pro-sodomy all day, everyday.

It's a shame you can't get a life.

168 posted on 05/01/2003 9:14:44 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
And thanks to the Santorum controversy which leaves open the possibility conservatives really do want to lock homosexuals up.....

If you're saying that Santorum wants to lock up homosexuals, it's false. You should either clarify or retract.

169 posted on 05/01/2003 9:15:11 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Oh, Clint, still relying on half-remembered propaganda I see.
170 posted on 05/01/2003 9:15:27 PM PDT by JoshGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: breakem
You forgot to post your source from your prison stat.

I said I’d look them up tomorrow.

171 posted on 05/01/2003 9:16:36 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
If you're saying that Santorum wants to lock up homosexuals, it's false.

Jorge is in a swoon; in his vile fanstasy he imagines Santorum stringing up men-who-lust-after-men by their genitals and dipping them in acid.

Jorge knows that what is being proposed; breakem told him so.

172 posted on 05/01/2003 9:19:01 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: JoshGray
Sorry, I don’t book mark every thing I’ve read for the past 5 years for sake of justifying your perversion. Unlike you and madg who are here to promote the homosexual agenda.
173 posted on 05/01/2003 9:20:27 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
That answer won't please JoshGray; he's going to prance away in a snit.
174 posted on 05/01/2003 9:22:11 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
It's unhealthy to emotionally hyperventilate in the way you're doing. But keep it up; maybe you'll pass out from your pro-sodomy passion.

Where have you seen anything I've posted that is "pro-sodomy"?

I challenge you to find it and post it here for all to see.

The fact is you can't.

You're a liar.

All you are good at is these cowardly hit and run one-liners..and you never stick around to respond to the challenges.

I don't blame you. I wouldn't want to be stuck with defending your infantile screeds either.

175 posted on 05/01/2003 9:24:25 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
A simple websearch disproves most every point you've ever tried to make, so why waste time bookmarking it?

The only think I "promote" is truth and accuracy, two things sorely lacking in the propaganda of the professional (and amatuer) 'phobes.

176 posted on 05/01/2003 9:24:45 PM PDT by JoshGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
No.
177 posted on 05/01/2003 9:25:51 PM PDT by JoshGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
"And thanks to the Santorum controversy which leaves open the possibility conservatives really do want to lock homosexuals up....."

If you're saying that Santorum wants to lock up homosexuals, it's false. You should either clarify or retract.

Go back and read what I posted again....it's not that hard to understand.

178 posted on 05/01/2003 9:27:10 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
I kinda figured the recent invasion of FR by the sodomites was an organized effort. Thanks.
179 posted on 05/01/2003 9:28:09 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
If I book marked everything I’ve had to read for my position my list would be rather, let’s say, horrifying for anyone to read NOT understand its intent. Subject matter like incest, prison sex, bestiality…YUK!
180 posted on 05/01/2003 9:28:59 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 581-599 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson