Skip to comments.
Dad who pluggedprowler spurns deal
New York Daily News ^
| 4/08/03
| NANCIE L. KATZ
Posted on 04/08/2003 5:57:45 AM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420, 421-440, 441-460 ... 1,141-1,149 next last
To: demosthenes the elder
Plug the hole with body parts of the perp you shoot.
421
posted on
04/08/2003 1:15:12 PM PDT
by
ninenot
To: demosthenes the elder
compared to 1-10, the 14th is recent, yes.
-dte-
Lessee.. - An amendment passed 77 years after the first 10; -
-- is considered 'recent' 135 years later.
Now thats quibbling.
422
posted on
04/08/2003 1:15:35 PM PDT
by
tpaine
To: stuartcr
You just don't get it do you.
Too bad.
423
posted on
04/08/2003 1:16:29 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: tpaine
Our constitution is not 'difficult' at all, if you agree with its basic principle, - maximum individual freedom.
I do.
You are operating on a false premise, that "we will all invariably arrive at different conclusions"... -- Why would we, given that we all want individual freedom, living in a free constitutional republic?
We will, even though we may all (most of us, anyway) want maximum individual freedom. People will differ as to where that line is drawn when, once crossed, they feel that their freedom has been encroached on by another's. There is no Utopia.
To: demosthenes the elder
Of course there are acceptable losses, and I would hope that anyone on a plane with terrorists NOT armed with guns, would do something...not unlike those over PA. As I said, if there are no guns, which the 9/11 group did not have, no one would get shot, either intentionally, or by mistake.
To: stuartcr
As I stated, I doubt any airline that wanted to turn a profit, would allow guns on-board...too hard to tell the good from the bad.
Now, that may be true, but it should be up to the airlines to make that call. This is not something that should be imposed on them by the federal government. I should clarify, I am only discussing domestic flights in this context.
To: stuartcr
and if there WERE guns, in the hands of US citizens, there would be some terrorists with aftermarket airconditioning in their heads - whether or not the terrorists also had guns.
Note: US CITIZENS.
As in: must have US papers to be permitted to carry guns on to a plane. Papers of certification and marksmanship from an FAA-mandated training program would not be a bad idea either... say: one run by the NRA/military.
Makes it a little difficult for Saudi religious fanatics to meet the criteria, don't it?
To: demosthenes the elder; Dead Corpse
Take it up with your congressman. If you can't handle the way life and the world is, sorry. Learn to adapt.
To: demosthenes the elder
Not if they had the same passports, driver's licenses, flight licenses, etc. that the terrorists had. Not hard to obtain any paperwork with enough money.
To: SgtofMarines
Whatever...
-- And you're quibbling as to a 'Utopia', no one here said there is one.
430
posted on
04/08/2003 1:25:11 PM PDT
by
tpaine
To: stuartcr
I have so done and continue so to do. The bit about the congressmen, that is.
So, let me see if I understand you clearly: Your philosophy and model of civil ethics and duty is to bend over for wrongs if they are too big to fight without inconvenience?
To: stuartcr
well, it is true that the damned INS needs to start doing its damned job.
To: tpaine
Whatever?
That's not exactly the well-reasoned, detailed response I was expecting from you. I'm disappointed. (Seriously)
To: stuartcr
on the other hand, if the list of plane-certified passengers was kept by the NRA (as opposed to a government agency) and could be accessed AT THE BOARDING RAMP to compare passenger ID and face to the database, the terrorists'd be S.O.L.
To: stuartcr
If you can't handle the way life and the world is, sorry. Learn to adapt. Be a good little slave and learn to love the squirrel cage?
Not to damn likely there.
435
posted on
04/08/2003 1:30:40 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: SgtofMarines
Tell that to AllSmiles... :)
Posting to FreeRepublic is a privilege, not a right. If you don't understand the difference you may soon. You probably misinterpreted that sentence.
436
posted on
04/08/2003 1:31:04 PM PDT
by
Zon
To: Zon
Take it easy, big guy. I was just cracking a joke.
To: Critter
keep me posted. I live in Rochester and have never gone to NYC for this very reason, but I might make an exception if we are going to get some much needed press over this. The time for talk is over. The time to start pulling the wool from the public's eyes is now.
I will travel the 5 hours from Rochester to NYC to protest outside of the DA's house if someone can put me up for the night.
feel free to FRmail me. Thank you.
438
posted on
04/08/2003 1:35:58 PM PDT
by
bc2
To: southern rock
"The individual states have the right to pass ANY laws they want" Wrong again.
439
posted on
04/08/2003 1:41:10 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: SgtofMarines
The law prohibiting firearms on airplanes is perhaps not stupid, but it is unconstitutional. I'd be interested in hearing the Constitutional analysis behind that assertion.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420, 421-440, 441-460 ... 1,141-1,149 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson