Skip to comments.
"Jacko" Is One Sick Puppy!
Posted on 02/07/2003 2:24:18 PM PST by Valkster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-166 next last
To: Sungirl
My dad does business with the father of the original 13 year old boy who owns the "Rentawreck" business. They are independently wealthy themselves, multi-millionares on their own efforts. It was not money they were after.
Also, as a survivor of many years of childhood sexual abuse myself, I can say catagorically that as I read the report off "thesmokinggun" yesterday AFTER watching the entire broadcast, I am convinced that every word is true. It is believable in the way a child would speak, the way a child would explain the details. It is consistent with Michael's very own words and attitudes towards his obsession with children. Michael's "love" for children is completely egocentric, stemming from a damaged life & mind, without regard or understanding for the separateness of his children as individuals. They exist only to vindicate his pain, and only for his pleasure. THAT is the true definition of a classic pedophile. Of COURSE he has repeatedly molested children throughout his entire life. He knows no other way to relate to them. He is lost in himself. There is no child on earth that is safe in his presence.
To: Jael
Yeah...but did he see him that way sexually? Or peak in the shower? Or in the pool? Or changing for the pool? Don't you guys all get naked in the gyms showeroom I just need to hear more damaging evidence...it's only that one family right? Why would other families continue to let their kids go there? Why would Liz Taylor stick up for him? I am just on the fence about it....
22
posted on
02/08/2003 7:05:33 PM PST
by
Sungirl
(>^..^<)
To: Office Manager
It was not money they were after.Then why did they settle for money? Why didn't they want to get him and protect other kids?
23
posted on
02/08/2003 7:06:48 PM PST
by
Sungirl
(>^..^<)
To: Sungirl
The little boy he molested isn't responsible to stop him from raping and molesting other children. But their own parents are.
24
posted on
02/08/2003 7:07:23 PM PST
by
Jael
To: Sungirl
It's also amazing that an innocent man would pay 25 million to shut the child up that he raped.
No, innocent people don't pay 25 million dollars.
25
posted on
02/08/2003 7:08:41 PM PST
by
Jael
To: Jael
No, innocent people don't pay 25 million dollarsWealthy innocent people do.
Why didn't these parents who didn't need the money...settle for money and Michael Jackson free to molest other kids? Are they that selfish? Would you do that? Wouldn't you want to stop him from (supposingly) hurting any other children?
26
posted on
02/08/2003 7:13:14 PM PST
by
Sungirl
(>^..^<)
To: Sungirl
Excuse me? Why would any grown man allow a child to see his penis? Are you kidding me? You think that is normal?
27
posted on
02/08/2003 7:13:26 PM PST
by
Jael
To: Jael
He destroyed himself.
So did Elvis and Marylyn Monroe. But the fact remains that there is a concentrated effort on the medias part to destroy MJ after the lawsuit he had against one of the hollyweird moguls.
To: Jael
How do you know it was 'allowed'? Is there a chance it could of been an accident? Ever walk in on someone accidentally? DO we know for sure?
29
posted on
02/08/2003 7:16:08 PM PST
by
Sungirl
(>^..^<)
To: Sungirl
Look at it like this. The little boy was damaged, probably for life, by being raped by Jackson. Why shouldn't he be compensated? Why would anyone object to the child being compensated by the person who raped him?
And by filing suit, every child who has a right thing parent is protected.
Any parent from this point out (after the case was filed and settled) is obvioulsy pimping their child for Wacko Jacko. They deserve the same punishment Jackson will get one day, at the hand of God.
30
posted on
02/08/2003 7:16:27 PM PST
by
Jael
To: Sungirl
Again, the child who was the victim deserved the compensation. Jackson paid it. Not because he was innocent. Innocent people don't pay off.
31
posted on
02/08/2003 7:17:48 PM PST
by
Jael
To: Sungirl
Have you ever been a victim of child sexual abuse,and had to give a deposition about the details? Ever had to sit down and talk to adults about your body from head to toe, remembering how and where things happened in humiliating moments between you and someone you trusted? Well, I have, twice, and I was an adult. Both times sent me into depression, once resulting in a psych hospitalization. Mine happened unsolicited by me, as others went to the authorities and I was subpoened to make statements.
I can guarantee you that Michael or Michael's "people" no doubt made specific threats to that boy and his family as to how they intended to wipe out their credibility, destroy them professionally, and hunt them down if they pursued the charges. Testifying against any molester doesn't automatically bring emotional healing to any victim. Nor is it the responsibility of victims OR parents to heal the world, or protect every child from every monster. They were extremely brave in coming forward initially to the Santa Barbara DA, who is corrupt as the day is long, by the way. THAT act brought the truth out, so other victims would have the courage to come forward. The money? It was the only way they could know they would ever be safe from Michael's influence. My guess is it was dumped in investment accounts somewhere in the children's names for their futures.
Let's all be careful in judging motives before we know all the details (which we never will) or have walked in someone else's shoes.
To: Jael
The little boy was damaged, probably for life, by being raped by Jackson.Well...now you are talking like it's absolute. For all we know...the damage to this kid was done by his parents....coaching him to say things that never happend for money. I see/hear no proof. I only see selfish uncaring parents who are willing to let other kids (supposingly) get molested (if true).
33
posted on
02/08/2003 7:20:26 PM PST
by
Sungirl
(>^..^<)
To: Sungirl
Consider that your cat would not have to testify in open court in front of his abuser.
It would be rationalizing, but understandable, for the dad to say, better to make Jackson pay this way and make sure my kid is going to have a secure future, than to make him go through a court proceeding that will tear him to pieces and doesn't guarantee any kind of compensation. Plus, I've put the world on notice what Jackson did to my kid. They can consider themselves warned. And if the monster does it again, or has done it in the past, others can come forward and they will be believed.
Kids with families and a crummy parent or parents are the ones most vulnerable to this kind of abuse, by the way. They make easy targets because they need the love and comforts offered...
The dad in this case took his son away from his horrible wife, and out of Jackson's clutches.
34
posted on
02/08/2003 7:20:43 PM PST
by
SarahW
To: John Lenin
Nope, that won't fly. Jackson himself was failing. His music was old, so was his act. No one needed to bring him down, he brought himself down.
His problem was that while he doesn't think he gets old, the world does. No one wants his music anymore. It's aged, it's boring, it's the retread music of an over the hill non player on the music scene.
His lawsuit wasn't filed until longer after he raped that kid and long after his album bombed.
Motolla isn't a racist. But even if he was, it wouldn't matter. Jackson stopped being black a long time ago. The fact the he wanted to use black people as a pawn in his game speaks to the heart of what's wrong with Jackson.
35
posted on
02/08/2003 7:21:17 PM PST
by
Jael
To: Jael
Again, the child who was the victim deserved the compensation. Jackson paid it. Not because he was innocent. Innocent people don't pay off.Again...wealthy innocent people do pay off.
36
posted on
02/08/2003 7:21:35 PM PST
by
Sungirl
(>^..^<)
To: Sungirl
You can walk in on people accidently all day long and never know about a birthmark that is under the penis.
37
posted on
02/08/2003 7:22:15 PM PST
by
Jael
To: Sungirl
Of course it is absolute. Mikey's signing the check tells us that. Not to mention is admitting he likes to sleep with little boys.
38
posted on
02/08/2003 7:24:04 PM PST
by
Jael
To: Sungirl
Why didn't these parents who didn't need the money...settle for money and Michael Jackson free to molest other kids? Are they that selfish? With all his money,maybe Mikey has thugs working for him that are in the art of breaking limbs if certain people have a tendacey to squeal.You know,take the hush money or we'll start with breaking your arms,ala Clinton.I'm just wondering.Nobody's mentioned this possibility.
To: SarahW
I couldn't have said it better myself. Amen.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-166 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson