Skip to comments.
A chat room helped Westerfield prosecutors
San Diego Union Tribune ^
| 12/12/02
| Alex Roth
Posted on 12/12/2002 8:19:20 AM PST by Jaded
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 541-559 next last
To: basscleff
is redsh!tstick giving you lip service?
Comment #22 Removed by Moderator
To: redlipstick
So WHAT PART OF TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS constitutes a fan site? You just can't stand it that people don't fall in line like nice little sheeple.
Besides the picture was 2 of your favorite people.
23
posted on
12/12/2002 1:15:07 PM PST
by
Jaded
To: BARLF
The bugs don't lie but the jurors believe they do. Yeah....... They didn't believe the search dogs either. I read the dogs traced Danielle to the empty house next door that was being painted (blue, maybe?) by it's new owners. I wonder how much time, if any, prosecution spent checking that angle.
To: Jaded
This is from a transcript:
(THE FOLLOWING OCCURRED OUT OF THE PRESENCE OF THE JURY: PROCEEDINGS NOT PART OF THE PUBLIC RECORD. (END OF PROCEEDINGS OUT OF THE PRESENCE OF THE JURY.) THE COURT: GOOD MORNING, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, AND WELCOME BACK. I HAD HOPED WHEN WE NEXT MET THAT THE PADRES WOULD BE ON A LENGTHY WINNING STREAK. UNFORTUNATELY THAT WAS NOT TO BE. AS YOU ALL KNOW, HAVING GONE THROUGH THE ORIENTATION PROGRAM THAT WAS PUT ON BY THE JURY COMMISSIONER, TRIALS IN THIS STATE ARE CONDUCTED IN VARIOUS PHASES OR STAGES. YOU FOLKS HAVE ALREADY BEEN THROUGH THE JURY-SELECTION PROCESS AND ARE NOW THE TWELVE JURORS AND SIX ALTERNATES THAT HAVE BEEN SELECTED TO HEAR THIS MATTER. THE NEXT PHASE OF THE TRIAL IS ANOTHER ORIENTATION. THIS ORIENTATION, HOWEVER, IS A LITTLE MORE SPECIFIC, BECAUSE IT NOW DEALS WITH SOME OF THE DOS AND DON'TS OF THIS NEW JOB THAT YOU HAVE. LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE IN THIS STATE, THIS..."
This is from a fansite:
"In closing, if any of David's friends or family have the chance to see this, I wish you strength and peace, this has to be a difficult time for all of you. Just know that there are more people than you think that support David and hope only for the best outcome for him. There are also people who admire your integrity and character for standing behind the man you know, in the face of the opposition."
I know the difference.
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: Jaded
And? Do the words "IMPOSSIBLE, IMPOSSIBLE FOR DAVID WESTERFIELD TO HAVE DUMPED" many any thing to you? What part of that says he did it?What part says he didn't *kill* her? Look again. It doesn't deny that Westerfield is in fact the killer.
To: redlipstick
MC/RL, why do you bother coming here? Stalking? It took close to 4 hours for y'all to show up. Hey, why don't you do your own site. It would give you something ELSE to do. SheeshRegarding the paragraph, should I wish mad cow disease on them, perhaps the plague? Would that make you happy? GET A GRIP!
I have to find a different color next time, perhaps a nice purple.
28
posted on
12/12/2002 1:55:47 PM PST
by
Jaded
To: Jaded
The Van Dams ORIGINALLY said it wasn't true. No, the van Dams originally said it wasn't true because they had never heard about it. Big diff.
To: cyncooper
whatever. thanks bye have a nice day.
30
posted on
12/12/2002 1:56:30 PM PST
by
Jaded
To: redlipstick
The van Dams originally said THEY DIDN'T KNOW - not that it wasn't true.Thanks red. I was replying as I read through the thread and hadn't read your post yet. I just said the same thing.
To: Jaded
So WHAT PART OF TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS constitutes a fan site?Now, now Jaded. Post a link to your site and let others see that there is much, much more than mere transcripts.
Note, I am not posting any critcism here, just noting that you are mischaracterizing your website.
To: I. Ben Hurt
I read the dogs traced Danielle to the empty house next door that was being painted Please post your documentation for this assertion.
However, in the search warrants the one dog was noted to have acted interested in part of Westerfield's garage. It was noted that it wasn't considered a strong enough reaction to be called a hit, but the dog was interested, and the judge made note of it when ruling on the warrant.
Also, the jurors must have believed the cadaver dog.
To: Jaded
why do you bother coming here?Because Free Republic is a place to discuss. Part of discussion is refutation of the absurd. Your position is absurd and not founded in fact.
I'll be here to counteract your disinformation campaign as long as you continue to post.
To: cyncooper; Jaded
I just checked the FR homepage - the forum still belongs to JR.
To: Jaded
He also criticized the media for overhyping the testimony about the van Dams' spouse-swapping and the couple's use of marijuana on the night their daughter vanished. overhyping? The poster family for s-s, ca, and mj are taking all the hype they can get. /sarcasm
To: cyncooper
Oh, spare me you trite b/s, your highness, knower of all things.
37
posted on
12/12/2002 2:30:23 PM PST
by
Jaded
Comment #38 Removed by Moderator
Comment #39 Removed by Moderator
To: cyncooper
Actually, in one of the interviews they said "you can't believe everything you see in the paper". That was one version. There are others.
40
posted on
12/12/2002 2:35:05 PM PST
by
Jaded
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 541-559 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson