Posted on 11/07/2017 1:15:39 PM PST by drewh
Happy now?
Facts not in evidence.
you aren't funny
Yes I am. I even crack myself up, and I'm a tough audience.
Who did I insult who wasn't here? If you mean your husband I never insulted him. I worried for him being married to a harpy like you. The poor man. I would never insult him. He's got enough problems.
And the insults, that you want me to "laugh at
No, sweety. I don't want YOU to laugh at them. I want the audience to laugh at them, and thereby, laugh at YOU. You can't seem to understand the simplest things. That's why you have no sense of humor. You are book smart, but not people smart.
Want to see a very ugly person, inside and out? GO LOOK INTO THE NEAREST MIRROR, OR SOME SHINY OBJECT.
No, angel face. When I look in the mirror I see a Greek God. And my mumsy says I'm special.
No, no replies. But then, I really didn't expect any.
And no, I am NOT "obsessed with sex", nor even all that interesting in your sexual habits. I just wanted to show you( the plural you ) that it takes two.
Bully for you.
Let's shoot for 1000.
Maybe that's true and it probably is. But to the casual reader of the thread, it looks like you used it directly after I did. My accusation was a subtle attack. It's one of the many ways I work to defeat your gung fu. And now I have you explaining yourself, so you look even more foolish. See how this game is played?
You never had a chance dear. You should never have came at me ugly.
Yes, after eating the apple, they both discovered, to their shame, that they were naked and THAT innocence was lost.
All religions have stories that are supposed to teach certain lessons to their observers.
It can mean any number of things, amongst them Christianity, Christianity being goodness, etc.!
A whore in the metaphorical sense. As a fallen woman. A woman without virtue. You chose to take it literally. Another failing of yours. You need to study your opponent. Figure out their language patterns. I often speak in different styles all mixed together. Maybe hard to decipher for one so strict and serious such as yourself.
Loosen up.
On the sexual questioning.
There are better ways to point out hypocrisy. I would change up from the detail oriented questions to a more general approach. It seriously does come off as creepy. For example, I would never ask you, or any woman that, even if I was really going after you (them).
The Pentagram isn't in any way a "Masonic symbol"!
It's been an extremely long time since I've watched this movie, but I don't remember ANY "Masonic" symbols at all. Care to point all of them out?
And are you certain that you know what IS a "Masonic symbol"?
Exactly my point. I have chosen to take that lesson from that story. No man, including you, has the perfect answer.
That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
You are a driven woman.
Horrifically, some insane doctors are now working on trying to figure out just HOW to transplant a uterus into trannies who imagine that they were "born in the wrong body".
Repetitive hogwash.
I'm always happy, diddums.
:)
I don’t need your links, which you need because you don’t know about such things, I know all about the Thune Society and other such in Germany at that time. Most people do, now, because of the Nazi connection.
You aren't very selective in your linking.
But no, it's true. When you try to lump me in with an "ilk" you make a huge mistake. There really is nobody else like me. I am unique, like a special snowflake. At least mumsy told me I was.
Assigning me to an ilk just proves that you are incapable of recognizing traits and difference in people. It means you are mentally lazy or incapable of differentiating.
Be better.
You and others here, have misused the word feminism and misused it in an historical content.
If you truly are all in for "first wave feminism" ( which is actually what the SUFFRAGISTS were about and they never called it feminism ), then good for you and that's exactly whom I was defending!
It's the Suffragettes on down, who were and still are the rotten apples in the barrel.
There were crossed wires here. Have I managed, at last to get my position through to you, as you finally did with me ?
You do know, I'm certain, the story about giving someone something to eat, for nothing, as opposed to giving him a job...right?
I think in terms of first, second, and third wave feminism. The second and especially the third waves did and are doing the real damage.
Unless you consider women voting as doing damage. Some do I'm sure.
Yes, the so called cultural revolution was comprised of many factions. including, as you call them, the red diaper babies. The ideology of second wave feminism that evolved during that time resulted in it's own particular policy and cultural changes. Third wave continues and magnifies the damage.
So I think, in essence, you are correct. But I think I am too. And if you can separate in your mind "women" from "feminism" you will not be so defensive when people attack feminism.
Is that a reasonable compromise?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.