Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NC HIGHWAY PATROL MAY HAVE A HUGE PROBLEM......
She's Right ^ | July 1, 2011 | Hoyt G. Tessener

Posted on 07/03/2011 12:24:50 PM PDT by Texas Fossil

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-408 next last
To: Forgotten Amendments

I believe this account completely —I was robbed on a street at night by uniformed SFPD patrolmen.

Sounds like fiction, right?


41 posted on 07/03/2011 1:45:27 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
If so, the husband is stupid for getting the governor involved.

He wasn't, so he was smart in getting the gov. involved.......I'd have done the same thing

42 posted on 07/03/2011 1:45:27 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: macquire

>>>Good lord people are naive here.

So are you.

>>>What SHAMELESS members here.

No one is forcing you to be here. Perhaps you’d be more at home elsewhere. Don’t let the door hit ya in the arse on your way out.


43 posted on 07/03/2011 1:45:46 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

That video shows nothing, nada. Officers are almost always placed on administrative leave when a charge as serious as this is leveled at them. You seem to forget this whole episode would never have happened if the accused had just TAKEN THE DWI test at the scene. Her refusal set the stage for this whole fiasco. As far as the “burned out headlight”...what don’t you get about malfunctioning equipment being the standard to allow police to stop ANY suspicious vehicle. It may not be right, but 100% of police use it to stop suspicious activity.


44 posted on 07/03/2011 1:49:05 PM PDT by macquire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

“uniformed SPPD”? Another tourista falls for the masquarade in SF by criminals.


45 posted on 07/03/2011 1:51:16 PM PDT by macquire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: macquire
even though it has already been discredited

I don't know where you are getting your information from but nothing has been discredited. IN FACT, the news station has reviewed the police evidence and everything the husband has stated has been substantiated.......

Thus the current investigation by internal affairs........

46 posted on 07/03/2011 1:53:57 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: macquire

You might be right, but the events which occurred at and after the police station don’t sound like an arresting officer having good judgment at the least.

If evidence reflects that these two officers conspired to have the husband pulled over, they should both be terminated.

This could lead to a civil suit and some sort of big dollar settlement.


47 posted on 07/03/2011 1:55:11 PM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: All

“More rotten cops” hitting all the left wing web sites thanks to a few here that have tried, convicted, and sentenced the officer to hard labor simply because the law tells him he has to arrest anyone who declines a breathalyzer test AND he resembles the corrupt warden’s lieutenant in “The Shawshank Redemption”.....

Shame on some of you here.


48 posted on 07/03/2011 1:58:14 PM PDT by macquire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: All

“More rotten cops” hitting all the left wing web sites thanks to a few here that have tried, convicted, and sentenced the officer to hard labor simply because the law tells him he has to arrest anyone who declines a breathalyzer test AND he resembles the corrupt warden’s lieutenant in “The Shawshank Redemption”.....

Shame on some of you here.


49 posted on 07/03/2011 1:58:14 PM PDT by macquire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

Or it could be about an officer thinking he was half an hour away from seeing his family ending up spending 4 hours messing with a self important Bit c h who refused a breathalyzer test and then tried to make a federal case out of it, to the point of lying....


50 posted on 07/03/2011 2:02:03 PM PDT by macquire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: deport

lol. your naivete is amusing.


51 posted on 07/03/2011 2:04:22 PM PDT by rokkitapps ( Hearings on healthcare waivers NOW! (If you agree make this your tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rokkitapps

lol. your naivete is amusing.


Glad to assist in making your Sunday afternoon a little more pleasurable. You take care now....


52 posted on 07/03/2011 2:07:04 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: macquire
what don’t you get about malfunctioning equipment being the standard to allow police to stop ANY suspicious vehicle

First of all, she blew .0000000 and that has been substantiated. Second of all, a ticket for a faulty headlight would have been issued if there was one in order for the officer to at least save some face here......The fact that he didn't issue a ticket was because there was no faulty headlight and that was merely an excuse he used to pull her over hoping for a DUI arrest or "something else".......

As far as the husband being pulled over while following officer Gomer, then released, that is in the police records also and I'm sure officer Smith is going to sing like a bird when internal affairs questions him.

As for your claim that the wife "should have blown into the breathalizer when pulled over", do I need to remind you that we are citizens of the United States and do not yet live under a Police State?

53 posted on 07/03/2011 2:08:35 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: macquire

Shameless? Look who’s talking. You’re shilling for rogue cops.


54 posted on 07/03/2011 2:08:40 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: macquire

The “rest of the story” is ‘he said she said’ as reported by ‘him’. Sorry I am not convinced, I say fire both officers.


55 posted on 07/03/2011 2:12:26 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: macquire
Basic facts of this letter appear to check out, investigation ongoing, officers on administrative leave which is standard procedure.

You are really, really personalizing this thing. If being a half hour from seeing his family was such a big deal, he could easily have escorted the woman to her destination, less than a mile away. Happens all the time with borderline, mild intoxication or other mechanical issues.

But, no, he appears to have engaged in at least a bit of vindictive behavior, directed at the woman's husband, at a minimum. And, for that, he's under investigation, as is his fellow officer. It was hearsay, tit for tat up to that point. That's where things went flying right out the window as far as any remote pretense of propriety.

56 posted on 07/03/2011 2:12:49 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: macquire

Are you Trooper Wyrick’s wife or brother or something?

She said she hadn’t been drinking. The cop said he smelled alcohol. She blew a 0.00 on a machine. TWICE!

You still trust the cop?

The cop can’t give you an accurate address, so he get hte man to follow. Then he speeds off with his wife, KNOWING THAT HEN IS FOLLOWING. I guess that seconds state trooper showing up to stop him was just a coincidence wasn’t it.

Where was the ticket for the headlight out?

I’m normally all behind cops, but this one stinks. If I’m that trooper, I better get a good lawyer.


57 posted on 07/03/2011 2:17:33 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: cyclotic

I was widowed at a young age with four young children. I felt it was important to raise my children properly and not get remarried. And I do not drink at all. Over the years I have been stopped by Highway Patrolman and propositioned, but the funniest incident happened a few years ago, when I, in my 80s was pulled over while driving alone one night after visiting my sister who had just had a stroke. This nice young patrolman was very polite and friendly, but once he had seen my driver’s license, he apologized and told me to be on my way. Guess we all look younger in the dark.


58 posted on 07/03/2011 2:18:52 PM PDT by MondoQueen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

“he could easily have escorted the woman to her destination, less than a mile away. Happens all the time with borderline, mild intoxication or other mechanical issues.”

What planet do you live on? When YOUR family is hit by this lady who may have been “mildly intoxicated” and or upset about being stopped, or whatever, and she loses control of her car when being “escorted”....I am SURE YOU and YOUR attorney suing everybody and everything would NEVER EVER call the officer negligent for letting her drive........

SHeese. Somebody put something in the water today. It is either that or somebody passed out stupid pills at the barbecue thinking they were candy.


59 posted on 07/03/2011 2:19:22 PM PDT by macquire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: MondoQueen

Most women would rather believe they were stopped because of their beauty rather than their ineptness behind the wheel.

Also, most women would rather believe the reason they got the ticket is because they took that 2 second stare down after the excuse making is over as a “proposition”.....

KEEERIST...


60 posted on 07/03/2011 2:22:58 PM PDT by macquire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-408 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson