Posted on 07/03/2011 12:24:50 PM PDT by Texas Fossil
I live near the Wallkill PD area of operation and am familiar with what happened here.
Reading the article just reminded me heavily of Wallkill PD.
Eliot Spitzer slapped them on the wrist, appointed a watchdog, and then walked away.
[He was the AG at the time.]
The locals started calling teh State Troopers on the Wallkill guys whenever they pulled someone over, but only after the Wallkill PD got slapped on the wrist.
Enough of that, and some token firings happened.
Certain officers finally figured it out, some transferred, others shaped up.
Then the guys who weren’t engaging in the behavior spoke up.
Once they weren’t going to be harassed themselves by the grimy cops.
I'm afraid what will happen is that Wyrich will just land a job in some other state/county/district, where he can start this up all over again. If a cop gets his badge yanked for behavior like this his ability to get a law enforcement job should be permanently over.
She’s guilty as homemade sin,,,
You are full of crap.
The facts of the story are substantiated, abusive and pretty scary.
First off, she was pulled over for a fabricated pretext, had a BAL of 0.00000 which confirms her story she was not drinking (if you have alcohol on your breath you will blow a positive reading), and had very reason to be concerned and frightened because of the police were falsely that she was drinking.
The real problem is what happened afterwords. She blew 0.0000, the officer tried to “recalibrate” the machine, would not let the husband witness the test, and she still blew 0.0000.
Despite the fact that she blew 0.0000 and had done nothing wrong, the officer forced her to a second location to see a magistrate for unexplained purposes. The husband was pulled over so he could not escort his wife despite his obvious concerns for the officers unusual and non standard behavior.
This is abuse by an LEO and scary stuff. Quite possibly, this happens often to people who do not have means to object, but the officer this time messed finally messed with the wrong people.
You write: She didn’t refuse the breath test (there is video of her blowing 0.00).
Uh buddy, that video was the test administered at the police station AFTER she was arrested for REFUSING THE BREATHALYZER TEST WHEN THE OFFICER STOPPED HER ON THE ROADWAY! You didn’t even read the letter the trial attorney wrote did you? You didn’t even read the police report did you? You didn’t even google the name of the trooper for an update did you? SHeese.
_________________________________________________________________
Hey moron - she did not refuse a sobriety test. She declined to take a FIELD sobriety test from a police officer, with his equipment, who was acting in a biased and aggressive fashion and requested to take the sobriety test in a more controlled environment which is both her right under the law and is perfectly understandable under the circumtances.
She did nothing wrong. The officer is in the wrong here- this was a bad stop from the get go and got progressively worse as the night went on.
I suspect there may be a few people coming forward with some very interesting stories about this officer’s behavior now that there is publicity
Lord Acton 1834–1902
“All women would rather believe they were stopped because of their beauty rather than their ineptness behind the wheel.
Also, all women would rather believe the reason they got the ticket is because they took that 2 second stare down after the standard excuse making is over as a “proposition”...”
There are plenty of intelligent women who disprove your fallacious statement.
Likewise, many women are smart enough to pick up on when a man finds them attractive and would like to roll in the sack with them.
You have needlessly and fallaciously smeared every woman on Free Republic, demonstrating intellectual dishonesty—the same trait shared by many posters at the Daily Kos or DU.
*cue crickets*
Thank you for posting the article. Hopefully the bad eggs will be removed.
“I reported 3 people. There is no call for the level of name calling these 3 were doing. NONE at all. They are children and need to be treated as children. Maybe with God’s help someday they will grow up.”
Very likely, you ensured that your name was brought to the attention of the moderators-—and not in a positive sense. People who abuse the abuse button don’t have a long shelf life here. Note that the posts you reported still remain, reflecting the moderator’s judgment that they did not violate the TOS.
Therefore, you have, on three counts, by your own admission, reported Freepers for non-TOS violations.
Posting on any online forum requires the poster to have (or develop) thick skin. Yours appears to be rather thin. This, coupled with your intellectual dishonesty, doesn’t speak well of you. Perhaps you ought to concern yourself with how God intends to make you a more mature individual, and now how He intends to deal with others.
“God help me, I would stand with obozo himself if his rights were in jeopardy. I might throw-up the whole time, but by God that is what we are supposed to do. “
John Adams would approve. :-)
No pretense by the Lady. It all started with a headlight which she didn’t even receive a warning for. Then it escalates into something that was so out of her control. It’s late at night, she admits she’s nervous, uncomfortable with the field test due to high heels on the gravel road and wants witnesses to the test. Once the first test was given and shows she’s completely sober, it should have been done.
Considering the fake law enforcement ready to victimize people late at night, this trooper didn’t take her concerns seriously and soon crossed the line.
He sounds like a cop who’s wife left him for a lawyer.
now = not
“Considering the fake law enforcement ready to victimize people late at night, this trooper didn’t take her concerns seriously and soon crossed the line.”
Exactly. A good police officer will understand that many women are apprehensive about being pulled over at night, and they will generally either permit the woman to go to a lit area or verify that the person pulling her over is, in fact, a cop, and not some criminal who bought a uniform and some lights.
That it does.
That’s quite true and based in it, YOU lost after your second post, sweetcheeks. Deal without. Right now the rest of us are just rubbing your nose in it, just as we would a puppy who hadn’t learned not to crap on the carpet.
Drop “without.” Insert “with it.” I have the dumbest spell checker in all of human history. So much for the “smart” phone.
And their vehicle was "suspicious" how????
You sound just like an arrogant NCHP officer!!
ROFLOL!!!
ROFLOL!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.