Posted on 10/04/2010 6:24:19 PM PDT by pissant
Well, I know of at least one cultist that doesn’t give a crap. I pointed out their spanish language ad blaming Obama for killing amnesty. The retard didn’t see anything that said amnesty in the ad. ROFL
Got that, Palin supporters? pissant is STIPULATING that he not only disagrees with Sarah Palin's views and your support of her...he's admitting that he attacks her supporters as cultists and mental midgets.
These are personal attacks on an entire constituency at FR...not differences of opinion. And when I see Palin's supporters being attacked in this way, I attack back.
pissant is doing the left's job for them, right here on Free Republic.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Since I don’t think they should even be able to vote, what makes you think I’d want one as CIC.
13 posted on Friday, July 23, 2010 2:20:02 PM by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
>And I attack them as mental midgets and cultists bitterly clinging to their Amnesty
If you’re talking about Univison, she was McPain’s VP when that happened. She couldn’t afford to openly oppose him. Also, more recently when she said she supports McPain’s policies on immigration, maybe Juan said that he changed his mind and now sees the light on border security. If so, all that means is that palin may be too trusting in this case.
>LOST
As TitansAFC said: “LOST is not as cut-and-dry as some people think. For one thing the U.S. Navy OVERWHELMINGLY supports it.
I have gone back-and-forth on LOST, trying to genuinely come to a strong position, but I find that either position causes some conflict. Proponents of LOST include Liberals who just see it as a way to tear into sovereignty, and the U.S. Navy who see it as a necessity. Opponents include some Communist regimes who fear it will give the U.S. free reign on international waters, and some Conservatives who think it needs further sovereignty protections before ratification.
I tend to lean toward opposing LOST, but all of my family and their peers in the Navy are for it. We’re talking about Paul-bots and rock-solid Conservatives here.
The point is, Conservatives have taken both positions on the treaty; and even some who oppose it only do so on some technical grounds. Governor Palin had objections also, as seen in her letter, out of fears of Alaska getting screwed. Reagan tried hard to get it “corrected” and passed on behalf of the Navy, but couldn’t get a consensus even in his own party.
It is a tougher issues than some want to admit. How do you continue to tell the Navy they can’t have something they claim is a necessity to do their jobs? On the other hand, how can a Conservative ever trust an international agreement these days?
This one’s not like Health Care “Reform” or bailouts. It’s not that easy”
>feminism
Maybe Palin thinks that she is a Susan B. Anthony type of feminist-the original feminists before the leftwing crazies hijacked it.
Pissant is nothing compared to the anti-Catholic and other anti religion self righteous jerks around here.
He's Pissant Lite. : )
Pathetic argument
I’m not interested in your deflection.
And you felt the need to share that?
Way to go!
As much as you felt the need to share your purported comment.
It's what happens around here.
Well thank you for your expertise on what happens around here.
That was so insightful.
Why would we get in line behind a candidate now. Primary season for 2012 has yet to even start.
Again...I’m not interested. Thanks.
For many like Bunga, Palin is a religion, so it’s worse. LOL
Correction. I attack the cultists, like you Chunck-a-spin, as mental midgets. There are plenty of normal Palin supporters that recognize the gal has strengths and weaknesses like any other politician. Heck, I even like her. The Cultists like you that go into conniption fits at all criticism, well, they are a different story.
It is highly amusing though.
Heckuva spin job by Titans, I must admit. Trust me, if Palin comes out 4 square against it - which she will be forced to do in a primary, the cultists will be the first to tell us what a sovereignty protecting warrior she is.
I haven’t - but I’m also not on a mission to destroy a consevative woman from AK.
Either am I. I’m just attempting to stop the coronation here of her as the only choice. It’s in full bloom. She’s just a politician with strengths and weaknesses like anyone else.
Nope. No one minds legitimate criticism of Sarah Palin. I mind misogynistic jackasses like you who attack her supporters with the language of the left and who denigrate and mock her enthusiasts using religious imagery and terminology.
Since I don’t think they should even be able to vote, what makes you think I’d want one as CIC.
13 posted on Friday, July 23, 2010 2:20:02 PM by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
ALL my criticisms of Palin are legitimate. The cultists have decided against all evidence that they aren’t, hence they are cultists...like you. I have plenty of normal conversations with Palin supporters. But when I get a pack of ankle biting “only Sarah” morons, whose goal it is to roam FR to kneecap the truth, then you deserve to get pounded.
Big time!
72 posted on Thursday, August 19, 2010 6:44:52 PM by Jim Robinson
Since I don’t think they should even be able to vote, what makes you think I’d want one as CIC.
13 posted on Friday, July 23, 2010 2:20:02 PM by pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.