Posted on 02/16/2007 8:30:44 AM PST by meg88
Yes, he is correct.
The only people on this site supporting Mayor Linguine D---are 9/11 fetishists, Hate Hillary Fetishists, celebrity worshippers, and coastal pseudocons.
LOL! I actually think Mike Reagan is right about this. No matter what, the 2008 candidate is always going to fall short.
Republicans will vote for Rudy regardless of what some on Free Republic say. Most people don't know what Free Republic is. They like Rudy and will vote for him.
Who has Duncan Hunter governed?
Take a breath an go find your own damn proof instead of trying to p.o. people who agree with you about gun rights.
Thank you Michael.
Excuse me, as you are the one making wild assertions, it is incumbent upon YOU to provide the proof for the wild assertions, not I. And if you agreed with me about gun rights, then you'd be pointing out Rudy's rotten record on the issue instead of making excuses for it.
Not really. I just pretend to. :)
Just saying we shouldn't focus solely on Hitlery. The other D candidates could be just as bad.
Let's not limit this to Hitlery, Osama Hussein and the others could be as bad.
Agreed. A candidate must be fully and consistently pro-life, not a flip-flopper like or a flamboyant social liberal like or a habitual liar like.
Some issues are foundational, and the right to life of every pre-born baby from conception forward is one of them.
Also, its interesting how some decry Duncan Hunter because he isnt a free trade fanatic, or Mike Huckabee because he supported some public works projects, or Sam Brownback because he realizes (like most voting Americans) that the current approach to Iraq is not working. Yet they support Mitt Romney, Giuliani, and McCain, despite the pro-abortion, pro-gay, anti-1st amendment, anti-2nd amendment views.
Lets be honest: we all have issues that are more important to us than other issues are. The question, via selection of a presidential nominee, is what issues should be prioritized. For me and millions of others, the right to life is #1.
Agreed. And also politically tone-deaf.
Which Reagan wasn't. Remember when Reagan Mocked the Rocking Chair?
So, really, it boils down to what issues are litmus tests, and why those issues are the top priority.
But on the -- not just one issue, but 4 or 5 ---issues that are most important to me at the Presidential level, Giuliani is a Democrat.
The big difference between him and Hil is, if Hil is elected, she will energize the emergence of an aroused, clanking, 24/7 opposition party which will block her every attempt to push a pro-baby-killng, pro-sweet-sodomy, pro-bigtime-illegal-immigration, pro-liberal-activist-judge agenda. And if Rudy is elected, it would be far harder to mobilize that kind of opposition: because the Repubs will be divided, and --- on the issues ---the Dems will be delighted.
And you can't tell me Giuliani would push for a Scalia or an Alito for USSC judge, no matter what he says. Why would he want to appoint judges that oppose his political position on abortion, gays, guns...?
Has he ever said a word against
And he would do a U-turn on this....why?
I believe the social conservatives will abdicate concerns about economics for a secure place at the party table.
I've been saying this for months now. Now that Michael Reagan has said some will actually realize this. But I'm not holding my breath on it.
I value the opinion of Reagan's Son than a self proclaimed Reagan Man. You got stuffed by Reagan's CONSERVATIVE son. Take that and chew on it :)
Go away little boy. Come back when you grow up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.