Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reefer is Worth Getting Mad About
Globe and Mail ^ | August 5, 2006 | Antonio Maria Costa

Posted on 08/06/2006 6:04:24 AM PDT by Wolfie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 581-582 next last
To: Know your rights
> Sheer idiocy. Just for starters, nobody has ever fatally overdosed on even the strongest marijuana.

Actually, just last year two dutch dock workers got hit by a falling crate containing 1 ton of Jack Herer. They probably were the first to die from weed overdose, but can you safely say they were the last?

21 posted on 08/06/2006 6:37:01 AM PDT by Schweinhund
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: T Minus Four
Speaking as an aging baby boomer, I never thought I'd be nostalgic over a $20 baggie of Mexican.

We must be from the same era.

My friends and I would pitch in $5 apiece and get a lid fo $20.

Once in awhile, we could scrape together the $40 for a bag of *gasp* Columbian.

22 posted on 08/06/2006 6:41:37 AM PDT by Skooz (Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights; Ken H
"Just for starters, nobody has ever fatally overdosed on even the strongest marijuana"

Would you call "fatally overdosing" a characteristic of a drug? I guess so. Yet you favor the legalization of heroin.

"Actually, Ken H has shown that drug addiction is higher in war-on-drug meccas like Singapore than it is in the USA."

KenH being the foremost expert on the subject, or a way for you to make a claim without taking responsibility for it? The latter, I'm guessing.

KenH is comparing two different cultures and claiming significance. That's like saying saki use in Japan is higher than in the U.S. because of Japanese laws.

23 posted on 08/06/2006 6:43:19 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Who wrote this piece - Count Floyd?

It was written by someone who obviously has never done a bong hit.

24 posted on 08/06/2006 6:47:45 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
So you're saying it's closer to the truth that G12 Skunk "is a gentle, harmless substance that gives you little more than a sense of mellow euphoria"?

You know that.

25 posted on 08/06/2006 6:48:10 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
So you're saying it's closer to the truth that G12 Skunk "is a gentle, harmless substance that gives you little more than a sense of mellow euphoria"?

Dosage is of course irrelevant. The "worst case scenario" is the baseline, and it only gets worse from there.

26 posted on 08/06/2006 6:51:53 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen; Ken H
Would you call "fatally overdosing" a characteristic of a drug?

I'd call the (im)possibility of producing a fatal overdose a characteristic of a drug.

I guess so. Yet you favor the legalization of heroin.

How is that relevant to the author's moronic claim that "The characteristics of cannabis are no longer that different from those of other plant-based drugs, such as cocaine and heroin"? Do you agree with that claim?

Actually, Ken H has shown that drug addiction is higher in war-on-drug meccas like Singapore than it is in the USA.

KenH being the foremost expert on the subject, or a way for you to make a claim without taking responsibility for it?

Ken H having collected and presented the data. (Doesn't make him the "foremost" expert ... but more so than either of us.)

KenH is comparing two different cultures and claiming significance.

I think Ken H is pointing out that cross-cultural evidence does not support the idea that "drug control works." But unlike you, I don't presume to put words in Ken H's mouth.

27 posted on 08/06/2006 6:52:05 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: T Minus Four

Dirt Weed Man!! Now, for nostalgia, how about $35 for a 5 finger lid of the Columbian......dat wuz sweeeet!


28 posted on 08/06/2006 6:52:37 AM PDT by jrg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Go to The Pukka Seed Company and scroll down to their description of G12 Skunk. if you'd like the DEA to be going through your garbage and tapping your phone line for the next two years... :)
29 posted on 08/06/2006 6:53:29 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

This one brought out the usual freeper suspects and marijuana users. LOL.


30 posted on 08/06/2006 6:54:26 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Gosh , I guess the BC & Amsterdam pot smokers must be flooding the emergency rooms & morgues, smoking all that powerful weed.

What? Their not? I did hear that piazza delivery orders are up in both locations!


31 posted on 08/06/2006 6:54:35 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
So you're saying it's closer to the truth that G12 Skunk "is a gentle, harmless substance that gives you little more than a sense of mellow euphoria"?

I'm saying that I'm confident that "This will put you in pieces, then reduce you to rubble -- maybe quicksand if you go too far" is laughable hype, not a basis for a sound pro-pot-ban argument.

32 posted on 08/06/2006 6:54:40 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
You were probably going to post more but forgot what it was...
33 posted on 08/06/2006 6:54:41 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
This one brought out the usual freeper suspects

Naw ... A CA Guy hasn't chimed in yet to proclaim the article's brilliance.

and marijuana users.

Which of the posters to this thread are marijuana users, and how do you know? Or are you just smearing advocates of liberty?

34 posted on 08/06/2006 6:57:09 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
You were probably going to post more but forgot what it was...

Have anything to say about the article, or are you just here to insult people?

35 posted on 08/06/2006 6:58:27 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

UN bureaucrats claiming the sky is falling get their due.


36 posted on 08/06/2006 6:59:20 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

It was a joke. Please go take a GIANT toke on your bong and mellow out. Loosen the wedgie up a few notches also.


37 posted on 08/06/2006 7:02:19 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Skooz

As my husband says, it's pathetic that at our age, when we talk about offering our guests some great Colombian after dinner.... it's just coffee. :)


38 posted on 08/06/2006 7:02:20 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
"I'd call the (im)possibility of producing a fatal overdose a characteristic of a drug."

Which might be significant if the author stated, "The characteristics of cannabis are no longer that different from those of other plant-based drugs, such as cocaine and heroin."

Go away.

"I think Ken H is pointing out that cross-cultural evidence does not support the idea that "drug control works."

How do you conclude that from "drug addiction is higher"? Drug control in Singapore could very well be working, just that drug addiction in Singapore is higher than in the U.S.

Heroin addiction is higher in Baltimore than in Chicago. What does that have to do with our drug control laws?

39 posted on 08/06/2006 7:04:52 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

P.S. No one authorized you to be Thread Nanny Cop. When I feel I need a little 'scold' nipping at my ankles, I'll ping you. Till then, butt out!


40 posted on 08/06/2006 7:08:46 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 581-582 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson