Posted on 05/12/2006 12:13:47 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
LOL - can I do it just till I need glasses?
"It's okay to say
the kids pricked their fingers, but
we cannot say they --"
So he evidently eats small children and tortures animals? What has his being an atheist to do with the validity of the website he directs?
Oh, I get it. Ad hominem. If you can't counter the ideas, insinuate the ideas' holder is a bad man. Typical liberal strategy, but it should work with the relatively ignorant masses.
Ahhhh, the core of evolution.
Well, just so long everyone knows that Dr. Scott is the director and an atheist. It is always good to understand who you are dealing with and what their agenda might be. In this case, Dr. Scott's agenda is crystal clear.
So, you can proudly claim NAZIism, which is a result of evolutionary doctrine.
So, the folks who are Christians at AIG and DI don't have agendas? Only atheists have agendas, huh?
Why just biology teachers? Why not all teachers who have molested students? If you can lump all "fundamentalists" together, certainly we can lump all teachers together. They are all the same, right?
I would expect a better argument from you, though it is late on a Friday so I'll give you a pass.
So then; most/many churches are NOT businesses?..
How many empolyees do American churches have?..
How big are their payrolls?..
No commercial application is silly.. or disinformation..
How much property(of all kinds) do American churchs control(own)?..
Thorp is delusional.. I've mentioned a small portion of America church economic impact.. Whether Evos worship the protein manipulator God is another issue.. completely..
Christians don't attempt to hide who they are.
"Will Mom or Dad Scientist want to live somewhere where their children are less likely to learn evolution?"
WTH, can't mom and dad scientists do their own teaching. End public education and STFU.
LOL...
Wait, I wanna be the first!!!
HITLER WAS A CHRISTIAN!!!
Ping - just in case you're bored this afternoon. LOL
To put it succinctly, evolution sells commercial applications; religion sells hope.
Why should individuals try to intelligently design cures for such diseases?
Wouldn't it be better to let such cures evolve through random selection?
I am intrigued as to the motives scientists might have for interfering with such natural processes.
:)
Waitaminit....
I thought Creationism was science? Now you're telling me that it's actually religion?
mlc9852: What they conveniently fail to mention is that Eugenie Scott is a self-professed atheist.
aimhigh: Ahhhh, the core of evolution.
It is interesting that the doctrine of evolution is a critical tenet of the religion of atheism.
Maybe he doesn't wear his atheism on his sleeve the way some Christians wear their religion. So what? I don't go around announcing I have no wisdom teeth. It doesn't mean I'm trying to hide that fact.
Gee, I don't know, saving lives, maybe?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.