Skip to comments.
Designed to deceive: Creation can't hold up to rigors of science
CONTRA COSTA TIMES ^
| 12 February 2006
| John Glennon
Posted on 02/12/2006 10:32:27 AM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560, 561-580, 581-600 ... 2,421-2,439 next last
To: Havoc
Evo nutbags? Useful idiots? I always enjoy it when the namecalling starts. Doesn't add a thing to the argument, but apparently that's not the point.
It is amusing, though.
To: CarolinaGuitarman
"When I take these debates too personally, I have to back off and regroup. Same here. Goodnight.
562
posted on
02/13/2006 6:57:00 PM PST
by
Eagles6
(Dig deeper, more ammo.)
To: VadeRetro
I did not know what you were talking about. It was a question.
563
posted on
02/13/2006 7:00:48 PM PST
by
Eagles6
(Dig deeper, more ammo.)
To: Eagles6
They were the answers to your question. You only get to demand one broomstick one time. You are expected to remember what the question was.
564
posted on
02/13/2006 7:02:52 PM PST
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: StoneGiant
Was remembering the 1979 Smithsonian exhibit with Julia Childes discussing premordial soup.
Just tip that cocoon a bit while the butterfly develops and see what you get. Eyesight to see these things is a wonderful thing. You put it all together in a masterful, logical article. Thank you!
565
posted on
02/13/2006 7:30:32 PM PST
by
WestwardHo
(Don't be afraid to ask a question.)
To: jennyp
A member of the Holly Bibble Evangellical Church of the Word.
566
posted on
02/13/2006 7:37:53 PM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
567
posted on
02/13/2006 7:44:47 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: furball4paws
This is cyberland. You can be anybody you want to.And you are only judged by the qualty of your posts.
568
posted on
02/13/2006 7:46:07 PM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Doctor Stochastic
Especially if you forget to do a spell check.
569
posted on
02/13/2006 7:52:37 PM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: VadeRetro
From your circumpect allusions it seems that you believe that the story of the Biblical flood and Noah is a fraud rather than a story or a legend and thus mak es the whole of the Bible suspect. As the Bible is the foundation of Christianity and Judaism and cannot be trusted, the whole of Western civilization now crumbles.
That being said, you are obviously free to believe in the Bible or not, literal reading or not.
I do believe your insults were uncalled for and propose that we now end our discussion.
570
posted on
02/13/2006 7:58:57 PM PST
by
Eagles6
(Dig deeper, more ammo.)
To: jennyp
Ah, an expert in wallowing in bovine fecies.. welcome. You here to help them guilt corn into growing green beans too..
571
posted on
02/13/2006 8:20:33 PM PST
by
Havoc
(Evolutionists and Democrats: "We aren't getting our message out" (coincidence?))
To: Dimensio
Well there's the theory then there's reality (assuming evolution is undirected, exists and does as it pleases) Amazing the limitations you can put on something nobody's ever witnessed.
572
posted on
02/13/2006 8:22:33 PM PST
by
Havoc
(Evolutionists and Democrats: "We aren't getting our message out" (coincidence?))
To: stands2reason
Yes, evo theorists are largely nutbags, I agree. "For experts there is no hole deep enough..." - The Russia House
573
posted on
02/13/2006 8:23:45 PM PST
by
Havoc
(Evolutionists and Democrats: "We aren't getting our message out" (coincidence?))
To: King Prout
Nah, just illustrating the absurd with absurdity. Usually the best way it seems. Effective too. And fun.
574
posted on
02/13/2006 8:25:19 PM PST
by
Havoc
(Evolutionists and Democrats: "We aren't getting our message out" (coincidence?))
To: Havoc
the absurdity you illustrate is your own, the ignorance you illustrate is your own.
you bring up the product of seeds as evidence bolstering your absurdity, completely missing the point that the seed is already fixed in genotype. the telling point is not that seeds produce the expected plant, but that sometimes the adult parent plant produces seeds which are *different*
575
posted on
02/13/2006 8:29:46 PM PST
by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
I gave you my specific objection - all of it is absurd. Not part of it, a little of it, etc. It's all absurd. From the pompous nature of being an expert on something never witnessed, never seen, never happening in human history. You guys are so desperate that I even saw someone try to renounce the concept of macroevolution as a misnomer in the last few days. I bout fell out of my chair laughing.
576
posted on
02/13/2006 8:30:45 PM PST
by
Havoc
(Evolutionists and Democrats: "We aren't getting our message out" (coincidence?))
To: bvw
LOL. If they don't like the intrusion of common sense, they redefine it. If they don't like the intrusion of reality, they redefine it. If something makes their theory and by extension - them - look like moronic babblings of an insane psychopath, they cut it loose - thus the attempt to hack macroevolution free. They've actually gone to the extreme of trying to push microevolution as a long term mechanism that sidesteps macro altogether.. bwahahahahahahahahahaha
577
posted on
02/13/2006 8:34:02 PM PST
by
Havoc
(Evolutionists and Democrats: "We aren't getting our message out" (coincidence?))
To: andysandmikesmom
The polls do not show a 50/50 split. Sorry. It showed, if memory serves, about half of America rejected it outright, while less than half believed something about the theory (eg micro 0r variation which is not exclusive to or specific of evolution).. in which case the numbers rejecting would be larger..
Really. No wishful thinking needed and it's getting worse for you as your number one fears travel the country opening eyes everywhere they go and saying the same things most americans actually believe - that evolution isn't much more than absurd quackery.
The great fears of the universe and the modern desecrators of liberal "truth" Ken Ham and Kent Hovind will be the end of Science as liberals know it. Come on and shriek for us to finish the picture .. bwahahahaha
578
posted on
02/13/2006 8:42:38 PM PST
by
Havoc
(Evolutionists and Democrats: "We aren't getting our message out" (coincidence?))
To: Havoc
I simply dont believe what you say...perhaps we have read different polls...so we disagree, nothing new...
I still maintain, you are certainly engaging in nothing but wishful thinking...only time will show which one of us is wrong and who is right...I am not at all worried...
To: PatrickHenry
Until Evolutionists can create something out of nothing, they can talk all they want.
And didn't Darwin himself convert to Christianity before he died?
580
posted on
02/13/2006 8:54:49 PM PST
by
Californiajones
("The apprehension of beauty is the cure for apathy" - Thomas Aquinas)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560, 561-580, 581-600 ... 2,421-2,439 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson