Skip to comments.
Creation evangelist derides evolution as ‘dumbest’ theory [Kent Hovind Alert!]
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Post ^
| 17 December 2005
| Kayla Bunge
Posted on 12/17/2005 3:58:48 AM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 2,121-2,129 next last
To: rollo tomasi
Never read any of Tacitus's work I presume.Tacitus lived over a hundred years after the time Jesus was supposed to have lived. As such, he's no more reliable than you would be writing of your memories of Abraham Lincoln.
I'm not saying there was no Jesus, just that there's no direct evidence outside of the Christian Bible.
341
posted on
12/17/2005 12:01:32 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
(Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
To: XeniaSt
" Nominally Christians.
Surely not a follower of the Christ.
He who created the universe from nothing and told us how He did it."
He didn't say how he did it.
342
posted on
12/17/2005 12:02:26 PM PST
by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
To: sirchtruth
Since he was raided by the IRS about a year and a half ago, there's probably an indictment looming in his relatively near future.
Yes, and this is the same stuff evolution is made up of, halftuths, speculative B.S. wishful thinking...
Thank you for providing a perfect example of the idiocy of agendized science.
But it's the "charge" that matters....
//sarcasm
343
posted on
12/17/2005 12:02:54 PM PST
by
Waywardson
(Carry on! Nothing equals the splendor!)
To: CarolinaGuitarman
Einstein was a scientist wasn't he?"
He was also an evolutionist.
He was??? So when he said, "God doesn't roll dice with the universe" he, in fact, believed God DID roll dice with the universe?
344
posted on
12/17/2005 12:03:41 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
To: Alter Kaker; rollo tomasi
I'm not saying there was no Jesus, just that there's no direct evidence outside of the Christian Bible. A Jewish Historian named Josephus.
b'shem Y'shua
345
posted on
12/17/2005 12:04:06 PM PST
by
Uri’el-2012
(Y'shua <==> YHvH is my Salvation (Psalm 118-14))
To: peyton randolph
It is all about fleecing the flock.
Note that I didn't include the links for the above in the public interest.
You should have included the link. Then everyone would know that all of this information is made available for free download OR you can make a donation of your own free will to help spread the message.
The only one doing the fleecing is you... and yer busted.
346
posted on
12/17/2005 12:04:50 PM PST
by
Waywardson
(Carry on! Nothing equals the splendor!)
To: XeniaSt
A Jewish Historian named Josephus.
You mean the man whose name was falsely attributed to a forged account easily recognized because the writing style bears no resemblance to his real style?
347
posted on
12/17/2005 12:04:53 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Alter Kaker
You know as well as I that Einstein was no creationist.So Einstein believed in God but he didn't believe God created the universe?
348
posted on
12/17/2005 12:05:04 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
To: Texas Eagle
He was??? So when he said, "God doesn't roll dice with the universe" he, in fact, believed God DID roll dice with the universe?Einstein made that statement in opposition to quantum theory, not evolution. And he later retracted his opposition to quantum theory.
Are you being dishonest or do you really believe this stuff?
349
posted on
12/17/2005 12:05:44 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
(Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
To: Full Court
350
posted on
12/17/2005 12:05:51 PM PST
by
MRMEAN
(Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
To: Texas Eagle
He was??? So when he said, "God doesn't roll dice with the universe" he, in fact, believed God DID roll dice with the universe?
Are you just grasping at straws because you're too afraid to do the research into the reference, or do you actually know better and are just lying about Einstein?
Either way, Einstein was not a creationist. It is a lie for you to try and claim that he was.
351
posted on
12/17/2005 12:05:59 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: CarolinaGuitarman
BTW, was this supposed to be a list of anti-Darwinians?No. It was supposed to be a list of scientists who believed in God.
352
posted on
12/17/2005 12:05:59 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
To: PatrickHenry
the Apologetics Association (AA)AA?
Hi, my name is Revolting cat! and I'm an apologetic.
353
posted on
12/17/2005 12:06:02 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: Texas Eagle
So Einstein believed in God but he didn't believe God created the universe?I believe in God. But like Einstein, I accept evolution. Why is this so hard to understand?
354
posted on
12/17/2005 12:06:24 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
(Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
To: Texas Eagle
"He was??? So when he said, "God doesn't roll dice with the universe" he, in fact, believed God DID roll dice with the universe?"
You obviously have no clue as to what the above quote pertains to. He was talking about quantum physics. The Uncertainty principle. Not about stochastic events at a higher level. He believed in evolution.
So, why did you include Newton and Bacon in as anti-Darwinians when they were dead long before the theory was formulated? And why did you include Pasteur when he believed in evolution?
355
posted on
12/17/2005 12:06:35 PM PST
by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
To: CarolinaGuitarman
And why did you include Pasteur when he believed in evolution?
I thought that Pasteur didn't accept evolution -- but then, the only references I can find are creationist sites.
356
posted on
12/17/2005 12:07:20 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Texas Eagle
No. It was supposed to be a list of scientists who believed in God.Oh, when you have a chance, add me to the list. I'm not as good a scientist, granted, but I'm sure my faith is as strong.
357
posted on
12/17/2005 12:07:21 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
(Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
To: freedumb2003
Isaac would have loved that :)
358
posted on
12/17/2005 12:07:51 PM PST
by
RightWingAtheist
("Why thank you Mr.Obama, I'm proud to be a Darwinist!")
To: Dimensio; Texas Eagle
"Virulence appears in a new light which cannot but be alarming to humanity; unless nature, in her evolution down the ages (an evolution which, as we now know, has been going on for millions, nay, hundreds of millions of years), has finally exhausted all the possibilities of producing virulent or contagious diseases -- which does not seem very likely."
-Louis Pasteur, evolutionist
359
posted on
12/17/2005 12:08:07 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
(Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
To: Dimensio
Even if it's completely authentic, Josephus was also born after the Crucifixion, and not a contemporary of Christ.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 2,121-2,129 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson