Posted on 07/04/2004 5:19:27 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
Proceedings: Biological Sciences May 07, 2004, vol. 271, no. 1542, pp. 893-901(9)
Liebers D.[1]; de Knijff P.[2]; Helbig A.J.[1]
[1] Institute of Zoology, University of Greifswald, Vogelwarte Hiddensee, 18565 Kloster, Germany [2] Forensic Laboratory for DNA Research, MGC-Department of Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9503, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
Abstract:
Under what circumstances speciation in sexually reproducing animals can occur without geographical disjunction is still controversial. According to the ring-species model, a reproductive barrier may arise through 'isolation by distance' when peripheral populations of a species meet after expanding around some uninhabitable barrier. The classical example of this kind of speciation is the herring gull (Larus argentatus) complex, with a circumpolar distribution in the Northern Hemisphere. Based on mitochondrial DNA variation among 21 gull taxa, we show that members of this complex differentiated largely in allopatry following multiple vicariance and long-distance-colonization events, not primarily through isolation by distance. Reproductive isolation evolved more rapidly between some lineages than between others, irrespective of their genetic distance. Extant taxa are the result of divergent as well as reticulate evolution between two ancestral lineages originally separated in a North Atlantic refugium and a continental Eurasian refugium, respectively. Continental birds expanded along the entire north Eurasian coast and via Beringia into North America. Contrary to the ring-species model, we find no genetic evidence for a closure of the circumpolar ring through colonization of Europe by North American herring gulls. However, closure of the ring in the opposite direction may be imminent, with lesser black-backed gulls about to colonize North America.
Yes, I read it and the title is quite correct. Frogs don't have glass asses.
Dead thread placemarker.
RIP.
What a weird question. Belief and proof are two quite different phenomena, hence one need not prove -- much less prove 'scientifically' -- an afterlife to be credulous of it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.