DEFAMATION -- LIBEL AND SLANDER [Florida Law - FReepers Heed]

Florida Bar Association ^

[honeygrl]

heh.. no fair.. i wanna call someone names too.

Hey Laz: You're a ho! ;)

[general_re]

What you said ;)

[concerned about politics]

honeygrl (All of the above is JUST MY OPINION)

Hey! Good one !!!

[honeygrl]

lol not bad.. not bad..

[Lazamataz]

Hey Laz: You're a ho! ;)

You'll be hearing from my lawyer, one_particular_harbor.

[Lazamataz]

Leaving aside the fact that you can buy me sexually for money, of course.

[dogbyte12]

I stated plainly in post #648 that OPH offered some pro bono legal advice to the Network when it started up, but soon thereafter we engaged a DC attorney and firm with experience in non profits who is our attorney of record. Since that time, we have not asked OPH for advice and none has been offered.

I take you at your word Bob. However, I still think it is important and relevant to know if Chancy is OPH. Again, I accept that he no longer consults for FRN, but do you understand why somebody posting a thinly veiled legal threat, AND who also used to consult with FRN, allegedly, might ethically be compelled to reveal who he is?

That is all. I feel this thread should be pulled in the meanwhile. If Chancy does have ulterior motives, perhaps related to the time he was here under a different name, consulting for FRN, but not for FR or Jim directly, then this is a bad faith effort at intimidating his critics.

I am a neutral observer in this fight vis a vis Florida btw. I was very conflicted by issues on both sides of the case, and do not have strong feelings one way or the other, or more accurately, I do have strong feelings for both sides of the argument.

Chancellor Palpatine was very heavily involved, directly in those threads, and he wrote this thread, which can be construed to be an intimidation effort of those who disagreed with him.

His identity, his conflicts of interest are relevent, IMHO anyways. Until he honestly accounts for himself, I believe this thread is a pernicious effort to curtail anonymous speech, done anonymously, through possibly a second pseudonym. There is some irony involved here.

[Neets]

What youse both said.

[Thumper1960]

Good thing not a crack 'ho.

[harrowup]

Since that time, we have not asked OPH for advice and none has been offered.

OPH no longer exists. Do you know why? It isn't any of my business but these deflections are worse than you and John jousting with the anti-freepers in their caves.

"When you have facts on your side, pound the facts. When you don't have facts on your side, pound the table"

Well now, Bob, you have the facts. I am sitting on my hands. Do you know why OPH's posts were deleted and do you know what happened to him?

[IncPen]

"Whydya Care?

Clearly this thread stems from arguments on other threads.

My concern goes to the integrity of the forum, hence my post to Jim that he answered at post #483. Jim's not worried about the forum, so why is Palpatine offering pro-bono legal advice?

Palpatine's been all over this thread braying about something that, it seems to me, is clear to all of us (the issue of libel), and all of us can make our own judgements about what we say and accept the consequences for doing so.

Who is Palpatine to issue a blanket warning to the forum?

It seems to me that, based on the suggestions of posters to this thread, Palpatine is trying to stifle dissent with his point of view regarding matters pending in Florida.

I'm simply asking the guy to come clean, which, if he has nothing to hide, shouldn't be a problem, should it?

I'll give him the benefit of the doubt for now that he's off the thread, but he sure as hell was answering others and ignoring my posts to him.

_{I notice his cohorts have quieted down some}

Palpatine? What say you?

[Neets]

You contradict yourself all over that post dude....

[honeygrl]

rofl! the usual price?

[Catspaw]

(who's Catspaw?)

Ow. I'm a parenthetical statement.

That hurts.

[dogbyte12]

You contradict yourself all over that post dude....

I will let the other readers decide that. Thanks for your opinion though.

[honeygrl]

"Good thing not a crack 'ho. "

Whitney Houston is the crack ho.. (see tagline)

[Bob J]

I don't have a dog in this fight and I don't know if OPH is CP, other than what people have alleged. I do not think I have ever posted to CP since that account was created. I'd prefer if you'd keep the FRN out of it as we really have no idea what is going on here. I'd guess the same goes for Jim.

[Jim Robinson]

Hey, I don't smoke cigars or otherwise. And I really don't care one way or the other. Just put in my two bits to try to clear up a couple factual questions. Could care less about any of this stuff anyway. The only important thing is, when's liberty call?

[Thumper1960]

Poor Whitney.

Being legally bound to Bobby Brown would drive ya to drugs, it is said.

Too bad. I used to have the hots for Whitney.

(sigh)