Posted on 01/25/2012 1:40:28 PM PST by jcsjcm
I will not diss Orly, since I believe her heart is in the right place. But, she isn’t doina any of us any favors by being in the limelight on this subject. Her case is not the case I am watching. I really don’t believe she understands that this is not about the certificate.
The whole issue is about the Natural born citizen clause. And if you have read any letter that has come out of any office including the DNC or his lawyers, they always talk about him being an American Citizen or a citizen or doubting his citizenship. They never divulge the constitutional issue of being a natural born citizen as per Article 2. They refuse to make any statement as to natural born. That is because they know that this is the issue that most of us are arguing on. Not the Birth certificate. I could care less about that.
yada yada yada - yeah he’s an American citizen, but so is Rubio yet he could never run for President.
I think her batting average is still better than Larry Klayman’s. ;)
Just some FRiendly advice. Take your comments that have no factual backing to the echo chamber at fogbow, you will gain FRiends....
OK, but is used as an adjective by the inclusion of ly. So am I to assume that this attorney is suggesting that the SoS issued the order for a hearing by mistake? So he will “withdraw” because this attorney says he is mistaken? I think not.
Yeah? What's that?
Take your comments that have no factual backing to the echo chamber at fogbow
Never heard of it.
Wait, let's see.. AHH! You're a 2009 n00b!
Maybe you should STFU and go back wherever you came from.
Have a blessed day and don't be a tard so much.
I am still surprised by how many people think this can be fixed by voting. I highly doubt there will be any kind of fair election, even if there was, do you honestly think anything will be that turned around? The reset button needs to be hit, and return to the original constitution, before any additions, and start over. This ship is too far beneath the waves to be re-floated and sailed.
You’re the low level scumbag!
“There is no right against self-incrimination in an Administrative Law Hearing.”
Wow! What’s the authority for that? The right against self-incrimination is constitutional. It’s hard to imagine a regulatory body being granted extra-constitutional powers.
I’m not getting involved in the “debate” pro-birther, anti-birther, etc. I just want to point out that you shouldn’t really harbor any hopes of a decisive result of any kind tomorrow. At best, the Court will briefly convene, review the procedural status, including Jablonski’s letter, offer Taitz and any other counsel for the parties who appears to weigh in on the situation and then give some guidance on a procedure going forward. Even if he outright rejects Jablonski’s suggestions and his refusal to appear, he would, at best issue some kind of order for another date to hear why he shouldn’t hold Obama and possibly Jablonski in contempt for knowingly disregarding the subpoena.
Look, to one and all, there are valid arguments for and against pursuing these issues. I pray that it doesn’t have to be so contentious among the good patriots on this website. Leaving aside the political wisdom of pursuing the question of Obama’s eligibility to run for or to be President, isn’t it a burning question that should bother us no end? In legal circles, we use the phrase “colorable claim “ to describe a claim that has legs, has some apparent basis to be subjected to scrutiny and adjudication. It may seem, in some respects, unusual, even strange, but there is enough there there to clearly understand that it is not just concocted out of thin air.
So it is with Obama’s eligibility. Although the birth certificate issue has been awfully muddied, the question of NBC status seems like a very clear-cut issue. There is substantial precedent for the principle that NBC requires two American citizen parents and we know that Obama does not meet this definition. Obama’s spectacularly hypocritical lack of transparency regarding so many of his personal records only adds fuel to the fire of doubt about his status.
Please don’t flame me for this. I’m just saying that politics aside, isn’t the question a real question?
Hummergobbler could start his own thread.
Like this?:
snip-”New evidence conclusively establishes that 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions were sabotaged then republished at Justia.com during the run up to the ’08 election. My prior report documented the scrubbing of just two cases. But last week, a third sabotaged case was discovered which led to a thorough examination of all US Supreme Court cases which cite “Minor v. Happersett” as they appeared on Justia.com between 2006 and the present.”
Seems Harrison J. Bounel (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro, Barak Hussein Obama, Steve Dunham) may be just a skosh nervous.
You got spunk tonight Hummy.
Yes thats the rub. I hope they can drag it out long enough that Obama never gets on the ballot.
I think the Sec of State just torpedoed the SS Obama on their cry baby letter.
Could he now?
On what topic specifically?
Come on, speak up with some specifics.
Don't just hang behind and talk about folks behind their backs.
Puss-dripping cowards do that.. don't be one of those.
Or is it too late?
On the topic of drinking alone.
Alone does one drink top shelf or rotgut.
Believe it, obot. It's just a matter of time before you get your well deserved ZOT.
I will make sure I post that jpg of Nelson doing his HaHa.
Whatever.
Anybody who thinks Taitz is a loon is an “obot”?
Really?
So.. she’s going to take down Obama any day now, right?
Gets all of her legal stuff done right too? No errors?
Look, Jack..
Folks can think Taitz is a loon without supporting Obama.
Just because she has an anti-Obama cause does not automatically make her correct or smart or sane.
She is none of the above.
Maybe you should find a COMPETENT lawyer to run the case.
Then nobody would make fun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.