Posted on 09/19/2025 7:14:41 PM PDT by TigerClaws
He might have funneled the money into shell companies.
Nancy isn’t the one who was making the money, it was her husband and his investing.
Nancy Pelosi had all of the inside trading information & ordered her husband to make the stock deals.
Nancy Pelosi is 100% guilty of insider trading.
To defend Nancy Pelosi is absolutely despicable!
Shut up. I wasn’t defending Nancy Pelosi. I am well aware of the insider trading. I was commenting on how it was her husband’s job of investeing that produced Nancy’s money. While Nancy likely was engaging in insider trading using her job as a Congressperson to gain said info, her actual job and salary didn’t directly result in her net worth.
You lie!
You wrote: “Nancy isn’t the one who was making the money, it was her husband and his investing.”
You wrote: “I wasn’t defending Nancy Pelosi.”
You lie!
LOL...telling me to “Shut up” is typical of a leftwing fascist avoiding the truth!
Left wing fascist. Right. Hey, maybe you could be AOC’s VP when she runs for President. Two intellectual heavy weights.
LOL...you leftists are such emotionally driven, low IQ children/brats.
But...but...I just read that Biden’s broke!
There is something wrong with you.
LOL...avoiding substantive facts I presented to emotionally reply like a child/brat.
Thanks for outing yourself...buh-bye.
Uss joes 10% 
The USS DNC "Our" Democracy
Neither was Joey.
That is why MTG used term the "crime family".
But make no mistake, Nanzi was the boss, the Godmother, if you will.
That is borne out by the numbers although estimates of net worth are inaccurate and vary, I saw one estimate of 370 million combined net worth with Paulie's net worth at 100 million.
As to your original statement, you may be right about the one making the money.
But Nanzi has gotten her greedy hands on two and half more times of it than Paulie.
That is how crime families work, the "big guy" in this case Nanzi accumulate the largest share of the boodle.
While others take the risks and take a hammer to the head.
I think my point was her actual salary from her actual job did not pay the salary to justify her net worth. I’m fully aware of the other elements that filled her bank account and her husband’s. On paper it was her husband’s investing (insudectrading info aside) that was their reasoning for the net worth, not Nancy’s job in Congress.
Indeed there is...
SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTS-—BANK MUST SUBMIT SUCH REPORTS WHEN TRANSACTIONS OVER $10,000 in CASH OCCUR-—WORLDWIDE
Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.