Posted on 08/29/2025 7:49:08 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
1. New census in the works
2. Republican gerrymandering
3. The USAID-DNC funding line has been cut; and dems are not generous people anyway
4. Mid-Terms (the DNC has nothing to run on and they are losing on every issue)
Super majority and impeachment of activist judges. That’s how you stop it.
RE: We’re in a state of a cold civil war. Let’s get heated up!
True. That’s why all the identical wording of the Dems about fighting, bringing various weapons to the battle, we’re going to war for democracy, we’re going to punch you, California will resist ICE, the people of my city of Chicago will rise up soon...
The war is heating up day by day.
RE: impeachment of activist judges
What are the details on how that happens? US Senate? House?
Judicial oversight committees?
Who has the facts, please?
A handful of Liberal Judges and Trump is neutered. They can keep up the Lawsuits and ruling and keep Trump in check until the next election—then tar VD Vance, trumps people with scandals and lies. Bring forth the new Kennedy! Young, Fresh, New Englander? Great speaker, rock star haircut, no baggage and a beautiful wife to put on the covers of all the magazines. He must be scandal free, an unknown. It will be good if he’s smart (but not needed as he will be told what to do). His “New Frontier” (New Deal revamped) will sweep the nation. He will be a patriot too (maybe a war hero?). Many in MAGA will vote for him over “Hillbilly Vance”. Watch as the New Democrats will take over in the midterms, and win the White House in three and a half years. Happy Days are Here again (for the Democrat corruption machine).
Thank you.
Good Dog.
The courts have ZERO role in an emergency declaration and he can ignore them. The only check on an emergency declaration is that congress can override it with legislation he cannot override, or removing him with impeachment.
The court literally has no role. The emergency is a declaration of system override. Congress is the only check on that with their ultimate superior position.
Blondie is a moron. The courts have no standing over an emergency declaration. It’s literally a president declaring he must step outside the structure of law due to a “national emergency”.
The sole remedy if it is done wrongly is through the superior branch, Congress, that can impeach him and create legislation voiding his emergency.
The courts have no black letter role in this process, not even the supremes.
If you dig deep enough you’ll probably find that these judges or their spouses are being affected by the tariffs in some way
Two of the dissenters were Obama appointees
“Reciprocal tariffs are a big part of why Americans voted for President Trump—it was a cornerstone of his campaign from the start.”
Actually, it was almost never discussed during the election. And there is a good chance how he is doing it IS illegal and unconstitutional. That I’m glad he is doing it is legally irrelevant.
I was never a fan of hers but I don’t criticize her like so many here do. She has her hands full with oppositional staff to manage/get rid of, Epstein, Russiagate, and all of the lawfare lobbed Pres Trumps while trying to do his job. She deserves props at the very least for managing all if this.
I think they did so a few months back (forgot the actual decision, sorry) and the lower courts are still ignoring it.
Trump is going thru the legal process and once out of lower courts, he wins. Trumps team is neutering the judges.
If the courts can succeed substituting Article III judgment for Article I and/or Article II judgment on tariffs, the grim consequences for our economy cannot be overstated. All the trillions of dollars that Trump has induced foreign entities to invest in the United States by intimidating them over tariffs will evaporate. Our economy will decline as the opportunity cost will be immense.
The businesses, domestic and imported, that would be expected to flourish in a tariff protected environment will simply die inchoate together with the employment opportunities they might have created.
The increased revenue generated by tariffs flowing to the federal government to cover deficits will diminish or disappear altogether.
Trump's brilliant record of negotiating peace deals between warring nations will probably draw to a close because he will have lost the power to reward and punish the belligerents with tariff policy.
A positive decision in the United States Supreme Court is by no means certain, I put it no better than 50-50.
We know that the three leftists will vote reflexively against Donald Trump. Thomas, Scalia and Gorsich have already made statements that suggest they will support Trump's tariff policy. Cavanaugh is a likely affirmative vote. Barrett is a loose cannon and clearly unreliable. The Chief Justice, however, is a fifth column in black robes who will no doubt be very concerned to protect the prerogatives and power of the judicial branch, that implies an opinion that will certify supervision of tariffs by the judicial branch.
We will probably need either Barrett or Chief Justice Roberts to push the number up to five and I believe that is a tossup.
Courts since the beginning of time have reached decisions and then worked backwards to justify those decisions. A favorite technique used to reach the favored result while pretending to do justice involves selective labeling. Once the label is decided, the verdict is set.
If this matter is labeled as a question of tariff law or a question of reasonable loan of powers by the legislative to executive, the case will be lost.
On the other hand, if the case is labeled a question of foreign policy, traditionally the more exclusive province of the executive, Trump will prevail.
We shall see.
How soon before the public simply accepts the fact it is okay for a Federal Judge to be arrested?
So an unelected judge can stop an elected President from decision making. What is the role of Congress if an unelected judge has such authority?
Heck, why do we need a congress if the unelected judges can make these types of decisions?
GOTCHA!!
Just respond with, “we’ll work under the powers given in the Constitution - where these judges aren’t even mentioned”.
Judges of the Federal Circuit are interfering with the President’s vital and constitutionally central role in foreign policy.
Indeed nothing a left judge hates more then someone with more legal power then they do.
It’s why the left are in a group TDS mode.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.