Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/20/2025 6:01:27 AM PDT by whyilovetexas111
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
We gave them both up long after directed military conflict. It was political failure, not a military failure. So was Vietnam.
I run the ArmstrongEconomics scam site.
The worth of my advice can be measured by my three bankruptcies and losing over $700,000,000 of my clients' funds in bad trades.
That failed ponzi scheme got me eleven years in the federal pen.
signed, Martin Armstrong
“You post one of these articles every day. You have never posted a story referencing air superiority of US forces.”
Delta7 is pro Russia, anti-USA.
“The ONLY way to defend against our insane Neocons is to pull together as a united front with Russia, China, North Korea, and others against the West.”
1 posted on 8/4/2025, 12:40:57 PM by delta7
It was political failure, not a military failure
————-
The enemy won, they achieved their goals in removing us. “ War” has many aspects, the one with a superior military no longer dictates the outcome, as we are witnessing worldwide.
The US is all shock and awe, depleted inside a month. They are learning much from Russia’s war of attrition, we have no defense ( or stomach) against that.
Years after the actual conduct of war.
“ War” has many aspects, the one with a superior military no longer dictates the outcome, as we are witnessing worldwide.
Which is why I'm accusing you of relying upon subjective definitions.
Who is ours built for?
Two wars were fought, complete with beginnings and endings. That's why people refer to GWI and GWII and that's why you knew what "GWI" and "GWII meant." AFTER those wars, a separate party got involved (Iran) who was never part of either of those two wars both supporting an insurgency and tweaking the Iraqi government.
Adhering to the definition, the two wars were won. The peace was lost. Same story in Vietnam and Afghanistan.
Your thesis is as if the British banking system took over this country, therefore we lost the Revolutionary War. It confuses and distorts the record of military conflicts with political change for purely rhetorical purposes. That is why subjective definitions are therefore dishonest. It's what leftists do.
Nope, just like their stuff. The font is nice and big and I can see it. I can’t see a lot of sites as I have some eye issues.
“”””China has no military objectives outside China and its territorial waters. Never has, and never will.””””
China is trying to build the world’s biggest military just to keep someone from invading them, or not allowing free trade movement of their shipping?
Who is out to conquer China?
Do you think all those nations who live in fear of China conquering them believe what you claim?
———“The ONLY way to defend against our insane Neocons is to pull together as a united front with Russia, China, North Korea, and others against the West.”
1 posted on 8/4/2025, 12:40:57 PM by delta7————
Did delta actually say that?
Logistics wins the war. Our history of winning, from CW to WW2, relied on numbers. We don’t have that output capacity anymore. We can’t beat China in their own backyard. Good news is, their planes can’t actually reach us over here.
You haven’t responded. I guess that means you actually said this.
———“The ONLY way to defend against our insane Neocons is to pull together as a united front with Russia, China, North Korea, and others against the West.”
1 posted on 8/4/2025, 12:40:57 PM by delta7————
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.