Posted on 06/09/2023 10:31:09 PM PDT by dominusobiscum
Gee, I wish I was making money by posting here...
God Bless You.
Someone you don't know that you can't even identify says something you want to hear and that's the truth? No wonder you have to live the life of a retread.
What a silly little comment, wrapped in "God." Rather like the reverend mother, who prays for Ukraine but not for peace in Ukraine. Speedy is another matter, with the singing and dancing over deaths.
Free Republic is for the greatest part an assembly of anonymous individuals. One could be "anyone," and so personal assertions about not making money are, of course, not verifiable. One cannot prove this. One cannot NOT prove it either. Ergo your assertion is an assertion, and being anonymous is remains an assertion.
What three of your political clan do is daily post a link to one essentially monetized URL. Daily for the most part. Your post goes to an obvious example of "fund raising" to a single individual who repackages news from some sources and presents it as his "work." And then fund-raises, as I documented in a previous comment.
Lucky "Report from Ukraine" who is pulling in the equivalent of a full-time income via repackaged news. You could learn to rake in some dough from studying him....
Russian Forces Repelled All Ukranian Attacks l Ukranian Counteroffensive Failed In Every Direction
Its on a map so it must be twue!
Its as if making money is a bad thing. You think the pro russian bloggers are doing it out of the goodness of their heart?
Of course not, and I am sure there are grifters all around the world and working in and around all sorts of topics.
But since you mention "the pro russian bloggers," I surely would love to learn some of the monikers with which the "pro russian bloogers" are posting daily here on Free Republic. Have you any Freeper names to mention?
Sure Kazan for one posts stuff all the time.
Mcgregors stuff is posted all the time here. Moonoveralabam stuff is posted here all the time. Why arent you bellyaching over that?
If u have a problem, take it up with the owners of this site and stop the whining.
While the Western media persists in perpetuating the fantasy that Russia is suffering setbacks and looking for a way to extricate itself from the war in Ukraine, the facts on the ground show that Russia is inflicting massive casualties on Ukraine — both men and materiel — and that Russia is under no pressure to seek an end to the conflict. Nothing short of unconditional surrender will placate Russia.
Ukraine, however, has ample reasons to bring the war to an end. Rational military commanders on the Ukrainian side must now understand that their prospects for inflicting a devastating blow to the Russian military forces is becoming less likely with each passing hour. Russia’s advantages in terms of men, artillery, and air support are thwarting Ukraine’s military ambitions. I do not discount the possibility that Ukraine’s military commanders realize that continued attacks are futile and that securing a negotiated end to the conflict is their only hope of surviving. If this report is true it signals a growing rift between the military and political leaders in Ukraine. The only solution is to overthrow the government of Volodomyr Zelensky by the military and sue for peace. If that happens it will mark the defeat of NATO. Count me as a skeptic. I think the blood shed will continue.
-----------------------------
Silly fellow. I am not whining. I am examining using this marvelous Free Republic and documenting some things. Of the names you've listed above, the last two do not post any links to articles at all.
So, in the absence of whining....
One may examine the posts of articles by date in Free Republic's fine "in forum" chronological listing, wherein "1 of X" indicates the initial post by an Freeper. Since the beginning of this month ----
Looking through the "in forum" list of Kazan as "initial poster," I find a "1 of X" link to an American Thinker article titled "Trump Was Right About Russia."
I find a second "1 of X" link to a Gateway Pundit article, "Reporter Asks John Kirby on Claims That Russia Destroyed the Dam: “Doesn't Seem Logical, Similar to Blowing Up One's Own Pipeline.”
A third, from Scotland Today, titled "An act of Insanity as Zelenskyy orders the destruction of the Kakhovskaya Hydroelectric Dam."
A fourth, from American Thinker, titled "Biden's foreign policy bungling is creating a massive long-term crisis."
A fifth from Gateway Pundit, titled "RUSSIA CANCELS MORE UKRAINIAN AIR DEFENSES WHILE THE U.S. ADMITS THE ECONOMY IS STALLING."
And a sixth from Breitbart, titled "Poll: Trump Increases Lead to 28 Points After DeSantis Campaign Launch."
A seventh from Breitbart, titled "Survey: Donald Trump Trounces Ron DeSantis on Major Issues."
Certainly American Thinker, Gateway Pundit and Breitbart are not what you would call "pro russin bloggers." Or maybe you would?
Source: https://freerepublic.com/tag/by:kazan/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change
By comparison to Kazan's somewhat wider range, looking to your "in forum" listing for "1 of X" over the equivalent period of time, one finds:
"Reporting from Ukraine," on 9 June,
"Reporting from Ukraine 6/9" posted on 8 June,
"Reporting from Ukraine 6/7" posted on 7 June,
"Reporting from Ukraine 6/5" on 5 June,
"Reporting from Ukraine 6/4" on 4 June,
"Reporting from Ukraine 6/3" on 3 June,
"Reporting from Ukraine 6/1" on 1 June.
Source: https://freerepublic.com/tag/by:dominusobiscum/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change
You post the same daily click bait to one "Reporting from Ukraine," as your own "in forum" chronological list shows in detail. Or as you said of Kazan, "all the time."
I am not "bellyaching" nor "whining." I am dcoumenting by your own posts that "all the time" refers to you, not Kazan in terms of posting an article to direct click traffic. His posts are eclectic, while yours have been consistently pointing to and thereby promoting one site.
If you have a problem with my documenting this with details from Free Republic's own data, you make your complaint to "the owners of this site."
Yes as i said before, i post from only one site, the site i like the best. If that is a problem with u, take it up to management.
But it is so-o-o lovely having you put it so plainly. Promoting a "blogger" is a thing. And it is YOUR thing. Although you whined about Kazan....
Ah ha, another OTHER-PEOPLE’S-MONEY Noob.
“Promoting a “blogger” is a thing. And it is YOUR thing. “
and your point is?
Z Man says the counteroffensive is also defensive.
“The world’s wealthiest country can’t spray paint a Bradley before it fights in Europe”.
All other Ukraine Bradleys were in forest green. Picture was Russian propaganda from Desert Storm.
Bradleys are painted in digital green before counter-offensive.
Peter Zeihn is quoted widely on geopolitical issues. I’d give him a “follow”.
One quick example:
https://youtube.com/shorts/umRn7vsUg7E?feature=share4
Yeah he sounds legit. Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.