Brunson Brothers Make History - The FULL Story

The KUWL Report | Substack ^ | William Quinn & Robert Cunningham

[philman_36]

If the shoe fits, wear it.

If the creek is shallow, cross it.

[philman_36]

Do better.
You appear to think that it is perfectly fine for a sitting POTUS to NOT be immediately arrested and removed from office if he is judged guilty in a court of law no matter what they did.
You propose leaving this person in office, in power, until an impeachment hearing can be conducted and concluded.

What if the charge is treason and provable beyond all doubt?

Better?

[Degaston]

You haven’t even provided one single example of a similar Petition that followed the same path with SCOTUS that didn’t end up DENIED.

Step #1 Petition filed
Step #2 Solicitor General waives right to Respond
Step #3 Petition is scheduled for Conference
Step #4 Clerk doesn’t make a Call for a Response before the scheduled Conference

Every single Petition that has followed these 4 steps like the Brunsons’ petition has ended up being Denied. Numerous Clerks who have worked for the Court have said that it’s because the Petitions are Dead Listed due to none of the Justices and their Clerks requesting to even put the Petition on the Discuss List. If any of them seek for a Petition to be on the Discuss List then they’ll ask the Clerk to make a Call for a Response.

The Brunsons’ Petition has NOT had any Call for a Response made. So, it can’t have been on the Discuss List for very long and most likely it’s not and every day its odds of getting on the Discuss List goes down considerably.

What is your source, if any, that there has been a Call for a Response made? And what is your reasoning that their Petition is on the Discuss List if no Call for a Response has been made?

Are you actually intelligent and honest enough to understand this? If yes, then please demonstrate this. If not, it’s obviously a waste of time to discuss further.

[Dr. Franklin]

Every single Petition that has followed these 4 steps like the Brunsons’ petition has ended up being Denied.

Name each and every one of them. I am waiting.

And what is your reasoning that their Petition is on the Discuss List if no Call for a Response has been made?

You ass/u/me much:
The Screening Process
Once the opposition to a cert petition is either filed with the Court or waived, the screening process begins. Screening is performed by a law clerk assigned from the "cert pool" of clerks working for each of the Supreme Court justices... The cert pool clerk will read all the briefs and will draft a detailed memo summarizing the proceedings below, the arguments for and against granting cert, and a recommendation for what action the Court should take. The cert pool memo is then distributed to the justices, who each have their own procedures for review.
Once the justices and their clerks have reviewed the cert pool memo, a few cases will be scheduled for discussion at the justices' weekly conference. For cert to be granted, four justices must vote in favor.
Obtaining Certiorari In The United States Supreme Court

[Fury]

You can do all the wish-casting you want. There’s only one way to remove a President from office - conviction in an Impeachment trial.

Follow the U.S. Constitution, or work to change it. You stomping your feet wanting otherwise is not getting to resolve the issue.

[philman_36]

There’s only one way to remove a President from office - conviction in an Impeachment trial.

Thanks for sharing your opinion.

BTW, you forget the 25th Amendment. It's why I keep hitting your "only one way" claim.

[Degaston]

I’ll give you 4 for now and look up at least the next 4 when you provide me at least 1 that matches the Brunson’s petition’s status before its Conference date where the Petition was granted CERTIORARI.

I started with the methodology of using the latest 4 possibilities and only doing those by doing these steps below. The results were as expected to show what will happen with the Brunsons’ petition getting denied.

Step 1. Link to the Supreme Court 2022 records search web page
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/ordersofthecourt/22

Step 2. Look up the latest regular orders of the Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/121222zor_1qm1.pdf

Step 3. Start from the bottom and these are the last 4

22-6038
22-6039
22-6047
22-6051

Step 4. Go look at the Brunson docket
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html

These are the 2nd/3rd of 3 entries in Proceedings/Orders.
Nov 23 2022 Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Nov 30 2022 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-6038.html
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-6039.html
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-6047.html
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-6051.html

All 4 of them have the following info as their 2nd-4th of 4 entries in Proceedings/Orders.
Nov 18 2022 Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Nov 23 2022 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/9/2022.
Dec 12 2022 Petition DENIED.

In follow up I have 2 questions for you.

(1) How do you see it being fair in a dialogue that I’m supposed to prove for you that every single one of over 100,000 petitions denied when you were asked earlier to provide at least 1 example that sets a precedent but you haven’t provided any?

(2) Are you actually going to provide any examples of any actual Petitions that set a precedent like the Brunsons where they actually get granted CERTIORARI?

If you can’t see how you are being unfair on question #1 then you are hopeless.

If you don’t actually provide any actual petition on question #2 then you are basically suggesting that this particular Petition will be setting a completely brand new precedent.

Important Disclaimer: If the Proceedings/Orders entry for the Brunsons’ Petition has any additional entries before January 6th then I will re-analyze my opinion on its outcome at that conference. If nothing changes then yes its obvious that it’ll be Denied.

[Degaston]

Here are some examples of what a Docket looks like where its getting granted Certerori

1. Go to the main search page page for 2022.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/ordersofthecourt/22

2. Pull up the most recent miscellanious orders.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/121322zr_k536.pdf

There are 2 petitions that were granted certiorari.
21-1576
22-196

And here are their dockets
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-1576.html
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-196.html

[Mr. K]

You know people like you, who say that nothing will ever happen to them- so we shouldn’t bother trying, are responsible for more harm than good throughout history

[philman_36]

BTTT